• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## A long-term study of some 1,000 physicians indicates that

This topic has 11 expert replies and 12 member replies
Goto page
• 1,
• 2
RBBmba@2014 Legendary Member
Joined
30 May 2012
Posted:
888 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Thanked:
8 times

#### A long-term study of some 1,000 physicians indicates that

Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:16 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
• Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
A long-term study of some 1,000 physicians indicates that the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they had a likelihood of coronary disease.

(A) more they had a likelihood of coronary disease
(B) more was their likelihood of having coronary disease
(C) more they would have a likelihood to have coronary disease
(D) greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease
(E) greater was coronary disease likely

OA: D

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
RBBmba@2014 Legendary Member
Joined
30 May 2012
Posted:
888 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Thanked:
8 times
Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:54 pm
Hi Verbal Experts (Dave/Mitch/Ceilidh/others) - Could you please share your detail ANALYSIS on this SC ?

Also, please let me know why OA is preferred to Option A ?

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13361 messages
Followed by:
1779 members
Thanked:
12885 times
GMAT Score:
790
Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:40 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
A long-term study of some 1,000 physicians indicates that the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they had a likelihood of coronary disease.

(A) more they had a likelihood of coronary disease
(B) more was their likelihood of having coronary disease
(C) more they would have a likelihood to have coronary disease
(D) greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease
(E) greater was coronary disease likely

OA: D
A: the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they had
C: the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they would have
Here, these doctors drank is an ADJECTIVE serving to describe coffee.
What KIND of coffee?
coffee THESE DOCTORS DRANK.
Thus, coffee these doctors drank = NOUN + MODIFIER.
But each of the portions in red consists of SUBJECT + VERB.
Result:
NOUN + MODIFIER (coffee these doctors drank) and SUBJECT + VERB (the two portions in red) are not parallel.
Eliminate A and C.

B: the more was their likelihood
Here, more seems to refer to likelihood.
likelihood = probability = a NUMBER.
A number cannot be MORE.
A number can only be GREATER.
Eliminate B.

E: the greater was coronary disease
Here, greater seems to refer to coronary disease, implying that CORONARY DISEASE was GREATER.
Not the intended meaning.
The intended meaning is that the LIKELIHOOD of coronary disease was greater.
Eliminate E.

In the OA, more coffee and greater likelihood constitute a parallel and logical comparison.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
RBBmba@2014 Legendary Member
Joined
30 May 2012
Posted:
888 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Thanked:
8 times
Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:07 am
Hi GMATGuruNY,
Couple of quick questions -

1. The reason you mentioned above to eliminate B, I think, should also hold good to eliminate A & C. Isn't it ?

2. Could you please help me understand that how the following NOUN + MODIFIER structure is maintained in the OA ?

GMATGuruNY wrote:
coffee THESE DOCTORS DRANK.
Thus, coffee these doctors drank = NOUN + MODIFIER.

In the OA, more coffee and greater likelihood constitute a parallel and logical comparison.

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13361 messages
Followed by:
1779 members
Thanked:
12885 times
GMAT Score:
790
Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:00 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
Hi GMATGuruNY,
Couple of quick questions -

1. The reason you mentioned above to eliminate B, I think, should also hold good to eliminate A & C. Isn't it ?
No.
In B, more is an adjective serving to modify likelihood.
In A and C, more is an ADVERB serving to modify the following verb.

Quote:
2. Could you please help me understand that how the following NOUN + MODIFIER structure is maintained in the OA ?
A: the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they had a likelihood
Here, the first more is an ADJECTIVE serving to modify coffee, while the second more is an ADVERB serving to modify had.
Since the two comparatives serve different functions, the result is a lack of parallelism.

The same reasoning can be applied to C.

OA: the more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was their likelihood
Here, greater is an ADJECTIVE serving to modify their likelihood, just as more is an adjective serving to modify coffee.
Since the two comparatives serve the same function, the result is parallelism.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:13 am; edited 1 time in total

Thanked by: RBBmba@2014
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
RBBmba@2014 Legendary Member
Joined
30 May 2012
Posted:
888 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Thanked:
8 times
Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
OA: the more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was the likelihood
Here, greater is an ADJECTIVE serving to modify the likelihood, just as more is an adjective serving to modify coffee.
Since the two comparatives serve the same function, the result is parallelism.
I understand your explanations on the other parts and NO ISSUE with the above part as well.

BUT, I'm just NOT able to understand clearly that how the NOUN + MODIFIER structure (=coffee these doctors drank) in the first clause is maintained in the OA ? How EXACTLY we're relating this structure with the second clause (=was their likelihood) in the OA ?

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13361 messages
Followed by:
1779 members
Thanked:
12885 times
GMAT Score:
790
Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:40 pm
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
I'm just NOT able to understand clearly that how the NOUN + MODIFIER structure (=coffee these doctors drank) in the first clause is maintained in the OA ? How EXACTLY we're relating this structure with the second clause (=was their likelihood) in the OA ?
The more coffee these doctors drink, the greater their likelihood of having coronary disease.
In each portion:
red = comparative.
blue = noun.
green = modifier.
Here, both portions refer to the PRESENT.

If both portions are converted to the PAST, we get the OA:
The more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease.
Here, the verb was is added to the second portion to make it clear that their likelihood WAS greater IN THE PAST.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:14 am; edited 1 time in total

Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
RBBmba@2014 Legendary Member
Joined
30 May 2012
Posted:
888 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Thanked:
8 times
Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:04 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
If both portions are converted to the PAST, we get the OA:
The more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was the likelihood of their having coronary disease.
Here, the verb was is added to the second portion to make it clear that the likelihood WAS greater IN THE PAST.
Got this now...however, I think the OA is actually : The more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease -- their likelihood is basically NOUN-phrase here. Right ?

A quick question - JUST to VERIFY the correctness of a comparison in a Sentence involving TWO COMPARATIVES (such as MORE/GREATER), won't it be SUFFICIENT to check ONLY whether the TWO COMPARATIVES serve the same function ? Because TWO COMPARATIVES serving the same function means the result is parallelism.

I guess, after doing the above check, if we find that parallelism is attained then we can proceed to find whether there is any other ERROR or not! Thoughts ?

(For example, in this SC, for each of the two options B and D, we can see that the two comparatives serve the same function in BOTH underlined and non-underlined portions. So, COMPARISON is grammatically CORRECT till this point, but as there is OTHER ERROR in B we ultimately choose the OA and eliminate B.)

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13361 messages
Followed by:
1779 members
Thanked:
12885 times
GMAT Score:
790
Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:33 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
If both portions are converted to the PAST, we get the OA:
The more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was the likelihood of their having coronary disease.
Here, the verb was is added to the second portion to make it clear that the likelihood WAS greater IN THE PAST.
Got this now...however, I think the OA is actually : The more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease -- their likelihood is basically NOUN-phrase here. Right ?
Good catch.
I've amended my response above to reflect the actual wording in the OA.

Quote:
A quick question - JUST to VERIFY the correctness of a comparison in a Sentence involving TWO COMPARATIVES (such as MORE/GREATER), won't it be SUFFICIENT to check ONLY whether the TWO COMPARATIVES serve the same function ? Because TWO COMPARATIVES serving the same function means the result is parallelism.

I guess, after doing the above check, if we find that parallelism is attained then we can proceed to find whether there is any other ERROR or not! Thoughts ?
Sounds reasonable.
But please note the constraint below.

Quote:
(For example, in this SC, for each of the two options B and D, we can see that the two comparatives serve the same function in BOTH underlined and non-underlined portions. So, COMPARISON is grammatically CORRECT till this point, but as there is OTHER ERROR in B we ultimately choose the OA and eliminate B.)
The comparison in B is not grammatically viable.
The idiom in B is as follows:
The more X, the more Y.
In this idiom, the more cannot be followed by a verb.
Consider this an idiomatic constraint.

B: The more coffee these doctors drank, the more was their likelihood.
Here, the more in red is incorrectly followed by a verb (was).
Eliminate B.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Thanked by: RBBmba@2014
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
Crystal W Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
02 Mar 2016
Posted:
154 messages
Thanked:
2 times
Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:19 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
I'm just NOT able to understand clearly that how the NOUN + MODIFIER structure (=coffee these doctors drank) in the first clause is maintained in the OA ? How EXACTLY we're relating this structure with the second clause (=was their likelihood) in the OA ?
The more coffee these doctors drink, the greater their likelihood of having coronary disease.
In each portion:
red = comparative.
blue = noun.
green = modifier.
Here, both portions refer to the PRESENT.

If both portions are converted to the PAST, we get the OA:
The more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease.
Here, the verb was is added to the second portion to make it clear that their likelihood WAS greater IN THE PAST.
Thank you for your explanation. This question makes me so confused. Only thing is do you miss "is" at the end of your present sentence? Or we do not need the verb "is" in the present tense?

thang Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
31 Oct 2007
Posted:
111 messages
Thanked:
11 times
Test Date:
May 2015
Target GMAT Score:
650
Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:59 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
A long-term study of some 1,000 physicians indicates that the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they had a likelihood of coronary disease.

(A) more they had a likelihood of coronary disease
(B) more was their likelihood of having coronary disease
(C) more they would have a likelihood to have coronary disease
(D) greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease
(E) greater was coronary disease likely

OA: D
A: the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they had
C: the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they would have
Here, these doctors drank is an ADJECTIVE serving to describe coffee.
What KIND of coffee?
coffee THESE DOCTORS DRANK.
Thus, coffee these doctors drank = NOUN + MODIFIER.
But each of the portions in red consists of SUBJECT + VERB.
Result:
NOUN + MODIFIER (coffee these doctors drank) and SUBJECT + VERB (the two portions in red) are not parallel.
Eliminate A and C.

B: the more was their likelihood
Here, more seems to refer to likelihood.
likelihood = probability = a NUMBER.
A number cannot be MORE.
A number can only be GREATER.
Eliminate B.

E: the greater was coronary disease
Here, greater seems to refer to coronary disease, implying that CORONARY DISEASE was GREATER.
Not the intended meaning.
The intended meaning is that the LIKELIHOOD of coronary disease was greater.
Eliminate E.

In the OA, more coffee and greater likelihood constitute a parallel and logical comparison.
i do not understand why a and c are wrong.
i can say: the more this kind of coffee i drink, the more i hate it. is this sentence correct?

thang Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
31 Oct 2007
Posted:
111 messages
Thanked:
11 times
Test Date:
May 2015
Target GMAT Score:
650
Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:18 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
A long-term study of some 1,000 physicians indicates that the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they had a likelihood of coronary disease.

(A) more they had a likelihood of coronary disease
(B) more was their likelihood of having coronary disease
(C) more they would have a likelihood to have coronary disease
(D) greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease
(E) greater was coronary disease likely

OA: D
hard one:
likelihood of doing something is logic and idiomatic
likelihood of something can be used with some nouns, not all. likelihood of existence of agent is correct.
likelihood of desease is not logic , using our common sense of this world.

this is the reason why a and c are wrong

_________________
looking for the girl living in Bradford UK, visiting Halong bay, Vietnam on 26- 27 Jan 2014. all persons, pls, forward this message to all persons you know to help me find her: my email: usavictory47@gmail.com, call: 84904812758

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13361 messages
Followed by:
1779 members
Thanked:
12885 times
GMAT Score:
790
Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:22 am
Crystal W wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
I'm just NOT able to understand clearly that how the NOUN + MODIFIER structure (=coffee these doctors drank) in the first clause is maintained in the OA ? How EXACTLY we're relating this structure with the second clause (=was their likelihood) in the OA ?
The more coffee these doctors drink, the greater their likelihood of having coronary disease.
In each portion:
red = comparative.
blue = noun.
green = modifier.
Here, both portions refer to the PRESENT.

If both portions are converted to the PAST, we get the OA:
The more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease.
Here, the verb was is added to the second portion to make it clear that their likelihood WAS greater IN THE PAST.
Thank you for your explanation. This question makes me so confused. Only thing is do you miss "is" at the end of your present sentence? Or we do not need the verb "is" in the present tense?
The construction here is as follows:
THE + COMPARATIVE , THE + COMPARATIVE.

Other examples:
The more John talked, the less Mary understood.
The longer the team practices, the greater its chances of winning.
The bigger the risk, the bigger the payout.

As illustrated by the portions in red, is and are may be omitted in this construction.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Thanked by: Crystal W
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13361 messages
Followed by:
1779 members
Thanked:
12885 times
GMAT Score:
790
Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:39 am
thang wrote:
i do not understand why a and c are wrong.
Generally, to compare statistical data, we use greater rather than more:
a GREATER number of people
a GREATER percentage of citizens
a GREATER probability of success

The same holds true for likelihood:
a GREATER likelihood of victory

A: the more they had a likelihood
B: the more was their likelihood
C: the more they would have a likelihood
In these options, more is incorrectly ascribed to a likelihood.
The correct comparative for a likelihood is GREATER.
Eliminate A, B and C.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Thanked by: Mo2men, dustystormy
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
thuyduong91vnu Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
11 Apr 2016
Posted:
27 messages
Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:16 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
A: the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they had
C: the more coffee these doctors drank, the more they would have
Here, these doctors drank is an ADJECTIVE serving to describe coffee.
What KIND of coffee?
coffee THESE DOCTORS DRANK.
Thus, coffee these doctors drank = NOUN + MODIFIER.
But each of the portions in red consists of SUBJECT + VERB.
Result:
NOUN + MODIFIER (coffee these doctors drank) and SUBJECT + VERB (the two portions in red) are not parallel.
Eliminate A and C.

In the OA, more coffee and greater likelihood constitute a parallel and logical comparison.
Hi GMATGuruNY,

I have 2 questions for this one:

1, In case we have the first part in the same structure (Adverb + Subject + Verb instead of Adjective + Noun + Modifier), does it reasonable to say "the more they had a likelihood of..." ? I just find this bold expression somewhat strange, is it a right one?

2, OG gave the comment that "would have a likelihood" (C choice) is a redundant expression without any explanation, is it because the meanings of "would" and "likelihood" somewhat overlap?

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 65 topics
3 Roland2rule 49 topics
4 ardz24 40 topics
5 LUANDATO 16 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

146 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

103 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

100 posts
4 EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

92 posts
5 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

79 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts