Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register

11. If W +x <0, is w-y>0?

This topic has 14 member replies
mmgmat2008 Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
Joined
11 Nov 2008
Posted:
23 messages
11. If W +x <0, is w-y>0? Post Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:00 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    (1) x+y <0
    (2) y<x<w
    Answer b

    I got this wrong. why not D for this question?

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    niraj_a GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    01 Jun 2008
    Posted:
    708 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    13 times
    Post Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 am
    from the stem, they are asking if w > y

    statement II gives you that info directly while statement I does not.

    what's the source?

    hwiya320 Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    02 Sep 2008
    Posted:
    93 messages
    Thanked:
    7 times
    Post Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:19 am
    mmgmat2008 wrote:
    (1) x+y <0
    (2) y<x<w
    Answer b

    I got this wrong. why not D for this question?
    Stem is stating,
    W + X < 0
    W < -X or W > X,
    asking, is W>Y?

    1) x +y < 0
    which means x < -Y or -X > Y
    so we knew that -X is greater than W, and now we know that -X is greater than Y. That doesn't prove that W is greater than Y.

    I think what you did was X > -Y then flip the sign and got rid of negative for ALL numbers, X < Y... I assume that's how you determined that W>Y>X?

    This Q is from GMATPrep.

    mmgmat2008 Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    11 Nov 2008
    Posted:
    23 messages
    Post Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:19 am
    This type of questions is my weakness.
    Thanks for the answers. I will try to not make the same mistake tomorrow at my G day!Smile

    cramya GMAT Titan Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Aug 2008
    Posted:
    2469 messages
    Followed by:
    9 members
    Thanked:
    325 times
    Post Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:34 pm
    Think of it this way.

    No info about x,y,w are given (may or may not be integers)

    Since w+x<0 is given all we know is either both are negative or one of them is negative and other positive with the abolsute value of the negative number greater than the absolute value of the positive number.

    Given w+x<0

    w+x<0 i.e w< - x Is w-y>0 or w > y

    Stmt II(always try to pick the easier of the 2 statements - just my opinion)

    y<x<w

    Exactly what we need w>y

    SUFF

    Now its down to B) or D) .

    This way u have increased the probability of answering the question right (50% prob)


    Given w+x<0 i.e w < -x (1)

    Stmt I

    x+y <0 I.E X< - Y (2)

    U can pick numbers here where w > y and where w < y satisfying (1) and (2)


    INSUFF


    Choose B)

    chipbmk Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    05 Oct 2009
    Posted:
    70 messages
    Post Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:02 pm
    Why can we not do this for statement 1:

    Given: W+X<0

    Statement 1: X+Y<0

    Given --> X+W<0
    Statement 1--> X+Y<0
    ______ (subtract the statements)
    = W-Y<0 or W<Y

    Doesnt that give you a definitive "no" to the question is w-y>0? or is w>y? appears like it does to me ... let me know

    mehravikas GMAT Titan Default Avatar
    Joined
    12 May 2008
    Posted:
    1161 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    23 times
    Test Date:
    ********
    Target GMAT Score:
    740
    Post Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:36 pm
    you can never subtract inequalities. you can only add them.

    - 1 < 0
    -2 < 0
    If you add both inequalities you get -3 < 0, which is correct.

    If you subtract 2nd statement from 1 i.e.

    -1 < 0
    -2 < 0
    - -
    -------

    1 < 0 - incorrect

    chipbmk wrote:
    Why can we not do this for statement 1:

    Given: W+X<0

    Statement 1: X+Y<0

    Given --> X+W<0
    Statement 1--> X+Y<0
    ______ (subtract the statements)
    = W-Y<0 or W<Y

    Doesnt that give you a definitive "no" to the question is w-y>0? or is w>y? appears like it does to me ... let me know

    missrochelle Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
    Joined
    09 Jun 2010
    Posted:
    117 messages
    Post Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:22 pm
    mehravikas wrote:
    you can never subtract inequalities. you can only add them.

    - 1 < 0
    -2 < 0
    If you add both inequalities you get -3 < 0, which is correct.

    If you subtract 2nd statement from 1 i.e.

    -1 < 0
    -2 < 0
    - -
    -------

    1 < 0 - incorrect
    [/quote]IF YOU ADD THE INEQUALITY IN STATEMENT 1, TO THE STEM THEN HOW DO YOU GET -3 <1?

    W + X < 0
    X+ Y < 0
    W+2X+Y < 0
    WHICH DOESN'T ALLOW YOU TO ISOLATE W-Y..... IS THIS INCORRECT?

    andy123 Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    20 Sep 2009
    Posted:
    55 messages
    Post Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:32 am
    W + X < 0
    W < -X or W > X,
    asking, is W>Y?


    Stupid Question but please help :

    Is it OK to convert:

    W < -X --- >> to ---- >> W > X,

    I thought if we multiply by -1 , then we have to multiply both the sides of the equations and reverse the inequality ??

    so in thi case: W < -X should not it be converted to -W > X ???

    Smile

    Night reader GMAT Titan Default Avatar
    Joined
    27 Dec 2008
    Posted:
    1337 messages
    Followed by:
    9 members
    Thanked:
    121 times
    Test Date:
    03/28/11
    Post Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:33 am
    an interesting problem popped up today. I found answer which is not OA cited in the post, please contribute

    ... this question's title contains part of this DS, so I am copying/pasting the title of the post back into the post Smile
    w<-x OR x<-w. Is w>y?
    st(1) x<-y --> as x<-w both -w and -y can be greater than y, BUT we don't know if if w>y Not Sufficient;
    st(2) y<x<w --> as x<-w and x<w, then we can deduce x<0 and |w|<x . If x<0 then y<0 too. And if y<x then |y|>|x|. If w<0 then w lies to the right from y, i.e. -y<-w. If w>0 then w lies to the left of y again, i.e. y<w. Since we don't know the sign of w, and w can be both +ve and -ve statement(2) is Not Sufficient;
    Combined st(1&2): x<-y and y<x<w --> -x>y U x>y suggest y<0 and |x|<y. This is too not sufficient, as both w>y and -w>y present (the same condition was met in statement 2 Alone) BUT we need to meet both conditions w>y AND -w<-y

    IOM E

    Quote:
    If W +x <0, is w-y>0?
    (1) x+y <0
    (2) y<x<w
    mmgmat2008 wrote:
    (1) x+y <0
    (2) y<x<w
    Answer b

    I got this wrong. why not D for this question?

    _________________
    My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at http://www.gmatpill.com

    andy123 Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    20 Sep 2009
    Posted:
    55 messages
    Post Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:58 am
    2nd equation is easy:

    Question prompt requires us to prooove: w-y > 0

    which means: W > y ??

    Option B: already gives the olution y<x<W - thus B.

    HSPA GMAT Titan
    Joined
    28 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    1101 messages
    Followed by:
    12 members
    Thanked:
    47 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    720
    GMAT Score:
    640
    Post Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:57 am
    w-y = w+x-x-y = (w+x)-(x+y)


    Now let us use A (x+y <0) : (w+x)-(x+y) = -ve - ( -ve) [INSUFFICIENT]... we dont know how much negitive each fellow is
    Now let us use B :
    Consider w = 1, x = -2, y = -3
    then (W+X)-(X+Y) = -1+5
    w= 100, x = -101 then y is more negitive

    But now
    w= -1, x=0 so w+x <0 then x>y so y = -1... no w>y so y = -2...

    Hello All ..... B seems fine for me

    Night reader GMAT Titan Default Avatar
    Joined
    27 Dec 2008
    Posted:
    1337 messages
    Followed by:
    9 members
    Thanked:
    121 times
    Test Date:
    03/28/11
    Post Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:35 am
    Perhaps I got lost in inequality translations, after plug in and with condition given (w+x<0) I figured |x| could not be more than |w| - so B is Sufficient.
    thanks

    _________________
    My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at http://www.gmatpill.com

    ankur.agrawal Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
    Joined
    31 Mar 2010
    Posted:
    261 messages
    Followed by:
    3 members
    Thanked:
    11 times
    Test Date:
    23rd April, 2011
    Target GMAT Score:
    700
    GMAT Score:
    NA
    Post Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:13 am
    [quote="mmgmat2008"](1) x+y <0
    (2) y<x<w
    Answer b

    W+x<0 ; W-y>0 or is W>y ?

    1) Take w =-2 & x=-3 y=-4 ; These value satisfies W+x<0 & x+y <0

    Is W>y. From Values taken it seems Yes it is.

    Lets test another set of values : x=1 ; y=-2 ; w=-3

    Is W>y . No . A yes & a No . This Statement is not sufficient.

    2) Taking the same value for the first case as above:

    Take w =-2 & x=-3 y=-4. These values satisfies y<x<w & W+x<0 .

    Is w> y . Yes . Lets check another set of values.

    w=2 ; x=-3 ; y=-4. again a yes.

    If we use this method i think the answer should be D. lets check algebraically for the 2nd Statement.

    W+x <0 ; y<x<w

    Ist Case : Both Negative : Yes W>y
    2nd Case: W + & x - (x has to be more negative than w is positive) = Yes W>y
    3rd Case : W- & x+ ( W has to be more negative than x is +)= Yes W>y.

    Am i missing sumthing.

    I Think B

    ankur.agrawal Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
    Joined
    31 Mar 2010
    Posted:
    261 messages
    Followed by:
    3 members
    Thanked:
    11 times
    Test Date:
    23rd April, 2011
    Target GMAT Score:
    700
    GMAT Score:
    NA
    Post Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:15 am
    [quote="mmgmat2008"](1) x+y <0
    (2) y<x<w
    Answer b

    W+x<0 ; W-y>0 or is W>y ?

    1) Take w =-2 & x=-3 y=-4 ; These value satisfies W+x<0 & x+y <0

    Is W>y. From Values taken it seems Yes it is.

    Lets test another set of values : x=1 ; y=-2 ; w=-3

    Is W>y . No . A yes & a No . This Statement is not sufficient.

    2) Taking the same value for the first case as above:

    Take w =-2 & x=-3 y=-4. These values satisfies y<x<w & W+x<0 .

    Is w> y . Yes . Lets check another set of values.

    w=2 ; x=-3 ; y=-4. again a yes.

    If we use this method i think the answer should be D. lets check algebraically for the 2nd Statement.

    W+x <0 ; y<x<w

    Ist Case : Both Negative : Yes W>y
    2nd Case: W + & x - (x has to be more negative than w is positive) = Yes W>y
    3rd Case : W- & x+ ( W has to be more negative than x is +)= Yes W>y.

    Am i missing sumthing.

    I Think B

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 j_shreyans 73 topics
    2 abhasjha 28 topics
    3 aditya8062 25 topics
    4 RiyaR 18 topics
    5 tanvis1120 16 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    161 posts
    2 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    141 posts
    3 image description David@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    67 posts
    4 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    60 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    41 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts