1000 CR - Test 6 - Q 19

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:57 pm
Thanked: 1 times

1000 CR - Test 6 - Q 19

by nikhilagrawal » Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:36 am
19. In January there was a large drop in the number of new houses sold, because interest rates for mortgages were falling and many consumers were waiting to see how low the rates would go. This large sales drop was accompanied by a sharp rise in the average price of new houses sold.
Which of the following, if true, best explains the sharp rise in the average price of new houses?
(A) Sales of higher-priced houses were unaffected by the sales drop because their purchasers have fewer constraints limiting the total amount they pay.
(B) Labor agreements of builders with construction unions are not due to expire until the next January.
(C) The prices of new houses have been rising slowly over the past three years because there is an increasing shortage of housing.
(D) There was a greater amount of moderate-priced housing available for resale by owners during January than in the preceding three months.
(E) Interest rates for home mortgages are expected to rise sharply later in the year if predictions of increased business activity in general prove to be accurate.

Will post IMO by EOD

Legendary Member
Posts: 572
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:25 am
Thanked: 21 times

by reachac » Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:20 am
IMO A

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:08 am
IMO:A


IF the purchasers dont have any problem or constraints paying the total cost of the houses then why would they care about mortgages interest rates..

And if high-priced houses costs are not affected and if they are more number of houses that are sold then of course average price of houses will increase.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by NSNguyen » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:01 am
I will go with A
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:16 pm

1000 cr

by focusspeed » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:40 pm
Could you please email me the copy of 1000 sc? I really need it. Thank you in advance. My id is: [email protected]

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:16 pm

1000 cr

by focusspeed » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:40 pm
Could you please email me the copy of 1000 sc? I really need it. Thank you in advance. My id is: [email protected]

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:16 pm

1000 cr

by focusspeed » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:41 pm
Could you please email me the copy of 1000 sc? I really need it. Thank you in advance. My id is: [email protected]

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:16 pm

1000 cr

by focusspeed » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:41 pm
Could you please email me the copy of 1000 sc? I really need it. Thank you in advance. My id is: [email protected]

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:48 am
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:690

by Jason11 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:58 am
raunekk wrote:IMO:A


IF the purchasers dont have any problem or constraints paying the total cost of the houses then why would they care about mortgages interest rates..

And if high-priced houses costs are not affected and if they are more number of houses that are sold then of course average price of houses will increase.
The A doesn't explain the reason of the "sharp rise" of high-priced houses costs. There is no sign of the more number of houses sold.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:45 pm
Jason11 wrote:
raunekk wrote:IMO:A


IF the purchasers dont have any problem or constraints paying the total cost of the houses then why would they care about mortgages interest rates..

And if high-priced houses costs are not affected and if they are more number of houses that are sold then of course average price of houses will increase.
The A doesn't explain the reason of the "sharp rise" of high-priced houses costs. There is no sign of the more number of houses sold.
Firstly, this question type is known as "Resolve the Paradox".
It has two features:
1) No conclusion
2) The facts or premises stated usually contradict each other.

Secondly,
For this kind of question type you should always consider answer choices as true which means the stimuli is under investigation. Also we dont have to disapprove any of the facts stated in the Stimuli, we just have to resolve, rather find an answer choice which can explain both the situations in a perfect manner.

With the above steps you can easily eliminate all the answer choices except A

If you look answer choice A, it resolves the paradox perfectly keeping all the ends attached.

"Sales of higher-priced houses were unaffected by the sales drop because their purchasers have fewer constraints limiting the total amount they pay."

This means the sales drop in the housing market holds no relevance to sale of higher priced house. And that is exactly whats been asked in the question.

Let me know if you still have any doubts.

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Sat Dec 20, 2008 11:09 am
I have a query regarding this question so I thought that perhaps it'll be helpful to reactivate this old thread...

How are new houses related to "higher" priced houses?

The stimulus is talking about new houses and NOT higher priced houses, unless I missed a point.

The question is also asking to resolve the paradox for "new houses" and not higher priced houses.

Can someone shed more light on this ?

Thanks !

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:12 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by gmataug08 » Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:45 pm
IMO A.

my reasoning:

from question stem,
1. total number of new houses sold has dropped
2. average price of new houses sold has sharp rise

from choice A,
high end buyers not affected by intrest change ==> means they went on with their usual rate of purchase. that would explain the sharp increase in the average.


for example , till the market slide , if 6 moderate /low-end houses (100K each ) and 2 high end houses( 500K each) were sold . it would make the average price per house sold to be 1600K / 8 ==> 200K

considerign the same market after the intrest rate change.... as by choice A , high-end buyers were not affected, so presumably the sale would be --> 0 low-end houses and 2 high end houses , that would make the average per house sold to be 1000K/2 --> 500K.

that would explain the sharp increase in average price of new houses sold.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:00 am

by samanthaJ79 » Fri May 13, 2016 3:19 am
I also go with answer A

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:00 am

by samanthaJ79 » Fri May 13, 2016 3:19 am
I also go with answer A