BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The health benefits of tea

Expert replies
by sparsh.21 » Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:39 am
The health benefits of tea have been the subject of much research; in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibiting some forms of cancer, the brewed leaves of Camellia sinensis may also play a role in reducing the risk of heart disease and stroke.

A. in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibiting
B. in addition to its possibilities to prevent or inhibit
C. besides the possibility that it prevents and inhibits
D. besides the possible preventing and inhibiting of
E. besides possibly preventing or inhibiting


OA is E

Please explain the answer...
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: The health benefits of tea

by iamcste » Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:39 am
sparsh.21 wrote:The health benefits of tea have been the subject of much research; in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibiting some forms of cancer, the brewed leaves of Camellia sinensis may also play a role in reducing the risk of heart disease and stroke.

A. in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibiting
B. in addition to its possibilities to prevent or inhibit
C. besides the possibility that it prevents and inhibits
D. besides the possible preventing and inhibiting of
E. besides possibly preventing or inhibiting


OA is E



Please explain the answer...

PLural subject wont take singular pronoun "it" or "its"

Left with D and E

Preventing or inhibit parallels reducing

Also, Prevent or Inhibit seems logical IMO

Choose E
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:04 pm
But,

Orginal meaning gives equal status to both INHIBITING and PREVENTION by using AND
In E we use "OR"

is it valid ???
Join the discussion

by papgust » Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:51 pm
IMO, preventing and inhibiting is illogical.

Prevent means to avoid. Inhibit means to reduce.

You cannot avoid and at the same time reduce cancer. Either you can avoid OR reduce. So, preventing or inhibiting is a proper construction.
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:22 pm
papgust wrote:IMO, preventing and inhibiting is illogical.

Prevent means to avoid. Inhibit means to reduce.

You cannot avoid and at the same time reduce cancer. Either you can avoid OR reduce. So, preventing or inhibiting is a proper construction.
thanks man !!

so we must stick to original meaning, if all fails ;-)
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:55 am
papgust wrote:IMO, preventing and inhibiting is illogical.

Prevent means to avoid. Inhibit means to reduce.

You cannot avoid and at the same time reduce cancer. Either you can avoid OR reduce. So, preventing or inhibiting is a proper construction.
this is correct.

what's the source of this question? it was probably inspired by #37 in the OG verbal supplement, in which we must change "damaged and destroyed" (from the original) into "damaged or destroyed", for exactly the same reason.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:26 am
I agree that E is best.

But I do not understand the grammatical role of "besides" in E. Pls, explain. Thank you.

the second point, pls, help

in D, "preventing" and "inhibiting" work as a noun and so it is not clear that they refer to "leaves" This point makes D become unclear and wrong.

is my thingking correct?
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:01 am
duongthang wrote:I agree that E is best.

But I do not understand the grammatical role of "besides" in E. Pls, explain. Thank you.
"besides" is a preposition. its objects are "preventing" and "inhibiting", which are gerunds (-ING nouns).
in D, "preventing" and "inhibiting" work as a noun and so it is not clear that they refer to "leaves" This point makes D become unclear and wrong.

is my thingking correct?
yes. if you say "the VERBing of...", that's usually a reference to the general idea of the action, dissociated from any particular actor/subject.

it's probably easier to eliminate that choice because the "and" doesn't make sense (as explained above -- should definitely be "or"), but this consideration is worth thinking about, too. nicely done.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1