BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! We’ve been nominated, and we’d love your vote!

We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Subjunctive confusion

Expert replies
by gmat740 » Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:53 pm
16) Until quite recently, American economists have assumed that the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers.
(A) the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs
and job seekers
(B) should the unemployment rate be four per cent, there is a rough balance among
jobs and job seekers
(C) were the unemployment rate four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs
and job seekers
(D) if the unemployment rate is four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs
and job seekers
(E) there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers when there is an
unemployment rate that is four per cent

OA-D

I am convinced by OA. But not convinced by the explanation.

The reason to kick out C is " S-V Agreement problem(highlighted with bold)"

My Question is:

Isn't this subjunctive Mood, so in that case we must use were

Also, if you remember the famous phrase :

If I were a rich man

Here we are talking about a desire : something which has not happened in past, so technically aren't we creating a tense problem here(WERE=>Past Tense)

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

If ..then

by Gmat09_5ALL » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:32 am
It is clearly causal situation. so, if..... then situation
please correct if I am incorrect
Join the discussion

Re: If ..then

by gmat740 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:05 am
Gmat09_5ALL wrote:It is clearly causal situation. so, if..... then situation
please correct if I am incorrect
If is a condition statement. Please look at the bold part of the sentence you have written. I found no better example to demonstrate my point.

You said correct me if I am incorrect

The bold part is the condition. :D
when the condition is satisfied, only then I can correct you.

Are you getting me?? :shock:
Join the discussion

Re: If ..then

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:47 am
gmat740 wrote:
Gmat09_5ALL wrote:It is clearly causal situation. so, if..... then situation
please correct if I am incorrect
If is a condition statement. Please look at the bold part of the sentence you have written. I found no better example to demonstrate my point.

You said correct me if I am incorrect

The bold part is the condition. :D
when the condition is satisfied, only then I can correct you.

Are you getting me?? :shock:
I fail to see the point you are making.

Are you saying that, since it is conditional, we should use subjunctive ?

If yes, this is not the case. Subjunctive is use for unreal and hypothetical conditions only.
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:41 am
I am sorry if my previous post deviated from the main topic.

Just to be straight forward, I want to ask:
If I were a rich man

Here we are talking about a desire : something which has not happened in past, so technically aren't we creating a tense problem here(WERE=>Past Tense)
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:52 am
gmat740 wrote:I am sorry if my previous post deviated from the main topic.

Just to be straight forward, I want to ask:
If I were a rich man

Here we are talking about a desire : something which has not happened in past, so technically aren't we creating a tense problem here(WERE=>Past Tense)
Yes, but that's how the subjunctive work :)
Join the discussion

by Gmat09_5ALL » Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:18 am
Karan,

Can you please show the error at a, b, c and e and How option D is correct ?
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:10 am
madhur_ahuja wrote:
gmat740 wrote:I am sorry if my previous post deviated from the main topic.

Just to be straight forward, I want to ask:
If I were a rich man

Here we are talking about a desire : something which has not happened in past, so technically aren't we creating a tense problem here(WERE=>Past Tense)
Yes, but that's how the subjunctive work :)
No, I mean the rule works, but it definitely creates a tense issue, specially when there are more than one verb as in this question. For Example: please take a look at option C in my next post below.
Last edited by gmat740 on Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:17 am
Gmat09_5ALL wrote:Karan,

Can you please show the error at a, b, c and e and How option D is correct ?
(A) the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers
being is usuallly wrong in GMAT because it makes the sentence passive

(B) should the unemployment rate be four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers
among is used for more than 2 people. A also has this error

(C) were the unemployment rate four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs and job seekers Tense error

(D) if the unemployment rate is four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs and job seekers

(E) there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers when there is an
unemployment rate that is four per cent
Passive & awkward
Hope this Helps
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:24 am
gmat740 wrote:
madhur_ahuja wrote:
gmat740 wrote:I am sorry if my previous post deviated from the main topic.

Just to be straight forward, I want to ask:
If I were a rich man

Here we are talking about a desire : something which has not happened in past, so technically aren't we creating a tense problem here(WERE=>Past Tense)
Yes, but that's how the subjunctive work :)
No, I mean the rule works, but it definitely creates a tense issue, specially when there are more than one verb as in this question. For Example: please take a look at option C in my next post below.
Hi Karan,

IMO we can solve this much more mechanically....

if were...."would".....

since would is not there so C is out .....

Please correct me if there are gaps in my reasoning.....

Thanks
Mohit
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1