If 20 Swiss Francs is enough to buy 9 notebooks and 3 pencils, is 40 Swiss Francs enough to buy 12 notebooks and 12 pencils?
(1) 20 Swiss Francs is enough to buy 7 notebooks and 5 pencils.
(2) 20 Swiss Francs is enough to buy 4 notebooks and 8 pencils.
OA : B
Please explain, thank
source: Gmatmaths.blogspot.com
notebook and pencil inequality

 Senior  Next Rank: 100 Posts
 Posts: 48
 Joined: 27 Aug 2008

 Master  Next Rank: 500 Posts
 Posts: 106
 Joined: 04 Feb 2009
 Location: Louisville, KY
 Thanked: 8 times
Just thinking out loud here. My initial guess would be E.nh8404052006 wrote:If 20 Swiss Francs is enough to buy 9 notebooks and 3 pencils, is 40 Swiss Francs enough to buy 12 notebooks and 12 pencils?
(1) 20 Swiss Francs is enough to buy 7 notebooks and 5 pencils.
(2) 20 Swiss Francs is enough to buy 4 notebooks and 8 pencils.
OA : B
Please explain, thank
source: Gmatmaths.blogspot.com
From the stem
20 >= 9n + 3p
Asking
40 >= 12n + 3p
i.) 20 >= 7n + 5p
We can't determine anything from this. It says that $20 is enough to buy but it doesn't say that the cost is $20. If a notebook cost $0.01 and a pencil cost $0.02 then all equations would be true. However a notebook might cost $0.10 and a pencil cost $0.30 and it would still be true for all equations. It is way to ambiguous.
ii) 20 >= 4n + 8p
again I don't see anything unique about this equation, or anything concrete we can derive from it.
The only answer I can think of is E.
IF it says that these items COST $20 then maybe we can do something but right now it might as well say $1,000,000 is enough to buy 9 notebooks and 3 pencils.
 DanaJ
 Site Admin
 Posts: 2567
 Joined: 01 Jan 2009
 Thanked: 712 times
 Followed by:550 members
 GMAT Score:770
I'll use "N" for notebooks and "P" for pencils, so it's easier for me to write the explanation.
You get that 9N + 3P <= 20 francs. You are interested to know if 12N + 12P < = 40 francs, i.e. 40 francs is enough to buy 12N and 12P or 12(N + P). In other words, the statements must yield info about N + P.
1. tells you that 7N + 5P <= 20. Couple that with 9N + 3P <= 20 to get that:
7N + 5P <= 20
9N + 3P <=20

16N + 8P <=40  as you can see, you can safely divide each side by 8 to get:
2N + P <= 5  this is not what we're looking for (we are looking for N + P).
So 1 is insufficient.
2. tells you that 4N + 8P <=20. Use the same reasoning as above:
4N + 8P <= 20
9N + 3P <= 20

13N + 12P <= 40
As you can see, 40 francs is enough to buy 13N and 12P, so it will surely be enough to buy 12N and 12P. This is why the answer is indeed the one provided.
You get that 9N + 3P <= 20 francs. You are interested to know if 12N + 12P < = 40 francs, i.e. 40 francs is enough to buy 12N and 12P or 12(N + P). In other words, the statements must yield info about N + P.
1. tells you that 7N + 5P <= 20. Couple that with 9N + 3P <= 20 to get that:
7N + 5P <= 20
9N + 3P <=20

16N + 8P <=40  as you can see, you can safely divide each side by 8 to get:
2N + P <= 5  this is not what we're looking for (we are looking for N + P).
So 1 is insufficient.
2. tells you that 4N + 8P <=20. Use the same reasoning as above:
4N + 8P <= 20
9N + 3P <= 20

13N + 12P <= 40
As you can see, 40 francs is enough to buy 13N and 12P, so it will surely be enough to buy 12N and 12P. This is why the answer is indeed the one provided.

 Senior  Next Rank: 100 Posts
 Posts: 48
 Joined: 27 Aug 2008
My attempt:
From question stem: 20 ≥ 9N + 3 P ….... (1)
From Statement (1) 20 ≥ 7N + 5 P ….... (2)
From Statement (2) 20 ≥ 4N + 8 P …… (3)
(1) + (2) + (3) ==> 60 ≥ 20N + 16 P … (4)
(4) / 2 ==> 30 ≥ 10N + 8 P ……. (5)
(5) – (2) ==> 10 ≥ 3N + 3 P ……..(6)
From question stem : 40 ≥ 12N + 12 P …. (7)
(7) /4 ==> 10 ≥ 3N + 3 P ……. (8)
Since equation (8) = equation (6) ==> Ans = C but OA = B
correct me if I make any mistake.
From question stem: 20 ≥ 9N + 3 P ….... (1)
From Statement (1) 20 ≥ 7N + 5 P ….... (2)
From Statement (2) 20 ≥ 4N + 8 P …… (3)
(1) + (2) + (3) ==> 60 ≥ 20N + 16 P … (4)
(4) / 2 ==> 30 ≥ 10N + 8 P ……. (5)
(5) – (2) ==> 10 ≥ 3N + 3 P ……..(6)
From question stem : 40 ≥ 12N + 12 P …. (7)
(7) /4 ==> 10 ≥ 3N + 3 P ……. (8)
Since equation (8) = equation (6) ==> Ans = C but OA = B
correct me if I make any mistake.
 DanaJ
 Site Admin
 Posts: 2567
 Joined: 01 Jan 2009
 Thanked: 712 times
 Followed by:550 members
 GMAT Score:770
Well, it's only natural that if stmt 2 is sufficient, then both stmts together are sufficient. It's the same as trying to solve this problem:
Is x greater than 4?
1. x is greater than 2
2. x is greater than 5
Of course, stmt 2 is sufficient, but it doesn't mean anything for the argument that you add the extra info that "x is greater than 2".
Plus, what you did here:
(5) – (2) ==> 10 ≥ 3N + 3 P ……..(6)
is something I like to avoid. Subtracting inequalities is not the best method of solving a question and can sometimes backfire.
Is x greater than 4?
1. x is greater than 2
2. x is greater than 5
Of course, stmt 2 is sufficient, but it doesn't mean anything for the argument that you add the extra info that "x is greater than 2".
Plus, what you did here:
(5) – (2) ==> 10 ≥ 3N + 3 P ……..(6)
is something I like to avoid. Subtracting inequalities is not the best method of solving a question and can sometimes backfire.

 Legendary Member
 Posts: 1035
 Joined: 27 Aug 2008
 Thanked: 104 times
 Followed by:1 members
hey DanaJ,DanaJ wrote: 2. tells you that 4N + 8P <=20. Use the same reasoning as above:
4N + 8P <= 20
9N + 3P <= 20

13N + 12P <= 40
As you can see, 40 francs is enough to buy 13N and 12P, so it will surely be enough to buy 12N and 12P. This is why the answer is indeed the one provided.
dont we get 13N+11P<40 ? (8+3=11)
from here how do we get to infer 12N+12P <40?
 DanaJ
 Site Admin
 Posts: 2567
 Joined: 01 Jan 2009
 Thanked: 712 times
 Followed by:550 members
 GMAT Score:770
OMG you are so right! Careless calculation mistake... No worries, it's easily fixed. Forget about that 13N + 11P <=40.
We can use the fact that 4N + 8P <=20  divide by 4 on each side to get:
N + 2P <= 5
Use the other inequality:
N + 2P <= 5
9N + 3P <=20

10N + 5P <= 25  divide by 5 on each side to get:
2N + P <=5 use this with N + 2P <= 5:
2N + P <=5
N + 2P <=5

3N + 3P <=10  multiply by 4 to get your final answer:
12N + 12P <=40
We can use the fact that 4N + 8P <=20  divide by 4 on each side to get:
N + 2P <= 5
Use the other inequality:
N + 2P <= 5
9N + 3P <=20

10N + 5P <= 25  divide by 5 on each side to get:
2N + P <=5 use this with N + 2P <= 5:
2N + P <=5
N + 2P <=5

3N + 3P <=10  multiply by 4 to get your final answer:
12N + 12P <=40

 Legendary Member
 Posts: 1035
 Joined: 27 Aug 2008
 Thanked: 104 times
 Followed by:1 members
wow, thats a smart solution, DanaJ. i could never have thought of such manipulations with the given equations.
 DanaJ
 Site Admin
 Posts: 2567
 Joined: 01 Jan 2009
 Thanked: 712 times
 Followed by:550 members
 GMAT Score:770
I don't really understand what you mean by "making sense" here. The inequalities are consistent with each other, if that's what you're talking about.
Take N = 1 and P = 2 to prove that.
1.5N + 1.5P = 1.5 + 3 = 4.5 <=5
P + 2N = 2 + 2 = 4 <=5
Take N = 1 and P = 2 to prove that.
1.5N + 1.5P = 1.5 + 3 = 4.5 <=5
P + 2N = 2 + 2 = 4 <=5
 pesfunk
 Master  Next Rank: 500 Posts
 Posts: 286
 Joined: 21 Sep 2010
 Location: Kolkata, India
 Thanked: 11 times
 Followed by:5 members
Hello Dana  Your explanation is quite clear to me except that I do not understand why did you use the symbol <=
When the question says "is enough", shouldn't it me equal or more ?
When the question says "is enough", shouldn't it me equal or more ?
DanaJ wrote:I'll use "N" for notebooks and "P" for pencils, so it's easier for me to write the explanation.
You get that 9N + 3P <= 20 francs. You are interested to know if 12N + 12P < = 40 francs, i.e. 40 francs is enough to buy 12N and 12P or 12(N + P). In other words, the statements must yield info about N + P.
1. tells you that 7N + 5P <= 20. Couple that with 9N + 3P <= 20 to get that:
7N + 5P <= 20
9N + 3P <=20

16N + 8P <=40  as you can see, you can safely divide each side by 8 to get:
2N + P <= 5  this is not what we're looking for (we are looking for N + P).
So 1 is insufficient.
2. tells you that 4N + 8P <=20. Use the same reasoning as above:
4N + 8P <= 20
9N + 3P <= 20

13N + 12P <= 40
As you can see, 40 francs is enough to buy 13N and 12P, so it will surely be enough to buy 12N and 12P. This is why the answer is indeed the one provided.

 Junior  Next Rank: 30 Posts
 Posts: 11
 Joined: 15 Jan 2011
 Followed by:1 members
Hi Danaj .. Correct if i am wrong
*********************************************************************************************************
Solution
A) Statement 1 is sufficient
7N + 5P <= 20  eqn 1
9N + 3P <=20  eqn 2
Eqn 1 can be re written as  > 2N + 5(N+P) <=20  eqn 3
Eqn 2 can be re written as  > 6N + 3(N+P) <=20  eqn 4
Mulitiplying eqn 3 by 3 > 6N + 15 (N+P) <=60  eqn 5
Subtracting eqn 5 and eqn 4 > 12(N+P)<=40
B) Statement 2 alone is sufficient
4N + 8P <= 20  eqn 1
9N + 3P <= 20  eqn 2
divinding eqn 1 by 4 we get > N + 2P <= 5  eqn 3  > N + (N+P)<=5  eqn 5
dividing eqn 2 by 3 we get > 3N + P <= 20/3  eqn 4 > 2N + (N+P) <=20/3  eqn 6
Multipltying eqn 5 by 2 and subtracting eqn 6 we get
(N+P)<= 10/3  eqn 7
Multiplying eqn 7 by 12 we get 12(N+P)<=40
*********************************************************************************************************
Solution
A) Statement 1 is sufficient
7N + 5P <= 20  eqn 1
9N + 3P <=20  eqn 2
Eqn 1 can be re written as  > 2N + 5(N+P) <=20  eqn 3
Eqn 2 can be re written as  > 6N + 3(N+P) <=20  eqn 4
Mulitiplying eqn 3 by 3 > 6N + 15 (N+P) <=60  eqn 5
Subtracting eqn 5 and eqn 4 > 12(N+P)<=40
B) Statement 2 alone is sufficient
4N + 8P <= 20  eqn 1
9N + 3P <= 20  eqn 2
divinding eqn 1 by 4 we get > N + 2P <= 5  eqn 3  > N + (N+P)<=5  eqn 5
dividing eqn 2 by 3 we get > 3N + P <= 20/3  eqn 4 > 2N + (N+P) <=20/3  eqn 6
Multipltying eqn 5 by 2 and subtracting eqn 6 we get
(N+P)<= 10/3  eqn 7
Multiplying eqn 7 by 12 we get 12(N+P)<=40