-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
GMAT Prep Challenge: Can You Do This Math Problem?
No introduction to this onesee what you can figure out and then well talk about it!
This is a GMATPrep problem from the free exams.
* If n and y are positive integers and [pmath]450y = n^3[/pmath], which of the following must be an integer?I. [pmath]y/{3*2^2*5}[/pmath]
II. [pmath]y/{3^2*2*5}[/pmath]
III. [pmath]y/{3*2*5^2}[/pmath]
(A) None
(B) I only
(C) II only
(D) III only
(E) I, II, and III
In previous weeks, weve been talking about taking a First Glance on Sentence Correction problems. This First Glance works very nicely on quant problems, too!
When the question popped up on the screen, my very first thought was, Ugh, roman numeral!
I hate roman numeral questions and you should, too. They require you to do the work of three problems for the price of one! Whenever I see a roman numeral question, I immediately ask myself, Okay, how hard is the problem? Because if its hard in general, then Im not doing it. Itll take too much time and brain energy.
In other words, my skip! threshold is lower for a roman numeral problem. I have to spot a shortcut or know that the work is not too hard in order to be willing to bother with this kind of problem.
So, my First Glance also tells me that the three roman numeral statements are awfully similar. Maybe I can use that to my advantage. Time to read the problem.
Hmm, Im dealing with integers. I dont understand the significance of that formula yet. Theyre asking what must be an integer
Oh, I get it! The three statements are all fractions and the denominators consist of prime numbers. In order for one of these to be an integer, the numerator, y, has to be divisible by the primes in the denominator. This is a divisibility problem!
Great, I know whats going on and the three statements are similar enough that, once I crack the problem, it shouldnt take me too long to evaluate the statements.
Okay, back to that weird formula. If [pmath]450y = n^3[/pmath], then [pmath]y={n^3}/450[/pmath]. They told me y is an integer, so [pmath]n^3[/pmath] has to be divisible by 450. Time to break that 450 down into its primes.
[pmath]450 = (45)(10) = (3)(3)(5)(2)(5)[/pmath]
And heres where another cool recognition trick comes into play. Ive seen this on other problems before and remembered it. When youre trying to work out divisibility and factors for a squared or cubed number, the factors have to come in pairs (squared) or triplets (cubed).
Go back to the original form of the equation:
[pmath]450y = n^3[/pmath]
[pmath](3)(3)(5)(2)(5)(y) = (n)(n)(n)[/pmath]
Now, each n has to be identical to the other ns, and n itself is an integer, so heres the cool trick: If you know you have any certain prime factor, then you have to have three of those prime factors, one for each n.
In other words, the left side of the equation must include at least three 3's. Only two 3's are included in the 450 figure, so that other 3 must be in y.
Likewise, you must have three 2's and three 5's.
Therefore, y has to contain those extra factors that are missing from 450: 3, 2, 2, and 5.
Great! Well, if y contains 3, 2, 2, and 5, then y must be divisible by those numbers. Check out the roman numerals.
I. [pmath]y/{3*2^2*5}[/pmath]
Yes, y is divisible by 3, 2, 2, and 5. Roman numeral I must be an integer.
Cross off answers (A), (C), and (D).
II. [pmath]y/{3^2*2*5}[/pmath]
Its true that y is divisible by 3, 2, and 5, but y may not contain a second 3. I cant say that this one must be a integer, just that it could be.
Check out the answers again. Answer (E) is also wrong, so (B) must be the correct answereven though you havent evaluated statement III yet!
Now, you have a choice: you can pick (B) and move on, or you can check the third statement, just to make sure you did things correctly. If you have the time, go ahead and check. If youre already over time, pick (B) and move on.
III. [pmath]y/{3*2*5^2}[/pmath]
As with roman numeral II, roman numeral III could represent an integer but doesnt have to. The variable y does have to contain at least one 5, but it may not contain two.
The correct answer is (B).
Key Takeaways: Roman Numeral questions
(1) Be biased. These are often not worth your time. Look for shortcuts or ways to recognize what to do; if the problem looks like its going to be hard and really require you to do three times the work, forget it. Pick your favorite letter and move on.
(2) There are often ways to capitalize on earlier work, though, as we saw in this problem. We had to do a decent amount of upfront work to figure out what to do with the roman numeral statements, but then evaluating those statements was pretty quickand that makes sense because the statements are so very similar.
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009