-
Target Test Prep's 2024 GMAT Focus Edition prep is discounted for the BTG community!
Redeem
GMAT Case Study: Hidden Information in Word Problems
Here's another post in our Knewton GMAT Case Study series, where we dig into the key concepts behind GMAT practice questions. This week: word problems.
After you practice long enough for the GMAT, you may find yourself answering certain common types of problems on autopilot. But always read carefully --sometimes a problem looks like one you've seen a million times before, and yet it's actually about something else altogether.
Lets try out this sample problem:
Eunice sold several cakes. If each cake sold for either exactly 17 or exactly 19 dollars, how many 19-dollar cakes did Eunice sell?
- Eunice sold a total of 8 cakes.
- Eunice made 140 dollars in total revenue from her cakes.
(A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.
(B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.
(C) BOTH statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked.
(D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked.
(E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed.
(Try it out for yourself, then read on for the full explanation...)
Ready?
If you chose option C for this problem, you wouldnt be alone. Youve probably had it drilled into your head (especially if youre a Knewton student) that if you have two variables and only one equation, you cant solve for both variables. In this problem, youve got two unknown quantities (the number of 17-dollar cakes and the number of 19-dollar cakes that Eunice sold), and you automatically expect to need two separate equations to find those numbers.
But sometimes, particularly in tricky word problems like this one, the GMAT actually gives you more information than you realize. A problem like this, that seems to be testing the simple concept of an insufficient system of equations, for example, is actually testing you on your ability to understand number properties.
The difference in this problem is that the word several in the question stem refers to integers. Eunice could have sold three cakes, or three hundred, but even so, theres a big difference between, for example, Eunice sold several cakes and Eunice used a certain amount of flour to make her cake. She can only sell her cakes in whole numbers.
So theres an infinite set of numbers that cant be the answer to this question: 3.5, , 7. (Of course, theres still pretty much an infinite set that could; even if its unlikely that Eunice sold, say, a million cakes all by herself, we cant rule the possibility out.) Still, youve eliminated a whole lot of answers before you even get to the statements. As youll see, this thought process is key to arriving at the correct answer.
Now, lets evaluate the statements.
Statement 1 says that Eunice sold a total of 8 cakes. But this tells you nothing about what each cake cost. Half of them could have cost 17 dollars, or maybe all but one. So statement 1 is definitely insufficient, even though there are only a few possible answers (1, 2, 3, 4, up to 8).
Statement 2 says that Eunice made 140 dollars total. If this were a regular algebra problem, and not a word problem, you might write something like this: 17x + 19y = 140, where x and y were the numbers of 17- and 19-dollar cakes. And in that case, you would be able to graph all the solutions to this equation on a line, which means that there would be infinite solutions.
But you know that x and y are integers, and that theyre positive (otherwise Eunice would be buying cakes from her own customers, which isnt a great business model!). So instead of using straight algebra, use this information to figure out how many cakes Eunice sold.
First, 17 goes into 140 about 8 times. If Eunice sold 8 cakes for 17 dollars each, shed make 8 * 17 = 136. But if she sells any more than that, say 9, her least possible revenue is 17 * 9 = 153. So she couldnt have sold more than 8 cakes, because she would have made at least 153 dollars. Meanwhile, 19 goes into 140 about 7 times. If Eunice sells only 7 cakes, she makes, at most, 7 * 19 = 133. So she couldnt have sold 7 or fewer cakes.
Youve narrowed it down: Eunice must have sold 8 cakes. Now you can figure out how many of each type she sold using a simple system of equations: x + y = 8 and 17x + 19y = 140.
In fact, you could stop here. 2 equations with 2 variables is clearly sufficient information, so answer choice B is correct. But heres a quick explanation of how to solve the system (just remember not to worry about solving on test day instead, move on as soon as possible after establishing sufficiency!).
x + y = 8 becomes x = 8 y (remember youre looking for y, so substitute x). Next, plug that into the other equation: 17(8 - y) + 19y = 140, or 136 + 2y = 140. Then you have y = 2, so Eunice sold 2 19-dollar cakes.
Wait, you might be thinking. What if I happened to find this same combination intuitively? I wouldnt have had to go through all these steps. Thats the difference between problem solving, where guess-and-check often works fine, and Data Sufficiency, where you have to know for sure that theres only one possible answer. So you would still have to make sure that it was impossible for any integer number of cakes to have been sold other than 8.
The takeaway?
Counting words, like several, and any discrete objects that appear in a word problem are your tip-off that youre dealing with integers. It may seem strange since a majority of GMAT problems have integer solutions regardless, but knowing that the solution is an integer is a key piece of information to solve many problems!
Read Other Knewton "GMAT Case Study" Articles:
Recent Articles
Archive
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009