-
Target Test Prep's 2024 GMAT Focus Edition prep is discounted for the BTG community!
Redeem
How To Turn Algebra Into Arithmetic
I have never met anyone who is better at algebra than he or she is at arithmetic. As good as a person may be with algebra, that persons going to be even better with real numbers (arithmetic). How can we use that to our advantage on the test?
Algebra and arithmetic are very similar, but algebra uses variables where arithmetic would use real numbers. On certain GMAT problems, we can take a problem in which we were given variables and use real numbers instead were turning algebra into arithmetic!
Note: a lot of my students will complain that this method takes too much time. Of course it does when you first start studying it. Youve been doing algebra for years, but most of you are just learning how to turn algebra into arithmetic. Think how slow you were when you first started learning algebra. Put in the practice and youll pick up the speed!
Recognize when you can turn algebra into arithmetic
First, we need to know when we can use this technique. Its possible to use this technique when there are variable expressions in the answers. Variable expressions do use variables but do not contain an equals sign or an inequality sign. For example, x+3 is a variable expression; x+y = 3 is not a variable expression but a variable equation.
You can sometimes pick your own numbers even when a variable isnt given in the problem for example, when the answers are in the form of fractions or percentages of something. In these problems, youd have to introduce a variable (or variables) yourself in order to solve or you could just pick a real number. For instance, I could talk about the changing price of a TV set: first it goes up by 5% and then it goes down by 10%. And I might ask: what fraction of the original price is the new price? You can tell me that without knowing any real numbers! (In fact, you can tell me just based on the info Ive given you in this paragraph.)
If they give you variable expressions in the answers, or if the problem keeps talking about some number but never gives you a real number for it, and the answers are in the form of a fraction or percentage of the original, then you may want to turn this problem into arithmetic.
Deciding whether to turn algebra into arithmetic
After we determine that we can use this method, we next have to decide whether we want to do so on this particular problem. There isnt a one-size-fits-all answer to this question; different students will prefer different things. The very general rule is that you use algebra on problems that are easier (for you) and you use arithmetic on problems that are harder (for you). The particular line, though, is different for every student. So how do you decide?
You figure it out while youre studying. From now on, every time you see a problem that can be done using this method, try it both ways the algebra and the arithmetic. Then decide which way was easier for you on this problem and, as specifically as possible, why. And how are you going to remember that for future? (Hint: drill, baby, drill!) Then, when you see a similar future problem, youll already have made the decision as to which method to use.
Turning algebra into arithmetic
Okay, so lets do it, already! First, we see how many variables we have and whether we need to pick for all of them or whether some will be determined by others. For example, if a problem talks about a cell phone plan costing x cents per minute and Jamie talked for y minutes last month, then Im going to pick for both of the variables in the problem. If, on the other hand, the problem tells me that x+y = a, then I know Im only going to pick for x and y; after that, a will be determined.
Picking Numbers
Next, Im going to be smart about picking my numbers. Full disclosure: the main drawback to this turn algebra into arithmetic method is that, if Im very unlucky, I could happen to pick some number that will work for more than one answer choice. This cant happen on every problem, but it can happen sometimes. I can reduce the chances to almost zero, though, if Im smart about picking my numbers.
Dont pick zero. Dont pick one. Dont pick a number that already shows up in the problem. Dont pick a number that would result in a calculation that gives you that same number again. For example, a percentage problem asks you to reduce the price of a TV set by a certain percentage and then do something with the new price relative to the amount saved off of the original price. You probably dont want to discount that TV set by 50%, because then both the amount saved and the new price are the same number!
Other than that, though, make your life as easy as you can. Pick small integers. If you need to pick more than one, choose numbers with slightly different characteristics an even and an odd, for instance. If a number needs to be divided at some point, pick something that will still give you an integer after you divide.
When youre studying, go back over what numbers really worked well or really didnt. How could you have known, before you started solving, that picking 2 on this one was probably not a great idea? Or, conversely, that picking 2 on this other one was a great idea?
Doing the Arithmetic
Okay, now youve got your real number or numbers. (Youve written them down clearly on your scrap paper, along with your variables, right?) Now, do the arithmetic. Wherever the problem says x, you now use 2, and wherever the problem say y, you now use 3. When youre done, youve got a numerical answer.
But this is all too abstract. Take a look at this GMATPrep problem:
*Before being simplified, the instructions for computing income tax in country R were to add 2 percent of ones annual income to the average (arithmetic mean) of 100 units of country Rs currency and 1 percent of ones annual income. Which of the following represents the simplified formula for computing the income tax, in country Rs currency, for a person in that country whose annual income is I?(A) 50 + I/200
(B) 50 + 3I/100
(C) 50 + I/40
(D) 100 + I/50
(E) 100 + 3I/100
Note: a full discussion of the above problem, including the algebraic solution method, can be found here.
I have one variable, I, and this is a percent problem. 100 is usually a nice number in a percent problem, but this problem uses the number 100 in this formula Im supposed to find so Im going to use something different on this one. I also have to calculate 1% and 2%, so I dont want to go smaller than 100 or Im going to have fractions; lets go bigger instead. And, hey, Im eventually going to have to divide this I variable by 200, 100, 40, and 50 (look at the answers!), so lets use 200. Now, 200 = ones annual income.
add 2% of ones annual income okay, so thats 200*2% = 4.
Next, take the average (arithmetic mean) of 100 units of country Rs currency and 1 percent of ones annual income okay, so 1% of ones annual income is 200*1% = 2, and Im going to average 2 and 100. Thats (100+2)/2 = 51.
Now I add those two together: 4 + 51 = 55. Thats my target answer. I have to find which answer choice equals 55, and I do that by substituting 200 in wherever the answer says I.
Note: I do not care what the five individual answers are: only whether they are (or might be) my target answer. If I can tell before finishing an answer that it is not going to equal 55, then I cross off that answer and move on.
(A) 50 + I/200: 50 + 200/200 = 50 + 1 = 51. Nope.
(B) 50 + 3I/100: 50 + 3(200)/100 = 50+6 = 56. So close! But this isnt right either.
(C) 50 + I/40: 50 + 200/40 = 50 + 5 = 55. Bingo!
(D) 100 + I/50: Lets check just in case 100 + something? No. Too big.
(E) 100 + 3I/100: Ditto. 100 + something is too big.
The correct answer is C.
Notice that I did test D and E, even after finding that C worked. Here, we have to make a choice. Do we want to be thorough and make sure we didnt hit the rare case where more than one answer works? Or are we satisfied with C and want to move on? Generally, if I feel as though I havent used up my time yet, Ill be thorough; this is the same as quickly checking my work on another problem when I feel I have the time to do so. If, however, I feel as though Im already over my time limit and Im not 100% confident anyway, then Ill just stop as soon as I find one that works thats good enough and Im almost certain to be right.
Again: if you follow my rules about picking numbers, then its extremely unlikely that you will be so unlucky as to choose a number that works with more than one answer! If you do somehow find yourself in that situation, you can do one of two things: guess one of those two answers, or try a different number (and switch it up pick an even if you picked an odd last time). Do the math again (itll be fast, because youve already done it once!) and then test just those two answers.
Take-Aways
- You can turn algebra problems into arithmetic problems. The process is straightforward, though it does take practice to become efficient.
- Know how to choose between algebra and arithmetic and know that this is based on your individual level. When studying, try problems both ways to determine which way is best for you in different situations.
p.s. The answer to that TV set question is 94.5%. Pick the number 100 as your starting point for the price of the TV set. 5% of 100 is 5, so first the price rises to 100+5 = 105. Next, the price falls by 10%. 10% of 105 is 10.5, so the new price of the TV set is 105 10.5 = 94.5. My questions was what fraction of the original price is the new price? My new price is 94.5 and my original price was 100. 94.5 / 100 = 94.5%.
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009