-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
How to Analyze a GMATPrep CR Question
Last year, we discussed how to study individual practice problems in the article How to Analyze a Practice Problem. Someone recently asked me to demonstrate this process via an actual Critical Reasoning problem, so thats what were going to do this week: discuss how to analyze and master a particular GMATPrep CR problem.
First, set your timer for 2 minutes and try this GMATPrep problem:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. The chief executive is, therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that
(A) problems should be solved at the level in the management hierarchy at which they occur
(B) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
(C) problem-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
(D) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from no source other than their subordinates
(E) some employees are more concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors
After trying the problem, checking the answer, and reading and understanding the solution (if available), I try to answer these questions:
1. Did I know WHAT they were trying to test?
Was I able to CATEGORIZE this question by topic and subtopic? By process / technique? If I had to look something up in my books, would I know exactly where to go?
- The question is a Find the Assumption CR question because the word assumption appears in the question stem. If I dont remember how to do Find the Assumption questions, Id go look in my book right now. If I had previously studied wrong answer choice types for Assumption questions, Id also note which wrong answer choice types (if any) I recognized in this problem.
Did I COMPREHEND the symbols, text, questions, statements, and answer choices? Can I comprehend it all now, when I have lots of time to think about it? What do I need to do to make sure that I do comprehend everything here? How am I going to remember whatever I've just learned for future?
- The first sentence of the argument is a premise its designed to support what the author wants to claim. The second sentence is the conclusion what the author is actually claiming. The author didnt give any opposing information in this argument.
Did I understand the actual CONTENT (facts, knowledge) being tested?
- CR questions dont test particular facts, but they do test my knowledge of what Im supposed to do on this type of CR question. On Find the Assumption questions, I need to find the answer that the author believes to be true, and that answer must also be something that is necessary in order for the author to draw his conclusion. If the author doesnt have to believe the answer, then that answer isnt necessary in order for the author to draw the conclusion.
2. How well did I HANDLE what they were trying to test?
Did I choose the best APPROACH? Or is there a better way to do the problem? (There's almost always a better way!) What is that better way? How am I going to remember this better approach the next time I see a similar problem?
- I forgot to read the question first, as I should have done I read the argument first and only then read the question. Reading the question first allows me to categorize the argument immediately and have a better idea of what is important as I read through the argument. In some cases, reading the question first also tells me what the conclusion is (though not in this case). I need to make a note to read the question first every time and practice till it becomes a habit. Also, I dont think I diagrammed (took notes) in the best way that I could have (see careless mistakes below).
Did I have the SKILLS to follow through? Or did I fall short on anything?
- I didnt actually remember that the correct answer would have to be necessary in order for the author to draw his conclusion. Because of that, I think I fell into a trap. I should also spend a bit more time studying the characteristics of wrong answers (see below).
Did I make any careless mistakes? If so, WHY did I make each mistake? What habits could I make or break to minimize the chances of repeating that careless mistake in future?
- I didnt immediately note that the first sentence gave a cause-and-effect scenario. That messed me up later because I didnt note that the sequence of the argument was X --> Y --> Z, not just a bunch of stuff leads to Z. The word because at the beginning of the argument should have been my clue that even the premise was cause and effect. First, Im going to re-write the notes the way they should have been done, then Im going to make a list of all of the words that I can think of that signal cause-and-effect, and then Im going to scan through some old CRs Ive already done to try to spot cause-effect premises. (And, of course, I will keep an eye on this issue when I do future problems.)
For verbal, the following two questions can be combined:
Am I comfortable with OTHER STRATEGIES that would have worked, at least partially? How should I have made an educated guess?
Do I understand every TRAP & TRICK that the writer built into the question, including wrong answers?
- Answer A is tempting to choose because it seems like a pretty good assumption to make in the real world; Answer A is wrong, though, because how the problems should be solved doesnt tell me anything about how well-informed the chief executive is about those problems.
- Answer B is tempting to choose because it sounds like a good way to resolve the problem described in the argument. Answer B is wrong, though, because we werent asked to resolve the problem; we were asked to articulate a belief (an assumption) of the author who is pointing out the problem.
- Answer C is tempting to choose because it sounds like a pretty good assumption to make in the real world. Answer C is wrong, though, because the ability to solve a problem still doesnt tell me anything about how well-informed the chief executive is about those problems.
- Answer choice D is tempting to eliminate because it sounds like a pretty bad assumption to make in the real world; its probably not true that a CEO only gets info from subordinates. Answer D is right, though, because this is exactly the (bad!) assumption that the author makes to draw his conclusion. If CEOs really cant get info from anyone other than their subordinates, and if those subordinates dont want to tell them any bad news, then those CEOs are not going to be well-informed about problems.
- Answer choice E is tempting to choose because it is undoubtedly true in the real world some people will tell their bosses the complete truth about problems. Answer choice E is wrong, though, because it weakens the argument: if some subordinates are speaking up, then the bosses arent less well-informed. We were asked to find an assumption, and an assumption is something the author must believe to be true in order to draw that conclusion. If the answer choice actually weakens the conclusion, then that answer cant be a valid assumption (and now I know thats true for all future Assumption questions!).
3. How well did I or could I RECOGNIZE what was going on?
Did I make a CONNECTION to previous experience? If so, what problem(s) did this remind me of and what, precisely, was similar? Or did I have to do it all from scratch? If so, see the next bullet.
- Yes. I recognized that this was an assumption question because Id studied how assumption questions are typically worded. I should have recognized more though (see below).
Can I make any CONNECTIONS now, while I'm analyzing the problem? What have I done in the past that is similar to this one? How are they similar? How could that recognition have helped me to do this problem more efficiently or effectively? (This may involve looking up some past problem and making comparisons between the two!)
- I could have done better with recognizing the X Y Z setup more quickly so that I could have taken more clear notes. I also fell into a sounds good in the real world trap that caused me to pick the wrong answer, as well as a sounds bad in the real world trap that caused me to eliminate the right answer. In the future, I will know that how it sounds in the real world is not a good reason to pick or eliminate an answer.
HOW will I recognize similar problems in the future? What can I do now to maximize the chances that I will remember and be able to use lessons learned from this problem the next time I see a new problem that tests something similar?
- I need to do everything I already described in my notes above. Im also going to go back and look through some old Assumption problems that Ive already done. Ill identify why each answer is tempting (to choose or eliminate, as appropriate) and why its actually right or wrong, looking to see if I can recognize the kinds of traps I identified on this problem (especially the sounds wrong in the real world right answer!).
And thats it! Note that, of course, the details above are specific to each individual person such a write-up would be different for every single one of you, depending upon your particular strengths, weaknesses, and mistakes. Hopefully, though, this gives you a better idea of the way to analyze a problem. This framework also gives you a valuable way to discuss problems with fellow online students or in study groups this is the kind of discussion that really helps to maximize scores.
* GMATPrep question courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009