Bing Crosby and Russ Columbo

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:710

Bing Crosby and Russ Columbo

by rahulg83 » Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:40 am
It was not long after the 1930s commenced that such baritone singers as Bing Crosby and Russ Columbo contributed to the popularization of a type of romantic, soothing singing that came to be called “crooning.”

A)It was not long after the 1930s commenced that such baritone singers as Bing Crosby and Russ Columbo contributed to

B)Not long after the commencement of the decade of the 1930s, baritone singers such as Bing Crosby and also Russ Columbo decided to contribute in

C)Not long after the 1930s commenced, baritone singers like Bing Crosby and Russ Columbo contributed to

D)Not long after the beginning of the 1930s commencement, baritone singers like Bing Crosby and Russ Columbo had contributed to

E)It was not long after the 1930s commenced that baritone singers such as Bing Crosby and Russ Columbo had contributed in.

I was able to naarrow down between A and B, but rejected A because of "It is/was...that..." usage, which Manhattan says is avoided by the GMAT. I understand B is awkward. Can someone shed some light on when to use "It is/was...that..." ?

P.S. :This question has already been discussed here https://www.beatthegmat.com/baritone-singer-t25236.html.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:06 am
IMO...B is incorrect because it changes the meaning....

B says that singers decided....now after they decided....they could or could not have actually contributed...

original sentence says that they did....

But I am not sure abt the is/was..that...part....

as far as I remember there are no question in OG kicking out any answer based on this.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:32 am
In the above link of BTG that Rahul posted.......I found the following reasoning....which is given by Manhattan....

As per the reasoning given below for option B....Manhattan says that "and also" is non idiomatic....

But as per OG-10, Q216....OG says it is perfectly OK to use "and also" for parallel list....

OG says: To convey the idea that shifting a portion of health-benefit costs back to workers has two complementary effects,
the correct sentence must link grammatically parallel statements of these effects with and also or with not only ... but also.

Can someone please tell what is the correct case ?
Feruza Matyakubova wrote:The original sentence correctly uses the simple past tense “contributed” to refer to an event that occurred in the past. Furthermore, the original sentence correctly uses “such as” to refer to specific baritone singers who made a contribution to the popularization of the “crooning” style of singing.

(A) CORRECT. As explained above, this choice uses the proper verb tense and is idiomatically correct.

(B) This choice is wordy, awkward, and redundant. Since the 1930s is a decade, there is no reason to state “of the decade.” Similarly, if baritone singers such as Bing Crosby and Russ Columbo contributed, it is unnecessary to say they “decided” to contribute. Furthermore, this choice makes two errors in idiomatic construction: the “and also” construction is unidiomatic – the word “also” should be eliminated, and “contribute in” should be “contribute to.”

(C) This choice uses the unidiomatic “like” to refer to specific baritone singers. On the GMAT, “like” means “similar to,” while “such as” refers to specific examples.

(D) Stating “the beginning of the 1930s commencement” is redundant, since “beginning” and “commencement” are synonyms. Furthermore, this choice incorrectly uses “like” instead of the idiomatic "such as" to refer to specific baritone singers. Finally, it incorrectly shifts to the past perfect “had contributed,” which would only be correct if they “had contributed” prior to some other action in the simple past tense; here there is no such simple past tense verb.

(E) In this choice, “contributed in” is unidiomatic; the proper construction is “contributed to.” Furthermore, this choice incorrectly uses the past perfect “had contributed,” which would only be correct if they “had contributed” prior to some other action in the simple past tense, such as “the 1930s commenced.” This verb tense usage reverses the intended order of events: this choice clearly indicates that they contributed “not long after” the 1930s commenced.

One question: 4meonly, do you know whether Manhattan CAT tests are considred to be more difficult than the real test?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:22 am
Choice B should be eliminated due to excessive wordiness... commencement of the decade of the 1930's is a mouthful which isn't necessary.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:33 am
Experts kindly tell is "and also" wrong in GMAT or not ?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:35 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:Experts kindly tell is "and also" wrong in GMAT or not ?
This depends on the context in which it is used, but it seems a bit awkward, especially if it is used as a conjunction.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:37 am
Domnu wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:Experts kindly tell is "and also" wrong in GMAT or not ?
This depends on the context in which it is used, but it seems a bit awkward, especially if it is used as a conjunction.
But as per OG-10, Q216....OG says it is perfectly OK to use "and also" for parallel list....

OG says: To convey the idea that shifting a portion of health-benefit costs back to workers has two complementary effects,
the correct sentence must link grammatically parallel statements of these effects with and also or with not only ... but also....

But Manhattan has different story to tell....as I mentioned above...

• Page 1 of 1