BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 SC 779 - Compare to vs compare with

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570
by reply2spg » Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:11 am
The metabolic rate of sharks is low compared with the rates of most other fishes.

(A) with the rates of most other fishes

(B) to most other fishes' rate

(C) to that of rates for most other fishes

(D) to most other fishes

(E) with most other fishes

OA A what is wrong with B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 amFollowed by: 34 members
Thanked: 128 times
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:39 am
The only thing I can see wrong with B is that its not structurally parallel to the first part of the original sentence
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:43 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: New York City
Thanked: 18 times

by josh@knewton » Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:47 am
The answer is A for two main reasons.

1) When stressing the differences between two things, use compare with rather than compare to. The differences between the two rates are emphasized here, so with is correct. Compare to is used more to point out similarities between two things. The doctor compared her metabolism to that of a hibernating bear. Though a person and a bear are quite different, using to stresses that their metabolisms are similar.

2) The rate of the shark (singular) is compared to rates of other, plural, fishes. All other fishes do not have the same, singular rate. Just as you wouldn't say "My house is bigger than most of my neighbors' house," unless most other fishes share a rate, the fishes' rate compared in B does not make sense.

Hopefully helpful,
Josh
Josh Anish
Senior Editor, Knewton
https://www.knewton.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:43 pm
Thanks Josh. It is clear now.
josh@knewton wrote:The answer is A for two main reasons.

1) When stressing the differences between two things, use compare with rather than compare to. The differences between the two rates are emphasized here, so with is correct. Compare to is used more to point out similarities between two things. The doctor compared her metabolism to that of a hibernating bear. Though a person and a bear are quite different, using to stresses that their metabolisms are similar.

2) The rate of the shark (singular) is compared to rates of other, plural, fishes. All other fishes do not have the same, singular rate. Just as you wouldn't say "My house is bigger than most of my neighbors' house," unless most other fishes share a rate, the fishes' rate compared in B does not make sense.

Hopefully helpful,
Josh
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:33 am
So can we conclude that Compare with is used to describe the differences between like things and compare to is used to describe the similarities between unlike things.
josh@knewton wrote:The answer is A for two main reasons.

1) When stressing the differences between two things, use compare with rather than compare to. The differences between the two rates are emphasized here, so with is correct. Compare to is used more to point out similarities between two things. The doctor compared her metabolism to that of a hibernating bear. Though a person and a bear are quite different, using to stresses that their metabolisms are similar.

2) The rate of the shark (singular) is compared to rates of other, plural, fishes. All other fishes do not have the same, singular rate. Just as you wouldn't say "My house is bigger than most of my neighbors' house," unless most other fishes share a rate, the fishes' rate compared in B does not make sense.

Hopefully helpful,
Josh
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1