BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

scholarship

Expert replies

by loveusonu » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:11 pm
kevincanspain wrote: Officials at the United States Mint believe that the Sacagawea dollar coin will be used more as a substitute for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than four quarters, which weigh
5.67 grams each.


A. more as a substitute for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than
B. more as a substitute for four quarters than the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than
C. as a substitute for four quarters more than for the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than
D. as a substitute for four quarters more than the dollar bill because its weight of only 8.1 grams is far lighter than it is for
E. as a substitute more for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than it is for
Kevin,
All options seems Incorrect, Suspect some typo..let me know if my elimination is correct. :(

A. more as a substitute for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than
-->INCORRECT: more..than, rather is not required

B. more as a substitute for four quarters than the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than
-->INCORRECT: Incorrect parallelism: more as a substitute, than as a

C. as a substitute for four quarters more than for the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than
-->INCORRECT: The only option which uses correct parallelism, however it should be "far less than weight of four quarters" to have correct comparison.

D. as a substitute for four quarters more than the dollar bill because its weight of only 8.1 grams is far lighter than it is for
-->INCORRECT: same parallelism Error

E. as a substitute more for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than it is for -->INCORRECT: more..than, rather is not required

Am I wrong some where??
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist
Join the discussion

by neonite » Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:31 am
@LoveuSonu

I think u r on the right track, except that the reason you have given for discarding (C) is probably not accurate.

IMO C should be the answer.
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:39 am
kevin,

IMO "C ". Pl. confirm.
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:52 am
OA=C
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by loveusonu » Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:57 am
kevincanspain wrote:OA=C
Kevin,

Could you please explain the logic behind the comparison in C:

"it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than four quarters" -->Far less than modifies the "weight 8.1g", so "weight less than 4 quarters", doesn't sound logically correct to me.

Thanks
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:52 am
loveusonu wrote:
kevincanspain wrote:OA=C
Kevin,

Could you please explain the logic behind the comparison in C:

"it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than four quarters" -->Far less than modifies the "weight 8.1g", so "weight less than 4 quarters", doesn't sound logically correct to me.

Thanks

far less than do four quarters
far less than four quarters weigh

'I weigh less than my sister' is correct, and so is 'I weigh less than my sister does'
Here the verb has been omitted, but the comparison is logical and the omission does not cause confusion

Note, however, that ambiguity would render the following incorrect:
I admire Steve Nash more than my wife.



Kevin has more free time than Lisa (has, does).

I sent my daughter to summer camp and (I sent) my son to summer school.
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:15 pm
Kevin - What's the answer to your question?

I'm between B and D but would go with B because of the "its" in D. Also, B somewhat mimics the original sentence more than D does.
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:16 pm
sorry please disregard. didn't see next page.
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:24 pm
Just to clarify when using "as" for comparisons, there needs to be two ass to create parallelism? as...as

That sentence doesn't sound right but I think it's grammatically correct.
Join the discussion