BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Languages!

Expert replies

by kabirmohammed » Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:12 pm
IMO: C

... but those who have tried to cont(??) typically have found (tried to count what)
... but those who have tried counting it typically find

Plz correct me if iam wrong...
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:45 pm
kabirmohammed wrote:IMO: C

... but those who have tried to cont(??) typically have found (tried to count what)
... but those who have tried counting it typically find

Plz correct me if iam wrong...

From previous posts I figuered that we all agreed that OA should be A, because it in C is singular while the subject of the verb is languages

C is wrong
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Can you explain why is the usage of "them" incorrect please?

IMO - them can refer to sub-languages
Testluv wrote:Hrishi: Because the noun is "language", the pronoun that replaces it should be "it".

Hesham: you are right that the correct idiom is "between x AND y".
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:17 pm
The sentence says that trying to count languages is difficult because within each language there are sub-languages that count as separate languages by themselves, then the sentence says that trying to count yields thousands of languages. So, counting many languages yields thousands of languages because of the sub-languages; how can we use it to count many languages and get thousands of languages.

This seems to be a straight forward, unless I am missing something.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Dec 24, 2009 1:52 pm
received a pm.

Vikas, in my view, it's not really about grammar here. Instead, it's about using your reasoning skills to ascertain the speaker's intended meaning:

The difficulty is in distinguishing between a language and the sub-languages or dialects within [the language].

In other words, it is hard to tell apart the language proper from the sub-languages or dialects that are contained in the language.

Thus, the pronoun in question (it/them) is intended to replace "language" which is singular. Thus, we need "it".
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:05 pm
yeah got it now. I was confused because I thought there is a grammar rule as mentioned by Hrishi in this post.

Can you please refer to that and suggest if it is correct?
Testluv wrote:received a pm.

Vikas, in my view, it's not really about grammar here. Instead, it's about using your reasoning skills to ascertain the speaker's intended meaning:

The difficulty is in distinguishing between a language and the sub-languages or dialects within [the language].

In other words, it is hard to tell apart the language proper from the sub-languages or dialects that are contained in the language.

Thus, the pronoun in question (it/them) is intended to replace "language" which is singular. Thus, we need "it".
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:43 pm
Which one do you think is correct. I have heard that :

if X(singular) and Y(plural) ----then following part should be plural

if X(plural) and Y(singular) ----then following part should be singular.

Looking from the above theory, the option "within them" should be considered.


Hrishi - The answer to the above question would be that when a compound subject consists of two distinct units joined by the conjunction and the verb must be plural.

I got a question in OG where the underlined portion was - few services and little water exists

The explanation given by OG was it should be plural exist.

I hope this clears your doubt
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:09 pm
mehravikas wrote:Which one do you think is correct. I have heard that :

if X(singular) and Y(plural) ----then following part should be plural

if X(plural) and Y(singular) ----then following part should be singular.

Looking from the above theory, the option "within them" should be considered.


Hrishi - The answer to the above question would be that when a compound subject consists of two distinct units joined by the conjunction and the verb must be plural.

I got a question in OG where the underlined portion was - few services and little water exists

The explanation given by OG was it should be plural exist.

I hope this clears your doubt
Yes, that's correct. If you have A and B, then it is a compound subject and requires a plural verb. But if you have A or B, then B determines whether the verb is singular or plural.

So, in this sentence:

"either the coach or the player was..."

But in this sentence:

"either the coach or the players were..."

And this rule for "or" also applies to "nor".
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion