Hello,
For the following:
x^3 < x^2. Describe the possible values of x.
Is this correct?
x^3 < x^2
=> x^3 - x^2 < 0
=> x^2(x - 1) < 0
Since x^2 > 0 => x - 1 < 0 => x < 1 - I
x^2 > 0 = sq. root (x^2) > sq. root (0)
=> +/- x > 0
=> x > 0 or -x > 0
=> x > 0 or x < 0 - II
However, from I and II, I was not sure what the final answer will be.
Can you please help? The answer given is Any non-zero number less than 1
Thanks a lot,
Sri
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
x^3 < x^2 Describe the possible values of x
This topic has expert replies
-
gmattesttaker2
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:52 pm
- Thanked: 11 times
- Followed by:8 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
[email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Sri,
Rather than go about this algebraically, you can TEST VALUES to figure out what's "possible" and what's "not"
X^3 < X^2
Let's start with the obvious: POSITIVE INTEGERS. Will ANY positive integers "fit" this inequality?
X = 1 gives us 1 < 1; this does NOT fit
X = 2 gives us 8 < 4; this does NOT fit
As X becomes a larger positive integer, we run into the same problem: X^3 is NOT < X^2. We've eliminated a set of values. X CANNOT be greater than or equal to 1.
Next, let's try NEGATIVE INTEGERS. There's a great Number Property here...
(Negative)^3 = Negative
(Negative)^2 = Positive
From this, we can deduce that ANY NEGATIVE (integer or non-integer) will "FIT" this inequality.
We're not done though. We still have to deal with 0 and POSITIVE FRACTIONS.
If X = 0, then we have 0 < 0; this does NOT fit.
If X = 1/2, then we have 1/8 < 1/4; this DOES fit. We can also make a deduction from this...
Cubing a positive fraction that is less than 1 IS less than squaring that same positive fraction.
From these TESTS, we've deduced the following:
X CANNOT be a positive integer nor can it be greater than 1
X CANNOT be 0
X CAN be ANY negative
X CAN be ANY positive fraction less than 1
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Rather than go about this algebraically, you can TEST VALUES to figure out what's "possible" and what's "not"
X^3 < X^2
Let's start with the obvious: POSITIVE INTEGERS. Will ANY positive integers "fit" this inequality?
X = 1 gives us 1 < 1; this does NOT fit
X = 2 gives us 8 < 4; this does NOT fit
As X becomes a larger positive integer, we run into the same problem: X^3 is NOT < X^2. We've eliminated a set of values. X CANNOT be greater than or equal to 1.
Next, let's try NEGATIVE INTEGERS. There's a great Number Property here...
(Negative)^3 = Negative
(Negative)^2 = Positive
From this, we can deduce that ANY NEGATIVE (integer or non-integer) will "FIT" this inequality.
We're not done though. We still have to deal with 0 and POSITIVE FRACTIONS.
If X = 0, then we have 0 < 0; this does NOT fit.
If X = 1/2, then we have 1/8 < 1/4; this DOES fit. We can also make a deduction from this...
Cubing a positive fraction that is less than 1 IS less than squaring that same positive fraction.
From these TESTS, we've deduced the following:
X CANNOT be a positive integer nor can it be greater than 1
X CANNOT be 0
X CAN be ANY negative
X CAN be ANY positive fraction less than 1
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The inequality above implies that x≠0.If x³ < x², describe all possible values of x.
Thus, whether x is positive or negative, x²>0, implying that we can safely divide each side by x²:
x³/x² < x²/x²
x < 1.
Thus, x can be equal to any nonzero value less than 1.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
GMATinsight
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
- Location: New Delhi, India
- Thanked: 205 times
- Followed by:24 members
@gmattesttaker2
You didn't have to do any calculation as mentioned below
"Since x^2 > 0 => x - 1 < 0 => x < 1 - I
x^2 > 0 = sq. root (x^2) > sq. root (0)
=> +/- x > 0
=> x > 0 or -x > 0
=> x > 0 or x < 0 - II "
This calculation was a futile exercise because this part has to be positive for any value of x and therefore doesn't lead us to any conclusion except that x should be non zero. Probaly because you did this calculation therefore you got confused.
The first calculation already gave you that x<1 and x has to be non xero for defining the given function therefore the answer you got in half of your exercise already which is "X can be any non zero number less than 1"
Cheers!!!
You didn't have to do any calculation as mentioned below
"Since x^2 > 0 => x - 1 < 0 => x < 1 - I
x^2 > 0 = sq. root (x^2) > sq. root (0)
=> +/- x > 0
=> x > 0 or -x > 0
=> x > 0 or x < 0 - II "
This calculation was a futile exercise because this part has to be positive for any value of x and therefore doesn't lead us to any conclusion except that x should be non zero. Probaly because you did this calculation therefore you got confused.
The first calculation already gave you that x<1 and x has to be non xero for defining the given function therefore the answer you got in half of your exercise already which is "X can be any non zero number less than 1"
Cheers!!!
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
