sc sifting process poe

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Southern California, USA
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:6 members

sc sifting process poe

by resilient » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:23 pm
I went through many questions and and realized where I am lacking. One of my weaknesses is to eliminate and process the wrong answers against each other. Now, does anyone have an approach towards a stellar poe and way to use the wrong answers against each other. My previous successes have been to learn the wrong answers and then you can easily identify the right answer. Can anyone help?
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!

Legendary Member
Posts: 1018
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:19 pm
Thanked: 86 times
Followed by:6 members

by mayonnai5e » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:41 pm
I have some lessons learned about SC in my blog. You might be able to gain some new insights from reading through them again.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/my-blog-erro ... t4899.html
550 =\ ...560 =\... 650 =) ...570 =( ...540 =*( ...680 =P ... 670 =T ...=T... 650 =T ...700 =) ..690 =) ...710 =D ...GMAT 720 DING!! ;D

Learn more about me

Legendary Member
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Southern California, USA
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:6 members

thank you

by resilient » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:57 pm
excellent thank you.
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: sc sifting process poe

by lunarpower » Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:49 am
Enginpasa1 wrote:I went through many questions and and realized where I am lacking. One of my weaknesses is to eliminate and process the wrong answers against each other. Now, does anyone have an approach towards a stellar poe and way to use the wrong answers against each other. My previous successes have been to learn the wrong answers and then you can easily identify the right answer. Can anyone help?
this question is extremely general, to the extent that i'll be able to say little more than platitudes. but i'll have a go:

* you need to get a feeling for the way the correct answers use language. in the same way you might read a favorite magazine and get a sense of its particular writing style, you should, likewise, peruse correct answers (say in the back of the o.g., especially if you've already gone through and done the problems before) until you think you have a better feeling for the way in which they're written. every author has his/her own style, a verity to which the gmat authors are no exception.
- pay particular attention to whatever the o.g. labels as 'awkward' or 'wordy', especially things that you didn't recognize as such. only by studying these diligently can you hope to eliminate them correctly on the actual test.

* as i've said before in connection with one of your earlier posts, you should concentrate on one error at a time. if you try to learn all of the errors in the same study session, you'll most likely end up learning none of them, as your attention will be fatally divided.

* be sure to compare answer choices to each other. there are many subtle errors which you'd never catch if they were presented alone in a line of text, but which become somewhat obvious if they are juxtaposed with answer choices that don't commit them.
- a nice example is #106 in the o.g. verbal supplement (the purple book), in which the extra 'were' is necessary. this is probably not something you'd notice if you were considering this choice in isolation and trying to determine whether it's 'wrong'; only by comparing the choices with were to the choices without it would you likely spot the importance of the difference.

* perhaps memorize 'chapter headings' corresponding to the different subject areas of sentence correction. if you really don't see anything that looks like an error in the choices you have left, maybe just run through the different error types, asking yourself whether each of them, in succession, is in the problem: is there a s-v agreement error? is there a parallelism error? is there a modifier error? etc.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron