strike

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1048
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 am
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
Followed by:27 members
GMAT Score:670

strike

by arora007 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:54 am
source: McGraw Hill's Conquering GMAT Verbal and writing

The city's transit union is contemplating a strike in order to
coerce the mayor into accepting its workers' demands for a
new contract. However, union leaders are aware that a lack
of public support for the union can decrease their leverages in
negotiations.
The answer to which of the following questions would be
LEAST relevant to the transit union's consideration of whether
to strike or not?
A. Does a signi�cant portion of the city's population believe the
union's current contract is unfair?
B. Would the transit strike severely inconvenience a great many of
the city's people?
C. Have previous strikes by the city's transit workers been supported
by the city's residents?
D. Do the residents of the city hold the mayor in high regard?
E. Has the mayor clearly outlined the city's position on the new
contract?

If you choose a choice please explain why.

OA-E
Last edited by arora007 on Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:36 pm
Is the answer E.
All the options except E have something to do with the residents of the city

Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:42 pm
arora007 wrote:source: McGraw Hill's Conquering GMAT Verbal and writing

The city's transit union is contemplating a strike in order to
coerce the mayor into accepting its workers' demands for a
new contract. However, union leaders are aware that a lack
of public support for the union can decrease their leverages in
negotiations.
The answer to which of the following questions would be
LEAST relevant to the transit union's consideration of whether
to strike or not?
A. Does a signi�cant portion of the city's population believe the
union's current contract is unfair?
B. Would the transit strike severely inconvenience a great many of
the city's people?
C. Have previous strikes by the city's transit workers been supported
by the city's residents?
D. Do the residents of the city hold the mayor in high regard?
E. Has the mayor clearly outlined the city's position on the new
contract?

If you choose a choice please explain why.
is the answer E?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:38 am
Thanked: 10 times

by Shawshank » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:07 am
Confused betwn E and B

IMO -- B

I Feel the city people's inconvenience would count the least..
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:09 am
Thanked: 2 times

by kamalsinghy » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:20 am
IMO E.

In evaluate the argument kind of questions, answer the options in yes/no and check how it impacts the conclusion of the argument.

A. relevant.
B. if the strike inconveniences the people, then they are not going to support the union. so relevant.
C. relevant. i.e. any option that is going to have some impact on general public is relevant to evaluate the argument.
D. relevant.
E. Not relevant much.

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:16 am
IMO C

how the previous strike can be a base for the current strike ??

E : looks related to the argument. If mayor has outlined the city's position then the union can get the support from the city residents.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:3 members

by FightWithGMAT » Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:16 pm
arora007 wrote:source: McGraw Hill's Conquering GMAT Verbal and writing

The city's transit union is contemplating a strike in order to
coerce the mayor into accepting its workers' demands for a
new contract. However, union leaders are aware that a lack
of public support for the union can decrease their leverages in
negotiations.
The answer to which of the following questions would be
LEAST relevant to the transit union's consideration of whether
to strike or not?
A. Does a signi�cant portion of the city's population believe the
union's current contract is unfair?
B. Would the transit strike severely inconvenience a great many of
the city's people?
C. Have previous strikes by the city's transit workers been supported
by the city's residents?
D. Do the residents of the city hold the mayor in high regard?
E. Has the mayor clearly outlined the city's position on the new
contract?

If you choose a choice please explain why.

OA-E
Conclusion talks about public support.
A, B, C and D all suggest that either the union will get public support or would not.
E is odd man out here.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:12 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by deeyah » Fri Jul 16, 2010 4:52 pm
Answer E
All other options take into consideration the residents of the city.