Doctor!

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
Thanked: 127 times
Followed by:14 members

Doctor!

by gmat_perfect » Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:28 pm
A patient accusing a doctor of malpractice will find it difficult to prove damage if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify about proper medical proce¬dures.

(A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify
(B) unless there will be another doctor to testify
(C) without another doctor's testimony
(D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor
(E) lacking another doctor to testify

[spoiler]OA: C[/spoiler]

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:45 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:710

by TheGmatTutor » Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:59 pm
You didn't underline the sentence, but it looks like C.
If this post was helpful, please click the "Thanks" button.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

by uwhusky » Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:27 pm
Please be more specific than just providing an answer, which doesn't really help the readers or the person who posted the question.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 10:04 am
Thanked: 5 times

by apex231 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:37 pm
(A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify
(B) unless there will be another doctor to testify
(C) without another doctor's testimony
(D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor -> should represents obligation.
(E) lacking another doctor to testify

C wins.