GMAT ETS Question

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 3:19 am

GMAT ETS Question

by bobs21 » Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:05 am
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September,slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

A) less than they did
B) less than it did
C) less than they were
D) lower than
E) lower than they were

I'm a lil' confused...isn't 'less' to be used when we have an uncountable item? In other words something which is close to 2.8 percent is countable right? Please help me in clarifying the usage of 'less'.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:29 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

by optimisticsam » Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:31 pm
I believe less is used when you have non-countable item.

As in "I was less happy with the result."

I think because they don't actually state how much less the unemployment was, there is nothing to count?

Correct?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:01 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

Ans....

by jangojess » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:41 am
is D the ans??? we're talking abt percentage which is countable...and so lower (such as lower rate of interest, lower percentage of marks) should be used...
Trying hard!!!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 5:35 am
Thanked: 2 times

Re: GMAT ETS Question

by hopefully » Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:48 am
bobs21 wrote:Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September,slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

A) less than they did
B) less than it did
C) less than they were
D) lower than
E) lower than they were

I'm a lil' confused...isn't 'less' to be used when we have an uncountable item? In other words something which is close to 2.8 percent is countable right? Please help me in clarifying the usage of 'less'.
IMO it should be "A"..

Less can be used to quote statistics... Read saahils notes for ore such exceptions..
To compare with Costs rose we need they ( for plural costs) did ....
Live every moment ...

<a href="https://www.beatthegmat.com/viewtopic.ph ... target=new> My 730 </a>

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:27 pm

Re: GMAT ETS Question

by dingo001 » Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:13 am
bobs21 wrote:Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September,slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

A) less than they did
B) less than it did
C) less than they were
D) lower than
E) lower than they were

I'm a lil' confused...isn't 'less' to be used when we have an uncountable item? In other words something which is close to 2.8 percent is countable right? Please help me in clarifying the usage of 'less'.
Should be D, lower than is countable and so are employment numbers. And D is succinct compared with E

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Denver, CO

by dpatwa » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:09 am
What's the OA? I think the answer is A. My problem with D is that it's unclear as to what was lower, the actual costs or the rise in the costs.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 3:19 am

by bobs21 » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:28 am
Sorry for the late reply...the OA is A.

Moderator
Posts: 772
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:29 pm
Followed by:6 members

by BTGmoderatorRO » Wed Nov 15, 2017 12:25 pm
Option A.
'they' is a third person plural pronoun and it only attracts a group of people, animals, plants, or objects.So according to the above question 'they' would not fit not be fit for the best option. What the writer was referring to is neither a person, animal, plant or any object.Thus, this option is incorrect.

option B.
Here, there's a change of hand. From 'they' to 'it' which is the best what to illustrate a figure.Thus, this is the correct answer.

Option C.
It will be grammatically incorrect to pluralize a figure or numbers. Example: Four divided by two is two. Not Four divided by two are two.

Option D. lower than???? still talking about the issue of numbers here. 'less than' will be considered first before 'lower than'
This option is incorrect!!!

Option E.
This option suffers the same fate as option D above likewise, it also contains some errors which is the verb 'were' this is a plural past tense verb, and does not suits the writer's opinion.