"An independent audit found no indication of tax avoidance on the part of the firm in the firm's accounts, therefore no such problem exists."
The questionable reasoning in the argument above is most closely paralleled by that in which one of the following?
(A) The plan for the introduction of the new product has been unmodified so far; therefore, it will not be modified in the future.
(B) The overall budget for the projects has been exceeded by a large amount; therefore, at least one of the projects has exceeded its budget by large amount.
(C) A compilation of the best student essays of the year includes no essays on current events; therefore, students have become apathetic toward current events.
(D) A survey of schools in the district found no school without a need for building repair; therefore, the education provided to students in this district is substandard.
(E) An examination of the index of the book found no listing for the most prominent critic of the theory the book advocates; therefore, the book fails to refer to that critic. E
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
CR : An independent audit found no indication
This topic has expert replies
-
deloitte247
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
The options above us with a decision to choose which is contrary to the writer's position.
Option A:- Incorrect
It is not correct to say that something hasn't been done ordinarily means it will never be done in the forseeable future. It runs parallel to the subject state of the writer.
Option B:- Incorrect
Very true when compared to the original content of reasoning . The content has been exceeded and in reality one of the figures must have been hiked. This is not a contrary statement when placed side by side with the question passage.
Option C:- Incorrect
It doesn't necessarily translate to the inability of current events to affect the students in parts and whole. it's still not what we desired to to get.
Option D:- Incorrect
substandard buildings (classrooms and other building facilities) could impair the students and affect their education. It's still a consistent statement compared to the question statement.
Option E:- correct
The option happened to be the most consistent with the reality of this option having a contrary submission to the writer's view.
Option A:- Incorrect
It is not correct to say that something hasn't been done ordinarily means it will never be done in the forseeable future. It runs parallel to the subject state of the writer.
Option B:- Incorrect
Very true when compared to the original content of reasoning . The content has been exceeded and in reality one of the figures must have been hiked. This is not a contrary statement when placed side by side with the question passage.
Option C:- Incorrect
It doesn't necessarily translate to the inability of current events to affect the students in parts and whole. it's still not what we desired to to get.
Option D:- Incorrect
substandard buildings (classrooms and other building facilities) could impair the students and affect their education. It's still a consistent statement compared to the question statement.
Option E:- correct
The option happened to be the most consistent with the reality of this option having a contrary submission to the writer's view.
