"Life expectancy" is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, whereas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days, people must have been considered old at age that we now consider the prime of life.
Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?
a. In the middle of the nineteenth century, the population of North America was significantly smaller than is today.
b. Most of the gains in life expectancy in the last 150 years have come from reductions in the number of infants who die in their first year of life.
c. Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was unknown in the nineteenth century.
d. the proportion of people who die in their seventies is significantly smaller today than is the proportion of people who die in their eighties.
e. More people in the middle of the nineteenth century engaged regularly in vigorous physical activity than do so today.
OA: B
OG 12 CR#1: "Life expectancy" is the average age a
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The argument assumes that there is only one explanation for the increase in average life expectancy:RBBmba@2014 wrote:"Life expectancy" is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, whereas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days, people must have been considered old at age that we now consider the prime of life.
Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?
a. In the middle of the nineteenth century, the population of North America was significantly smaller than is today.
b. Most of the gains in life expectancy in the last 150 years have come from reductions in the number of infants who die in their first year of life.
c. Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was unknown in the nineteenth century.
d. the proportion of people who die in their seventies is significantly smaller today than is the proportion of people who die in their eighties.
e. More people in the middle of the nineteenth century engaged regularly in vigorous physical activity than do so today.
In the 19th century, a person 40 years of age -- what is now considered the prime of life -- would be considered old.
In other words:
Few people in the 19th century lived beyond 40 years of age.
One way to weaken the conclusion is to suggest an ALTERNATE EXPLANATION for the increase in average life expectancy.
B: Most of the gains in life expectancy in the last 150 years have come from reductions in the number of infants who die in their first year of life.
Implication:
In the 19th century, there were a greater number of infant deaths, suggesting an ALTERNATE EXPLANATION for the lower life expectancy in those days and WEAKENING the conclusion that few people in the 19th century lived beyond 40 years of age.
The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Hi Mitch,
Could you please clarify why EXACTLY Option C is considered wrong ?
Doesn't Option C mean that people in the 19th century weren't really old at the time of their death, rather they died young/early because of lack of medical technology that saves people in present times, making the the AVERAGE "Life expectancy" higher now.
It seems to be that Option C is pretty close!
Look forward to your thoughts.
Could you please clarify why EXACTLY Option C is considered wrong ?
Doesn't Option C mean that people in the 19th century weren't really old at the time of their death, rather they died young/early because of lack of medical technology that saves people in present times, making the the AVERAGE "Life expectancy" higher now.
It seems to be that Option C is pretty close!
Look forward to your thoughts.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
C: Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was unknown in the nineteenth century.RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi Mitch,
Could you please clarify why EXACTLY Option C is considered wrong ?
Doesn't Option C mean that people in the 19th century weren't really old at the time of their death, rather they died young/early because of lack of medical technology that saves people in present times, making the the AVERAGE "Life expectancy" higher now.
It seems to be that Option C is pretty close!
Look forward to your thoughts.
Since the medical technology that allows people today to live to an advanced age was not available in the 19th century, the conclusion that few people in the 19th century lived beyond the age of 40 is possibly STRENGTHENED.
The correct answer choice must clearly WEAKEN the conclusion that few people in the 19th century lived beyond the age of 40.
Eliminate C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Hello,GMATGuruNY wrote:C: Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was unknown in the nineteenth century.RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi Mitch,
Could you please clarify why EXACTLY Option C is considered wrong ?
Doesn't Option C mean that people in the 19th century weren't really old at the time of their death, rather they died young/early because of lack of medical technology that saves people in present times, making the the AVERAGE "Life expectancy" higher now.
It seems to be that Option C is pretty close!
Look forward to your thoughts.
Since the medical technology that allows people today to live to an advanced age was not available in the 19th century, the conclusion that few people in the 19th century lived beyond the age of 40 is possibly STRENGTHENED.
The correct answer choice must clearly WEAKEN the conclusion that few people in the 19th century lived beyond the age of 40.
Eliminate C.
I like your explanation. But I am more confused with Option B "the last 150 years", does that necessarily mean the 19th century?
Thanks!
Kate
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The 21st century refers to the years 2001-2100.yxlucy321 wrote:Hello,GMATGuruNY wrote:C: Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was unknown in the nineteenth century.RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi Mitch,
Could you please clarify why EXACTLY Option C is considered wrong ?
Doesn't Option C mean that people in the 19th century weren't really old at the time of their death, rather they died young/early because of lack of medical technology that saves people in present times, making the the AVERAGE "Life expectancy" higher now.
It seems to be that Option C is pretty close!
Look forward to your thoughts.
Since the medical technology that allows people today to live to an advanced age was not available in the 19th century, the conclusion that few people in the 19th century lived beyond the age of 40 is possibly STRENGTHENED.
The correct answer choice must clearly WEAKEN the conclusion that few people in the 19th century lived beyond the age of 40.
Eliminate C.
I like your explanation. But I am more confused with Option B "the last 150 years", does that necessarily mean the 19th century?
Thanks!
Kate
The 20th century refers to the years 1901-2000.
The 19th century refers to the years 1801-1900.
Thus:
150 years ago = 2017 - (150 years) = 1867.
By extension:
the last 150 years = since 1867 = since the middle of the 19th century.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3