Tricky absolute question..... help needed

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members

Tricky absolute question..... help needed

by Mo2men » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:42 pm
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

(1) |x| > |y|
(2) |x-y| < |x|

Source:GC
OA: B

|x+y|>|x-y|...........Square both sides

x^2 + 2xy + y^2 > x^2 - 2xy + y^2

4xy > 0 .....the question could be repharsed

Is xy > 0 or Do both x & y have same sign?

1) |x| > |y|

Clearly Insufficient

2) |x-y| < |x| ..........Square both sides

x^2 - 2xy + y^2 < x^2

y^2 - 2 xy < 0 ...............Because we are certain that 'y' can't equal zero. I can divide by 'y'. If y =0 statement 2 would be |x| < |x| which is invalid. So you does not equal 0

y < 2x

here y and x can both have same sign or different sign.

Insufficient

Combine both statements 1 & 2

still insiffecent ..............Answer is E

Where did I go wrong in the above?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

Tricky absolute question..... help needed

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:57 pm
Mo2men wrote:Do both x & y have same sign?

2) |x-y| < |x| ..........Square both sides

x^2 - 2xy + y^2 < x^2

y^2 - 2 xy < 0 ...............Because we are certain that 'y' can't equal zero. I can divide by 'y'. If y =0 statement 2 would be |x| < |x| which is invalid. So you does not equal 0

y < 2x
The portion in red does not account for the sign of y.
You correctly squared the inequality to yield the following:
y² - 2xy < 0
y² < 2xy.

If y>0, then dividing both sides by y yields the following:
y < 2x.
Since y>0, we get:
0 < y < 2x, implying that both x and y are positive.

If y<0, then dividing both sides by y requires that we flip the inequality, yielding the following:
y > 2x.
Since y<0, we get:
2x < y < 0, implying that both x and y are negative.

In each case, x and y have the same sign.
Thus, the answer to the rephrased question stem is YES.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:42 pm
It might be easier to do this conceptually.

|x + y| > |x - y| can be stated as "x is further from -y than it is from y".

S2 can be stated as "x is further from 0 than it is from y".

If x is further from 0 than it is from y, x and y MUST be on the same side of zero, i.e. x and y must share the same sign. (If they had different signs, x to y would be (x to 0) + (0 to y), but with S2 that would make (x to 0) > (x to 0) + (0 to y), and (0 to y) can't be negative!)

With that in mind, the distance from x to -y = (the distance from x to 0) + (the distance from 0 to -y).

Since (x to 0) is already bigger than (x to y), we MUST have (x to 0) + (0 to -y) > (x to y), and S2 alone is sufficient.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:14 pm
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
A solution with an alternate line of reasoning for Statement 2:

Is |x+y| > |x-y|?
When there is absolute value notation on each side, we can square the inequality.

(x+y)² > (x-y)²
x² + 2xy + y² > x² - 2xy + y²
4xy > 0
xy > 0.

Question rephrased: Do x and y have the same sign?

Statement 1: |x| > |y|
Here, x and y could have the same sign or different signs.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: |x-y| < |x|
Squaring both sides, we get:
(x-y)² < x²
x² - 2xy + y² < x²
y² < 2xy
xy > y²/2.
Since the square of a value cannot be negative, y²/2 cannot be negative.
Thus, xy>0, implying that x and y have the same sign.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:05 am
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
We could also treat this as a DISTANCE/NUMBER LINE problem.
|x-y| = the distance between x and y.
|x+y| = the distance between x and -y.
|x| = the distance between x and 0.

Is |x-y| < |x+y|?
In words:
Is the distance between between x and y less than the distance between x and -y?
For x to be CLOSER TO Y than to -y, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
To illustrate:
x.....y..............0.............-y
.......y.....x.......0.............-y
As these examples show, when x and y are to the same side of 0, x is closer to y than to -y.

Question rephrased: Are x and y to the same side of 0?

Statement 1: |x| > |y|
x and y could be to the same side of 0 or on opposite sides of 0.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: |x-y| < |x|
In words:
The distance between x and y is less than the distance between x and 0.
This will not be true if x and y are on opposite sides of 0.
To illustrate:
x.........0...........y
y.........0..........x
In each case here, the distance between x and y is GREATER than the distance between x and 0.
Thus, to satisfy statement 2, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members

by Mo2men » Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:37 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
We could also treat this as a DISTANCE/NUMBER LINE problem.
|x-y| = the distance between x and y.
|x+y| = the distance between x and -y.
|x| = the distance between x and 0.

Is |x-y| < |x+y|?
In words:
Is the distance between between x and y less than the distance between x and -y?
For x to be CLOSER TO Y than to -y, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
To illustrate:
x.....y..............0.............-y
.......y.....x.......0.............-y
As these examples show, when x and y are to the same side of 0, x is closer to y than to -y.

Dear Mitch,

Thanks for your wonderful approaches you presented.

Should not the illustration be as follows:

x...-y..............0.............y
.....-y.....x.......0.............y

Thanks

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

Tricky absolute question..... help needed

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Sep 03, 2017 3:08 am
Mo2men wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
We could also treat this as a DISTANCE/NUMBER LINE problem.
|x-y| = the distance between x and y.
|x+y| = the distance between x and -y.
|x| = the distance between x and 0.

Is |x-y| < |x+y|?
In words:
Is the distance between between x and y less than the distance between x and -y?
For x to be CLOSER TO Y than to -y, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
To illustrate:
x.....y..............0.............-y
.......y.....x.......0.............-y

As these examples show, when x and y are to the same side of 0, x is closer to y than to -y.
Dear Mitch,

Thanks for your wonderful approaches you presented.

Should not the illustration be as follows:

x...-y..............0.............y
.....-y.....x.......0.............y


Thanks
In the blue illustration, x and y are both to the left of 0, implying that x and y are both negative.
Since y is negative, -y > 0, with the result that -y is to the right of 0.
The blue illustration positions x closer to y than to -y.
Since the distance between x and -y is greater than the distance between x and y, the following inequality is implied:
|x+y | > |x-y|.
Thus, the blue illustration accurately reflects the question stem.

In the red illustration, x and y are to different sides of 0, with the result that x is closer to -y and than to y.
Since the distance between x and -y is less than the distance between x and y, the following inequality is implied:
|x+y | < |x-y|.
Thus, the red illustration does not accurately reflect the question stem.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members

by Mo2men » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:59 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Mo2men wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
We could also treat this as a DISTANCE/NUMBER LINE problem.
|x-y| = the distance between x and y.
|x+y| = the distance between x and -y.
|x| = the distance between x and 0.

Is |x-y| < |x+y|?
In words:
Is the distance between between x and y less than the distance between x and -y?
For x to be CLOSER TO Y than to -y, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
To illustrate:
x.....y..............0.............-y
.......y.....x.......0.............-y

As these examples show, when x and y are to the same side of 0, x is closer to y than to -y.
Dear Mitch,

Thanks for your wonderful approaches you presented.

Should not the illustration be as follows:

x...-y..............0.............y
.....-y.....x.......0.............y


Thanks
In the blue illustration, x and y are both to the left of 0, implying that x and y are both negative.
Since y is negative, -y > 0, with the result that -y is to the right of 0.
The blue illustration positions x closer to y than to -y.
Since the distance between x and -y is greater than the distance between x and y, the following inequality is implied:
|x+y | > |x-y|.
Thus, the blue illustration accurately reflects the question stem.

In the red illustration, x and y are to different sides of 0, with the result that x is closer to -y and than to y.
Since the distance between x and -y is less than the distance between x and y, the following inequality is implied:
|x+y | < |x-y|.
Thus, the red illustration does not accurately reflect the question stem.
Thanks Mitch for your awesome explanation.