Error in OG Data Sufficiency Book - check my math

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:30 pm
I have issues with the following Data Sufficiency problem in
the OG 11 edition. I also have a question at the bottom.

Problem 132 (answer on page 331)

If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?

(1)n has exactly two positive factors.
(2)The difference of any two positive distinct factors of n is odd.

n can be any prime number.

(2)I say not sufficient. n could be 6 or 2.

The factors of 6 are 1, 2, and 3.

3-2 = 1; 2-1 = 1; both 3-2 and
2-1 are the difference of any two positive factors of n and both are odd
satisfying the requirements of (2); n could also be 2; the factors of
2 are 1 and 2; 2-1 = 1 which is odd

Thus, n could be 2 or 6; not
sufficient

Using both (1) and (2) it would leave the only number possible as 2 thus the answer is C

The OG says (2) is sufficient. I disagree for the
aforementioned reasons.

The answer in the book is subtracting n with the distinct factor. It states that if n is greater than 2 and n is odd, then 1 and n are factors of n,
and their difference is even. Also, if n
is greater than 2 and n is even, then 2 and n are factors, and the difference is even. Even using this logic, using 6 = n can still
result in satisfying (2) For example,
6-3 = 3; 3 is odd thus giving 6 and 2 as possible answers.

(2) asks for the difference of any two positive distinct factors though, not the difference between n and the factors. I believe the answer to this
problem in the OG is wrong.

Also, another question:

is zero an integer?

I say yes. I cannot remember the problem but it required an integer, and when zero was used, the answer I obtained was different than the answer in the OG. I am curious if the GMAT doesn’t consider zero to be an integer. I’m reviewing for the GMAT next Monday and if I can find the problem I will post it.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 6773
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 1249 times
Followed by:994 members

by beatthegmat » Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:35 am
With regard to your second question--whether zero is an integer--please see my GMAT Flashcards: I believe you can find the answer there.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/viewtopic.php?t=32
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team

Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses

Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:30 pm

by MaleInNC2007 » Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:24 pm
beatthegmat wrote:With regard to your second question--whether zero is an integer--please see my GMAT Flashcards: I believe you can find the answer there.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/viewtopic.php?t=32
Thanks!

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:31 pm
MaleInNC2007 wrote: The factors of 6 are 1, 2, and 3.
The Factors of 6 are actually 1, 2, 3 and 6.

Notice that the statement does not imply only prime factors - all factors are valid. Therefore if you take any two factors you could come up with 6 - 2 which of course is a positive and therefore does not qualify for statement #2.

The answer in the OG is correct.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 11:53 am

OG 131 maths

by coachy » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:06 pm
You are right. I was confused about this question. And it suddenly dawned on me that I have to consider the statement 2 as true and evaluate if n can be 2. I was trying to prove the statement 2 as wrong but I guess that is what DS practice is about. I have to keep on reminding myself that the statement 1 and 2 are universal truths.
gogmat

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:27 am

by Tame the CAT » Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:37 pm
3-1 is even. So it cannot be 6.