Is \(x\) a multiple of \(72?\)

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 6:10 am
Followed by:3 members

Is \(x\) a multiple of \(72?\)

by VJesus12 » Thu May 13, 2021 6:39 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Is \(x\) a multiple of \(72?\)

(1) \(x\) is a multiple of \(16.\)
(2) \(x\) is divisible by \(18.\)

Answer: C

Source: Manhattan GMAT

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

Re: Is \(x\) a multiple of \(72?\)

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue May 18, 2021 9:59 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

VJesus12 wrote:
Thu May 13, 2021 6:39 am
Is \(x\) a multiple of \(72?\)

(1) \(x\) is a multiple of \(16.\)
(2) \(x\) is divisible by \(18.\)

Answer: C

Source: Manhattan GMAT
-----ASIDE---------------------
A lot of integer property questions can be solved using prime factorization.
For questions involving divisibility, divisors, factors and multiples, we can say:
If N is a multiple of k, then k is "hiding" within the prime factorization of N

Consider these examples:
24 is a multiple of 3 because 24 = (2)(2)(2)(3)
Likewise, 70 is a multiple of 5 because 70 = (2)(5)(7)
And 112 is a multiple of 8 because 112 = (2)(2)(2)(2)(7)
And 630 is a multiple of 15 because 630 = (2)(3)(3)(5)(7)
-----ONTO THE QUESTION!---------------------

Target question: Is x a multiple of 72?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.

72 = (2)(2)(2)(3)(3)
REPHRASED target question: Are three 2's and two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x?

Aside: the video below has tips on rephrasing the target question

Statement 1: x is a multiple of 16
16 = (2)(2)(2)(2)
So, this tells us that there are four 2's hiding in the prime factorization of x.
However, we can't be sure whether there are also two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x.
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x is divisible by 18
18 = (2)(3)(3)
So, this tells us that there is one 2 and two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x.
This means we have enough 3's, however we can't be sure whether there are also three 2's hiding in the prime factorization of x
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT


Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that there are three 2's hiding in the prime factorization of x
Statement 2 tells us that there are two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x
So when we COMBINE statements, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, there are three 2's and two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image