Some scientists contend that many species of dinosaur had a metabolism more like a warm-blooded mammal's than a cold-blooded reptile's.
A. that many species of dinosaur had a metabolism more like
B. that the metabolism of many dinosaur species were more like
C. that the metabolisms of many species of dinosaurs were more like those of
D. there were many species of dinosaurs that had metabolisms more like those of
E. there were many dinosaur species that had a metabolism more like that of
[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
I would request to explain every option. Why are the wrong options wrong?
Thanks.
Tricky one!
This topic has expert replies
- gmat_perfect
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:14 members
gmat_perfect wrote:Some scientists contend that many species of dinosaur had a metabolism more like a warm-blooded mammal's than a cold-blooded reptile's.
A. that many species of dinosaur had a metabolism more like
B. that the metabolism of many dinosaur species were more like
C. that the metabolisms of many species of dinosaurs were more like those of
D. there were many species of dinosaurs that had metabolisms more like those of
E. there were many dinosaur species that had a metabolism more like that of
[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
I would request to explain every option. Why are the wrong options wrong?
Thanks.
those of = redundant --> C and D are out
that of = redundant --> E is out
metabolism were --> SV-agreement B is out
Thus the answer is a. Where is the trick?
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:32 am
- Thanked: 16 times
"that" is required after contend. ---> D and E are outgmat_perfect wrote:Some scientists contend that many species of dinosaur had a metabolism more like a warm-blooded mammal's than a cold-blooded reptile's.
A. that many species of dinosaur had a metabolism more like
B. that the metabolism of many dinosaur species were more like
C. that the metabolisms of many species of dinosaurs were more like those of
D. there were many species of dinosaurs that had metabolisms more like those of
E. there were many dinosaur species that had a metabolism more like that of
[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
I would request to explain every option. Why are the wrong options wrong?
Thanks.
also "those of" ,"that of" unncessary and creating confusiong. (C is out)
metabolisms of.X were more like "metabolisms of" <those of> Y's than Z's
metabolisms of.X were more like "metabolisms of" <those of> Y than Z --> then it "may be" correct gramatically unless other errors are there.
metabolism ... were --> wrong in B.
A is the best.
- gmat_perfect
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:14 members
The trick was in the use of that of x's.
That of ---possessive.
X's ==possessive.
So the use of "that of X's" is wrong for double possessive.
Mojar kotha holo:
Every one has caught the trick.
You are doing well men.
Thanks.
That of ---possessive.
X's ==possessive.
So the use of "that of X's" is wrong for double possessive.
Mojar kotha holo:
Every one has caught the trick.
You are doing well men.
Thanks.
- Gurpinder
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:3 members
It is singular.reply2spg wrote:Is metabolism is singular or plural?
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- Gurpinder
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:3 members
I would narrow it down to A/E.
A. that many species of dinosaur had a metabolism more like
E. there were many dinosaur species that had a metabolism more like that of
Other than that/there distinction, why is E wrong. Whats wrong with that of?
A. that many species of dinosaur had a metabolism more like
E. there were many dinosaur species that had a metabolism more like that of
Other than that/there distinction, why is E wrong. Whats wrong with that of?
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
that of = metabolism .. right ... but then we have the possessives which makes the "that of" redundant
So it could have been " that of a warm blooded animal ........ reptile"
but then you cannot change it from animal's to animal because it is in the non under-lined part
So it could have been " that of a warm blooded animal ........ reptile"
but then you cannot change it from animal's to animal because it is in the non under-lined part
@Deb
IMO A
There is an appostrophe after mammal's. So we can say that " many species of dinosaur had a metabolism of warm-blooded mammal vs metabolism of cold-blooded reptile....". So I got rid of C, D, and E. B has faulty subject-verb agreement issue.
There is an appostrophe after mammal's. So we can say that " many species of dinosaur had a metabolism of warm-blooded mammal vs metabolism of cold-blooded reptile....". So I got rid of C, D, and E. B has faulty subject-verb agreement issue.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:48 am
I agree A is best. But I have a problem
in A, there is no "of " phrase at the begining, why can we use "'s " at the end.
I think that only if there is "of " phrase at the bigining, we can use "'s " at the end
for example:
the hat of my friend is like my sister's
please, explain. where is this question from? I think it is not from good source.
in A, there is no "of " phrase at the begining, why can we use "'s " at the end.
I think that only if there is "of " phrase at the bigining, we can use "'s " at the end
for example:
the hat of my friend is like my sister's
please, explain. where is this question from? I think it is not from good source.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Let's be as definitive as we can:
B has bad subject-verb agreement ("the metabolism [...] were")
C and D imply that a singular mammal has multiple metabolisms ("those of")
E (i) doesn't have a parallel comparison ("that of a warm-blooded mammal's" and simply "a cold-blooded reptile's") and (ii) has the arguably redundant "that of a warm-blooded mammal's".
B has bad subject-verb agreement ("the metabolism [...] were")
C and D imply that a singular mammal has multiple metabolisms ("those of")
E (i) doesn't have a parallel comparison ("that of a warm-blooded mammal's" and simply "a cold-blooded reptile's") and (ii) has the arguably redundant "that of a warm-blooded mammal's".
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
That example sentence isn't right: we'd say something like "My friend's hat is like my sister's".vietmoi999 wrote:I agree A is best. But I have a problem
in A, there is no "of " phrase at the begining, why can we use "'s " at the end.
I think that only if there is "of " phrase at the bigining, we can use "'s " at the end
for example:
the hat of my friend is like my sister's
please, explain. where is this question from? I think it is not from good source.
For an excellent discussion of double possessives, I'll link you to Grammar Girl and give you the summary here:
1:: When describing something that belongs to a human or (sometimes) an animal, you can use a single or a double possessive depending on how you structure the sentence. If you use the possessor before the thing possessed ("Tom's bike") you use a single possessive; if you don't ("a bike of Tom's"), you use a double possessive.
FINE: "He's Jimmy's friend." (single possessive)
ALSO FINE: "He's a friend of Jimmy's." (double possessive)
NOT FINE: "He's a friend of Jimmy." (single possessive, but unidiomatic)
FINE: "This is a problem of mine." (I'm a person)
NOT FINE: "This is a problem of its." (Whatever "it" is, it isn't a person)
2:: When describing something inanimate (something that isn't alive), you CAN'T use a double possessive.
FINE: "He's a friend of the museum." (single possessive)
NOT FINE: "He's a friend of the museum's." (double possessive)
ALSO NOT FINE: "He's the museum's friend." (single possessive, but unidiomatic)
The source cited for this is Fowler, so these rules are reasonably reliable, but the GMAC does buck traditional authorities from time to time.
- nighthawks
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:39 am
I think the easiest way to do this question is
First, Spot "a warm-blooded mammal's than a cold-blooded reptile's. "
this means the sentence is talking about somethings that belong to those two.
So there is no point to use "those of or that of" (It's not redundant, but it creates wrong comparison)
C D E out
Then, B is S-V agreement error, which is easy to spot. So the correct answer is A.
First, Spot "a warm-blooded mammal's than a cold-blooded reptile's. "
this means the sentence is talking about somethings that belong to those two.
So there is no point to use "those of or that of" (It's not redundant, but it creates wrong comparison)
C D E out
Then, B is S-V agreement error, which is easy to spot. So the correct answer is A.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:48 pm
This really is a tricky one, when the question isn't a real question. A is the correct answer. Metabolisms should not be use in this.