Hey Guys,
I have got three algebra related Problems. 2 Data sufficiency and one problem solving. I hope you guys can help me!
1. Find the solution set for the following inequality |3x - 2| ≤ |2x - 5|?
2. If s-1/s<1/t-t is s < t?
s > 1
t > 0
3. Is x/12>y/40 ?
10x < 3y -6
12x - 7 > 4y
Three Alegbra Problems
- garuhape
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:37 pm
- Location: Munich
- Thanked: 3 times
Can you please explain how you get the 7/5... I only get the -3!HSPA wrote:For the 1st problem I am getting definite values of -3 and 7/5... havent got a solution set
Havent understood the second one
third one (A)
- HSPA
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
- Thanked: 47 times
- Followed by:13 members
- GMAT Score:640
1) 3x-2 <= 2x-5 b) 2-3x <= 2x-5 c) 3x-2 <=5-2x d) 2-3x <= 5-2x
I solved these 4 equations.....
3) 10x < 3y -6
multiply with 1/10
x < 3y/10 - (+ve)
multiply with 1/12 on both sides
x/12 < y/40 - (+ve)
SO conclusion is Y/40 is greater than X/12 by some +ve value..... So A is sufficient
B) Now multiply with 1/144 on both sides
x/12 - (+ve) > y/36 ....How to make Y/36 as Y/40 ... I havent got this So I kept B insufficent
I solved these 4 equations.....
3) 10x < 3y -6
multiply with 1/10
x < 3y/10 - (+ve)
multiply with 1/12 on both sides
x/12 < y/40 - (+ve)
SO conclusion is Y/40 is greater than X/12 by some +ve value..... So A is sufficient
B) Now multiply with 1/144 on both sides
x/12 - (+ve) > y/36 ....How to make Y/36 as Y/40 ... I havent got this So I kept B insufficent
- VivianKerr
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 474 times
- Followed by:365 members
For QUESTION ONE: Is that a < or a > between the absolute values? Regardless, you'll need to split it into FOUR inequalities:
Just like
| 3x - 2 | > 10
would become
3x - 2 > 10
AND
3x - 2 < -10
If you double the absolute values, you're going to have four inequalities instead of two.
For QUESTION TWO:
s - 1 / s < 1 / t - t
Is this correct? t - t = 0, which will be undefined since it's in the denominator. Just want to make sure there's no error here in the way you've copied it....
For QUESTION THREE:
x /12 > y / 40? Yes/no DS.
To determine sufficiency, we need to know the value of x AND the value of y.
(1) Gives us the range for the relationship between x and y.
Let's say x = 3, then the inequality would become 30 < 3y - 6, or 12 < y. Since y can be anything as long as it is greater than 12, we could say y = 20. That would make our inequality 3/12 > 20/40, or 1/4 > 1/2 which is FALSE.
Let's say x = -3, then the inequality would become -30 < 3y - 6, or -24 < 3y, or -8 < y. Again, no matter what we choose, it will make our original inequality FALSE.
Let's say x = 0, then the inequality would becomes 0 < 3y - 6, or 6 < 3y, or 2 < y. Let's say y = 40. Then we'd get 0/12 > 40/40 for our original inequality. That becomes 0 > 1, another FALSE statement.
We can see that (1) is sufficient, since when we choose very different sets of numbers, we answer our original question in the same way.
(2) Gives another range for the relationship between x and y. Let's try some numbers again to test the results.
If x = 0, the inequality becomes 12(0) - 7 > 4y, then 0 - 7 > 4y, then -7/4 > y. Let's say y = -2. Plugging those back in to the original inequality: 0 > -1/20. This is a TRUE statement.
If x = -1, the inequality becomes 12(-1) - 7 > 4y, then -12 - 7 > 4y, then -19 > 4y, then -19/4 > y. Let's say y = -5. The original inequality becomes -1/12 > -5/40, or -1/12 > -1/8. This is another TRUE statement.
If x = 1/2, then 12(1/2) - 7 > 4y, then 6 - 7 > 4y, then -1/4 > y. Let's say y = -1/2. Plugging that into the original inequality: (1/2)/12 > (-1/2)/40, becomes 1/2 x 1/12 > -1/2 x 1/40, becomes 1/24 > -1/80. Again, a TRUE statement.
IMO, the answer is [spoiler](C)[/spoiler].
Just like
| 3x - 2 | > 10
would become
3x - 2 > 10
AND
3x - 2 < -10
If you double the absolute values, you're going to have four inequalities instead of two.
For QUESTION TWO:
s - 1 / s < 1 / t - t
Is this correct? t - t = 0, which will be undefined since it's in the denominator. Just want to make sure there's no error here in the way you've copied it....
For QUESTION THREE:
x /12 > y / 40? Yes/no DS.
To determine sufficiency, we need to know the value of x AND the value of y.
(1) Gives us the range for the relationship between x and y.
Let's say x = 3, then the inequality would become 30 < 3y - 6, or 12 < y. Since y can be anything as long as it is greater than 12, we could say y = 20. That would make our inequality 3/12 > 20/40, or 1/4 > 1/2 which is FALSE.
Let's say x = -3, then the inequality would become -30 < 3y - 6, or -24 < 3y, or -8 < y. Again, no matter what we choose, it will make our original inequality FALSE.
Let's say x = 0, then the inequality would becomes 0 < 3y - 6, or 6 < 3y, or 2 < y. Let's say y = 40. Then we'd get 0/12 > 40/40 for our original inequality. That becomes 0 > 1, another FALSE statement.
We can see that (1) is sufficient, since when we choose very different sets of numbers, we answer our original question in the same way.
(2) Gives another range for the relationship between x and y. Let's try some numbers again to test the results.
If x = 0, the inequality becomes 12(0) - 7 > 4y, then 0 - 7 > 4y, then -7/4 > y. Let's say y = -2. Plugging those back in to the original inequality: 0 > -1/20. This is a TRUE statement.
If x = -1, the inequality becomes 12(-1) - 7 > 4y, then -12 - 7 > 4y, then -19 > 4y, then -19/4 > y. Let's say y = -5. The original inequality becomes -1/12 > -5/40, or -1/12 > -1/8. This is another TRUE statement.
If x = 1/2, then 12(1/2) - 7 > 4y, then 6 - 7 > 4y, then -1/4 > y. Let's say y = -1/2. Plugging that into the original inequality: (1/2)/12 > (-1/2)/40, becomes 1/2 x 1/12 > -1/2 x 1/40, becomes 1/24 > -1/80. Again, a TRUE statement.
IMO, the answer is [spoiler](C)[/spoiler].
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
two approaches to tackle this problem - solution areas { nightmare here, with six areas --> (3x-2)>0, (3x-2)<0, (3x-2)=0, (2x-5)>0, (2x-5)<0, (2x-5)=0 } OR squaring both sides. I chose the second -less dreary way
|3x - 2| ≤ |2x - 5|
(3x-2)^2 ≤ (2x-5)^2
9x^2 -12x +4 ≤ 4x^2 -20x +25
5x^2 +8x -21 ≤ 0,
...
5x^2+8x-21=0, |Discriminant=Sqrt(64+20*21)=22, x(1,2)=(-8+-22)/10= {-3; 1.4}
(x+3)(x-1.4) ≤ 0, x ≤ -3 and x ≤ 1.5. The solution set for x is (-3; 1.4).
|3x - 2| ≤ |2x - 5|
(3x-2)^2 ≤ (2x-5)^2
9x^2 -12x +4 ≤ 4x^2 -20x +25
5x^2 +8x -21 ≤ 0,
...
5x^2+8x-21=0, |Discriminant=Sqrt(64+20*21)=22, x(1,2)=(-8+-22)/10= {-3; 1.4}
(x+3)(x-1.4) ≤ 0, x ≤ -3 and x ≤ 1.5. The solution set for x is (-3; 1.4).
garuhape wrote: 1. Find the solution set for the following inequality |3x - 2| ≤ |2x - 5|?
Last edited by Night reader on Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:15 pm, edited 3 times in total.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
- Thanked: 85 times
- Followed by:3 members
hi night reader
are you dead sure in your solution? if i got your answer right it is x<-43
if x=-50 then
|3(-50)-2|=|-152|=152
|2(-50)-2|=|-102|=102, but 152>102
and if x=0
then
|-2|=2
|-5|=5. 2<5
are you dead sure in your solution? if i got your answer right it is x<-43
if x=-50 then
|3(-50)-2|=|-152|=152
|2(-50)-2|=|-102|=102, but 152>102
and if x=0
then
|-2|=2
|-5|=5. 2<5
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
please check solution above
clock60 wrote:hi night reader
are you dead sure in your solution? if i got your answer right it is x<-43
if x=-50 then
|3(-50)-2|=|-152|=152
|2(-50)-2|=|-102|=102, but 152>102
and if x=0
then
|-2|=2
|-5|=5. 2<5
Last edited by Night reader on Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
for the second I got B
given: s-1/s<1/t-t, Is s < t?
st(1) s>1, s-1/s>0. Since 1/t-t>s-1/s, 1/t-t>0 and t<1 -hence Sufficient to answer No, s>t
st(2) t>0, It can be 1/t-t>0 or 1/t-t<0. If 1/t-t>0 then 0<t<1 then it must be s>1 -So s>t. And when 1/t-t<0 then t>1 and s<1 -So t>s Insufficient, as two cases are possible s>t and s<t
IOM B
given: s-1/s<1/t-t, Is s < t?
st(1) s>1, s-1/s>0. Since 1/t-t>s-1/s, 1/t-t>0 and t<1 -hence Sufficient to answer No, s>t
st(2) t>0, It can be 1/t-t>0 or 1/t-t<0. If 1/t-t>0 then 0<t<1 then it must be s>1 -So s>t. And when 1/t-t<0 then t>1 and s<1 -So t>s Insufficient, as two cases are possible s>t and s<t
IOM B
garuhape wrote: 2. If s-1/s<1/t-t is s < t?
s > 1
t > 0
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
please check solution above
clock60 wrote:ok your final solution x<-4.2
x=-5
|-15-2|=|-17|=17
|-10-5|=|-15|=15. but again 17>15, but left part must be less than right part, according to the inequality
|3x - 2| < |2x - 5|
Last edited by Night reader on Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
- Thanked: 85 times
- Followed by:3 members
i also think that working with solution areas works better here.
squaring better works with equations
but honestly i don`t think we must bother about this problem, i never saw similar problems in og or gprep
with given answers it is easier to find right one
what about 3 problem it seems pretty more gmat stylish
squaring better works with equations
but honestly i don`t think we must bother about this problem, i never saw similar problems in og or gprep
with given answers it is easier to find right one
what about 3 problem it seems pretty more gmat stylish
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
please do not look after 6 areas/intervals above - square both sides
clock60 wrote:i also think that working with solution areas works better here.
squaring better works with equations
but honestly i don`t think we must bother about this problem, i never saw similar problems in og or gprep
with given answers it is easier to find right one
what about 3 problem it seems pretty more gmat stylish
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
- Thanked: 85 times
- Followed by:3 members
@ night reader
may be it is better to put aside this
it closer to the truth, but probably you commit math mistake, you answer -3<x<1.5. as i see
try x=1.45
3*1.45-2=2,35
|2*1.45-5|=|-2.1|=2.1
2.35>2,1 not true
may be it is better to put aside this
it closer to the truth, but probably you commit math mistake, you answer -3<x<1.5. as i see
try x=1.45
3*1.45-2=2,35
|2*1.45-5|=|-2.1|=2.1
2.35>2,1 not true