The Life and Casualty Company hopes that by increasing its environmental fund revenues to $1.2 billion, that it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and no longer has to use its profits and capital to pay those claims bit by bit, year by year.
A) that it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and no longer has
B) enough has been set aside with which environmental claims can be paid and it will have no longer
C) it has set aside enough for payment of environmental claims and thus no longer having
D) enough has been set aside to pay for environmental claims, thus no longer having
E) it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and will no longer have
OA: E
What's wrong with options B and D? Can any experts help?
Solve 700-Level Algebra Qs In 90 Secs!
Master 700-level Inequalities and Absolute Value Questions
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
The Life and Casualty Company hopes that by increasing its e
This topic has expert replies
-
BTGmoderatorAT
- Moderator
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:48 pm
- Followed by:1 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Ali Tariq
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:11 am
- Location: Lahore, Pakistan
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:204 members
by increasing its environmental fund revenues to $1.2 billion, is an initial modifier that contains by ving and pronoun its.ardz24 wrote:The Life and Casualty Company hopes that by increasing its environmental fund revenues to $1.2 billion, that it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and no longer has to use its profits and capital to pay those claims bit by bit, year by year.
A) that it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and no longer has
B) enough has been set aside with which environmental claims can be paid and it will have no longer
C) it has set aside enough for payment of environmental claims and thus no longer having
D) enough has been set aside to pay for environmental claims, thus no longer having
E) it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and will no longer have
OA: E
What's wrong with options B and D? Can any experts help?
Thus, by ving(increasing) and its refer to the subject of the clause.
it, which refers to The Life and Casualty Comapany, is an appropriate subject whereas enough (money) is not.
Further, passive construction in B and D is also problematic as it changes the meaning .
B and D) enough has been set aside [by whom? (no mentions )]
E) It has set aside enough [ who?( The Life and Casualty Comapany)]
Thus, the two are not same.
