the food and beverage entrepreneur

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:25 am

the food and beverage entrepreneur

by sksk » Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:49 am
Toward the end of that year, the food and beverage entrepreneur was looking for a partner - someone not only who could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but sharing his passion as well to launch a new product on the market.

A) someone not only who could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but sharing his passion as well to launch
B) someone who not only could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but also shared his passion to launch
C) someone who not only could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but also share his passion to launch
D) that being someone who not only could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but sharing his passion for launching
E) being someone who not only could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but share his passion as well, launching

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:15 am
In every answer choice, it is not immediately clear whether his passion serves to refer to the entrepreneur or to the partner.
I would ignore this SC.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:36 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:660

by akjgmat » Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:32 am
Mitch
Considering "HIS" is causing irrelevance,would replacing HIS with "A" make better sense?

Toward the end of that year, the food and beverage entrepreneur was looking for a partner - someone not only who could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but sharing A passion as well to launch a new product on the market.

A) someone not only who could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but sharing a passion as well to launch
B) someone who not only could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but also shared a passion to launch
C) someone who not only could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but also share a passion to launch
D) that being someone who not only could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but sharing a passion for launching
E) being someone who not only could provide expertise in developing talent pipelines, but share a passion as well, launching

Now, would the answer be "C"?

A- Not only is incorrectly used
B- "share" verb is not parallel
D/E - not only - but also (not-idiomatic)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jan 15, 2016 5:01 am
akjgmat wrote:Would the answer be "C"?

A- Not only is incorrectly used
B- "share" verb is not parallel
D/E - not only - but also (not-idiomatic)
Your reasons for eliminating A, B, D and E are valid.
The OA is C, but this option lacks parallelism.

MODAL VERBS include can, could, would, should, etc.
The BARE INFINITIVE is to + VERB with the to omitted.
A common verb structure is MODAL VERB + BARE INFINITIVE:
John could win the game.
Here, could is a modal verb, while win is the bare infinitive of to win.

Rule:
not only X but also Y must serve to connect PARALLEL FORMS.

C: someone who not only COULD provide but also SHARE
Here, could (modal verb) and share (the bare infinitive of to share) are not parallel forms.
Eliminate C.

The SC above does not have a viable answer choice.

C, corrected: someone who could not only PROVIDE but also SHARE
Here, provide (the bare infinitive form of to provide) and share (the bare infinitive form of to share) are parallel forms.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:36 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:660

by akjgmat » Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:10 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
akjgmat wrote:Would the answer be "C"?

A- Not only is incorrectly used
B- "share" verb is not parallel
D/E - not only - but also (not-idiomatic)
Your reasons for eliminating A, B, D and E are valid.
The OA is C, but this option lacks parallelism.

MODAL VERBS include can, could, would, should, etc.
The BARE INFINITIVE is to + VERB with the to omitted.
A common verb structure is MODAL VERB + BARE INFINITIVE:
John could win the game.
Here, could is a modal verb, while win is the bare infinitive of to win.

Rule:
not only X but also Y must serve to connect PARALLEL FORMS.
Excellent, thank you very much for the precise explanation Mitch.

Rule noted :wink:

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 2:52 pm
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by aflaam » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:45 pm
sksk,
can you tell the source of this SC, so that we be skeptical about it from now onwards
Thx