Dunbar argues that gossip is important in human societies in the maintenance of social cohesion, just as social grooming does for other primates.
A. gossip is important in human societies in the maintenance of social cohesion, just as social grooming does for other primates
B. gossip is important in the maintenance of social cohesion in human society, just as social grooming does for other primates
C. in human societies gossip is important in social cohesion like social grooming for other primate societies
D. similar to social grooming in primates, human gossip is important in maintaining social cohesion
E. gossip is important in human societies in the maintenance of social cohesion, just as social grooming is in other primate groups
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Dunbar argues that gossip is important in human
This topic has expert replies
-
BTGmoderatorDC
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
-
deloitte247
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Option A: Wrong
This is just a mere repetition of the supposed question asked. It lacks the substance needed to qualify for the threshold placed for valid replies.
Option B: Wrong
Here, a clear case of not prioritizing language cohesion (to borrow from the main statement) which is needed to maintain an ambiance of peace between the major keywords in the article. Here, the word society ought to be in its plural form.
Option C: Wrong
*like* means citing an example of something, making know of the existence of some other things in a likely field interest. However, the placing of some words like ''in'' which is a preposition is wrongly placed which seeks to be particularly interested in the writer's opinion.
Option D: Wrong
This is somehow correct but some keywords are not included here. It is full of mere word replacements which is not a 'cohesive' choice of language formation.
Option E: Right
This is very appropriately put because all the organs of the original statement are present yet, the response has logic and devoid of plagiarism.
This is just a mere repetition of the supposed question asked. It lacks the substance needed to qualify for the threshold placed for valid replies.
Option B: Wrong
Here, a clear case of not prioritizing language cohesion (to borrow from the main statement) which is needed to maintain an ambiance of peace between the major keywords in the article. Here, the word society ought to be in its plural form.
Option C: Wrong
*like* means citing an example of something, making know of the existence of some other things in a likely field interest. However, the placing of some words like ''in'' which is a preposition is wrongly placed which seeks to be particularly interested in the writer's opinion.
Option D: Wrong
This is somehow correct but some keywords are not included here. It is full of mere word replacements which is not a 'cohesive' choice of language formation.
Option E: Right
This is very appropriately put because all the organs of the original statement are present yet, the response has logic and devoid of plagiarism.
