The book states: Comparisons are a form of parallelism that deserves special attention.
Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't it be: Comparisons are a form of parallelism that deserve special attention.
Maybe I'm getting the subject (comparisons) wrong?
Please help!
Subject-verb agreement error in MGMAT book?
This topic has expert replies
- MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
You nailed it, and actually even your version is not correct. This is correct.uniyal01 wrote:The book states: Comparisons are a form of parallelism that deserves special attention.
Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't it be: Comparisons are a form of parallelism that deserve special attention.
Maybe I'm getting the subject (comparisons) wrong?
Please help!
Comparisons are forms of parallelism that deserve special attention.
I could see that someone might want to consider Comparisons a topic, and in that case, maybe this construction would make sense.
Comparisons is a topic within Parallelism that deserves special attention.
I am not in love with that sentence, but anyway you get the idea.
Here's another alternative.
Comparisons make up a subset of parallelism that deserves special attention.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Cheers!Marty Murray wrote:You nailed it, and actually even your version is not correct. This is correct.uniyal01 wrote:The book states: Comparisons are a form of parallelism that deserves special attention.
Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't it be: Comparisons are a form of parallelism that deserve special attention.
Maybe I'm getting the subject (comparisons) wrong?
Please help!
Comparisons are forms of parallelism that deserve special attention.
I could see that someone might want to consider Comparisons a topic, and in that case, maybe this construction would make sense.
Comparisons is a topic within Parallelism that deserves special attention.
I am not in love with that sentence, but anyway you get the idea.
Here's another alternative.
Comparisons make up a subset of parallelism that deserves special attention.
Also, am I right to assume that 'which' and 'that' can be used interchangeably in the same sentence- Comparisons is a topic within Parallelism that deserves special attention.
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
"That" and "which" have different uses in American English. "Which" is considered a non-restrictive modifier, so when it comes immediately after a noun, it should follow a comma. For example, I can write "The birch tree, which I planted in the front yard two years ago, is now six feet tall." (The relative clause, "which I planted in the front yard," is additional information that is not crucial to the meaning of the sentence.)uniyal01 wrote:Cheers!Marty Murray wrote:You nailed it, and actually even your version is not correct. This is correct.uniyal01 wrote:The book states: Comparisons are a form of parallelism that deserves special attention.
Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't it be: Comparisons are a form of parallelism that deserve special attention.
Maybe I'm getting the subject (comparisons) wrong?
Please help!
Comparisons are forms of parallelism that deserve special attention.
I could see that someone might want to consider Comparisons a topic, and in that case, maybe this construction would make sense.
Comparisons is a topic within Parallelism that deserves special attention.
I am not in love with that sentence, but anyway you get the idea.
Here's another alternative.
Comparisons make up a subset of parallelism that deserves special attention.
Also, am I right to assume that 'which' and 'that' can be used interchangeably in the same sentence- Comparisons is a topic within Parallelism that deserves special attention.
If I use 'that' I would not insert a comma, because 'that' is a restrictive modifier. So I could also write, "The birch tree that I planted in the front yard two years ago is now six feet tall." (The relative clause "that I planted in the front yard" is now important information about the tree.)
The two sentences are both correct, but mean different things - in the first, I'm saying I only have one birch tree, and this tree happens to be in my front yard. In the second case, I'm suggesting that I have multiple birch trees, but I'm only writing about the one in my front yard. As far as the GMAT is concerned, we just need to know that 'which' follows a comma in this case, and 'that' does not.