Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increase in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduces the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restiction would allow the other species to recover.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
a) Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in respose to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
b) It has been many years since the restriction lead to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
c) The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
d) As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
e) In the snow goose's winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.
OA: B
Snow Geese
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pm
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:3 members
B sounds correct
Reason is that B tells us that hunters can kill so much and given the current rate of killing the 5% max kill are not reached by the close of the season. So dropping the upper limit on max kill won't help.
Reason is that B tells us that hunters can kill so much and given the current rate of killing the 5% max kill are not reached by the close of the season. So dropping the upper limit on max kill won't help.