A person buys a share for $ 50 and sells it for $ 52 after a year. What is the total profit made by him from the share?
(I) A company pays annual dividend
(II) The rate of dividend is 25%
(A) Statement (I) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (II) alone is not sufficient
(B) Statement (II) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (I) is not sufficient
(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement alone is sufficient
(D) Each statement ALONE is sufficient
(E) Statements (I) and (II) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient
What is the OA? I chose E
Shares - Dividend
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:37 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 34 times
- Followed by:5 members
sankruth, I will go for C. Because, in simple words, to calculate profit we have to know what is the price of the share after adding dividend. Stmt-1 is saying the dividend is annually and stmt-2 is saying the rate. So from both these two, we can calculate what price the share will be after adding the dividend. So we can calculate the profit then (if any)...
Correct me If I am wrong
Regards,
Amitava
Regards,
Amitava
- simplyjat
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:29 am
- Location: Hyderabad, India
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:770
When you are holding shares of some company, you generally get dividend once a year. As the question is mentioning 1 year as the holding period, you need to know what dividend was paid by the company.
Hence the answer C
Hence the answer C
simplyjat
It would be 25% of $50.
But couldn't you argue that since (2) tells you the rate of dividend, you can infer that the dividend is paid? You wouldn't need (1) and the answer would be B?
Or can a dividend exist without being paid?
But couldn't you argue that since (2) tells you the rate of dividend, you can infer that the dividend is paid? You wouldn't need (1) and the answer would be B?
Or can a dividend exist without being paid?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:37 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 34 times
- Followed by:5 members
Molsen, don't take it in other sense but are u not going too far? I mean to say - Is ur argument not going far from what has been mentioned in the Qs?molsen wrote:It would be 25% of $50.
But couldn't you argue that since (2) tells you the rate of dividend, you can infer that the dividend is paid? You wouldn't need (1) and the answer would be B?
Or can a dividend exist without being paid?
sankruth, to me, again I will say - the answer should be C. But u r now trying to pick every nook and corners [to me, it's not valid] of the qs!
Correct me If I am wrong
Regards,
Amitava
Regards,
Amitava
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:37 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 34 times
- Followed by:5 members
Guys, I think this is the time when we can ask for Stuart's approach or explanation. Stuart request to u - can u pls confirm the answer of this Qs?
Correct me If I am wrong
Regards,
Amitava
Regards,
Amitava
- gabriel
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:07 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 51 times
- Followed by:1 members
Well, dividend is paid on the face value of the stock but nowhere does it say in the question that 50$ is the face value, so I am going to say E.
PS: - Guys please attach the source of the question.
PS: - Guys please attach the source of the question.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:33 am
- Thanked: 10 times
This question is from a doc in BTG with about 100+ difficult quant questions.gabriel wrote:Well, dividend is paid on the face value of the stock but nowhere does it say in the question that 50$ is the face value, so I am going to say E.
PS: - Guys please attach the source of the question.