Thanks brother (or sister). Hope it helps!

Agreed that it depends a bit on the question....and agreed that each person needs to find what works for them.....but in general on PS questions I often see people writing things down before they have finished reading the question and that type of approach almost never works for the aforementioned r...

MGMAT has the OG Companion, which I would recommend. They don't have one for the OG 2015, but they do have one for the 13th ed (questions numbers are the same so you can use it for the OG 2015 or 13th ed) and you can probably pick up a used one very cheap. They also have the Navigator, which include...

Its not online, but my favorite resource for CR in general (and it does break down assumption and strengthen questions separately) is the LSAT Superprep book. There is an introductory section where the writers (LSAT writers) break down that question type (it is the LSAT's version of CR) and it is a ...

I would agree that a lot of what GMAC does seems to be a kind of shameless pursuit of profit - the exam probably doesn't need to be as expensive as it is and surely they could provide the diagnostic service for free (heck, it probably facilitates retakes, so they can make their money back there). An...

I would also add that it is much harder for companies to write verbal questions that properly mirror the logic and nuances of the real questions than it is to write Quant questions that do so. So while using 3rd party tests is often necessary, the Quant will tend to be more accurate than the Verbal....