Search found 38 matches


I feel that 'speed limit' needs to be the subject of this sentence.

So only B and C can be correct according to me.

B has parallelism in 'Ineffective' 'Meddlesome' and 'a conserver' all nouns
C lacks parallelism

Therefore IMO B.

by Prashantbhardwaj

Wed Sep 01, 2010 7:02 am
Forum: Sentence Correction
Topic: Speed limit - long one!
Replies: 282
Views: 109801

Its a simple circular permutation question.

where total no of permutations is = nPr/r


5P5 / 5 = 5! / 5 = 24 Ans.

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:20 am
Forum: Problem Solving
Topic: Arrangements at a round table question
Replies: 4
Views: 2980

Now i get it but. I read the spoiler of reply2spg. How can it be right. Can we actually draw an inference from the answer and then move on to choose another option.?? I mean I read the Option A again and found that it gives me the exact premises which comprise any B-school. Option E gives that the s...

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:44 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: SBS ranking
Replies: 8
Views: 2212

My answer comes out to be A too.

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:37 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: SBS ranking
Replies: 8
Views: 2212

My answer for this is C.

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:29 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Explosion [Tough CR]
Replies: 12
Views: 2160

I also pick E it does nothing the rest weaken the politician's argument. I believe B to be effective in a different way to weaken the passage. It is a more general point as it indicates neither the govt. nor the businesses alone but both of them together. As innovation can be taken up by both. And p...

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:18 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Politician....Time consuming
Replies: 5
Views: 1748

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage? (B) If large areas of eastern forests were increasingly saturated with sulfate and nitrate, the capacity of those forest systems for absorbing nitrogen would also increase. It is opposite to what european theory stat...

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:51 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Inference or main point??
Replies: 14
Views: 2626

I believe A is the answer.

B is actually strengthening our point that if migration is not the cause then it increases the chances of disease and predation to be the cause are more likely.

Rest are not not related and E is also strengthening our point.

So A is the answer.

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:21 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: KIller whale!
Replies: 7
Views: 2998

I find B to be the only one point to be strongly criticizing.

As the parents are deciding what there child should do in future and the will of children has not been considered.

Answer according to me is B.

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:37 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: ###Formal Instruction
Replies: 14
Views: 2215

My answer choice was based on the fact that growth of plants depends on many factors and not just presence or absence of a pollutant which is sulphur dioxide. So i was just simply looking for an answer choice that would point out something else that is responsible for growth of plants. And grime poi...

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:28 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Urban air!
Replies: 5
Views: 1787

I find D to be the only correct explanation.

As if the grime deposits and lesser light can get through then plants are likely to grow slow.

Therefore my answer is D

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:13 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Urban air!
Replies: 5
Views: 1787

I rejected other options because: A) Whether the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted (B) Whether most uranium is used near where it is mined (C) Whether there are any technological advances that show promise of reducing the cost of extracting uranium from seawater (D) Whether the t...

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:03 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Evaluating Argument!
Replies: 30
Views: 19762

My answer is A Since the argument's last line says: "this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable." It can be inferred that this method is not likely to be viable in the near future unless and until the prices of uranium in the market rise higher than the cost of ...

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:52 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Evaluating Argument!
Replies: 30
Views: 19762

It feels like a close tie between C and D. But the Argument tells that the quality of the whisky is derived from its components. But not about how it is derived. As option D helps me find out how that derivation works and the result thus will be opposite two what the author states here. D is the ans...

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:22 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Scotch
Replies: 34
Views: 16069

I think the answer is B.

It can be inferred from the passage that Hampton acknowledges Kim's concern for the availability of land for natural resources and wildlife. And then he suggests an effective solution.

As such B being that solution; B is what they both will agree to.

by Prashantbhardwaj

Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:59 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: ZZZ: Agreement / Disagreement (LSAT)
Replies: 4
Views: 1769