Search found 101 matches
I got question 14 and 16 wrong.
About Q14, I don't understand why "ambivalence" is correct here. I chose E.
Could anyone explain?
- by Spring2009
Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:01 pm- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: I totally bombed this whole reading
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2414
Re: help!
(4) In the passage, the author claims that the doctors make decisions for patients, hospitals, insurance companies. Therefore, it is possible that doctors will control medical costs.kiennguyen wrote:i did 3 & 4 wrong!
someone clarify those for me please!
- by Spring2009
Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:04 am- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: Health Care
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3996
In the first paragraph, it mentions: "While this program enabled many minority entrepreneurs to form new businesses, the results were disappointing , since managerial inexperience, unfavorable locations, and capital shortages led to high failure rates " Because the SBA program was expected...
- by Spring2009
Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:12 pm- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: 1000 RC Passage 12 #4
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1832
It can't be C because: "Moreover, the Puerto Rican twig species closely resembles the twig species of Cuba, Hispaniola, and Jamaica in morphology, habitat use , and behavior" This sentence states that the similar species in two ilands resemble in habitat use, while C says that they differ ...
- by Spring2009
Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:49 pm- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: tough CR! help me!
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2149
- by Spring2009
Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:31 pm- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: Obesity is the Leading disease
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2821
Let me present an analogy.. After I turned 10, I started playing hockey.. So can u say that playing hockey was implication of me turning 10?? I don't think this statement is an analogy. It's not an implication, but it isn't a support either. Can you say that "playing hockey" supported tha...
- by Spring2009
Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:03 pm- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: RC - Animal Treatment
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2109
How to attack a whole underlying sentence ?
All of us know that before picking up an answer choice, we need to find out the differences among the answer choices. With a whole underlying sentence, I usually have to read very carefully and slowly each choice to figure out the differences, and this takes me about 2-3 mins. Could anyone suggest a...
- by Spring2009
Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:39 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: How to attack a whole underlying sentence ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1149
- by Spring2009
Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:17 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: mountain sickness
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2651
A is the OA. isn't the idiom "to allow for something", not "to allow something"? The OA is unbelievable. What is the source? A)2005 and then to stabilize at six billion cubic feet a day, which will allow such an extraction rate at least for "Which" can't modify "a...
- by Spring2009
Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:16 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Natural gas
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6360
- by Spring2009
Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:34 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: energy
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6904
B is reasonable, because the supernova actually did damage ozone layer but at a moderate rate that did not harm our ancestors, but since then natural events have continued to damage ozone layer more and more. This weakens the arguement that the chemicals don't harm human at all. However, I don't se...
- by Spring2009
Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:27 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: LSAT CR 3
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2347
- by Spring2009
Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:07 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Orthodox medicine
- Replies: 17
- Views: 6107
- by Spring2009
Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:01 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Inflation rates
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1883
A is very clear! "A" says that the cost can minimize, and you know that when costs reduce, the profit will increase (if revenue is unchanged). This explains why the profits double.
- by Spring2009
Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:53 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Harvest
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3110
B is reasonable, because the supernova actually did damage ozone layer but at a moderate rate that did not harm our ancestors, but since then natural events have continued to damage ozone layer more and more. This weakens the arguement that the chemicals don't harm human at all. However, I don't see...
- by Spring2009
Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:45 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: LSAT CR 3
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2347