Search found 11 matches
Hi Rich Thanks for your reply! Much more clear now, but still have a mini doubt though, It was clear for me that this question was a comparison between "values of land going up" BUT it's OK to have in a comparison (comma), before "those"? "as fast as, and in some parts even ...
- by [email protected]
Thu Nov 07, 2013 6:13 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Pineland.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2169
Hello! Sorry for bringing up such an old thread! But I'm really confused with this one! I think that this one shouldn't be that hard! But couldn't understand a couple of things from the meaning stand of view. 180. Quasars are so distant that their light has taken billions of years to reach the Earth...
- by [email protected]
Wed Nov 06, 2013 9:56 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Quasars 44
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6832
Hello! Sorry for bringing back such a death thread. Please suggestions, advices, are very welcome :-D 149.Last year, land values in most parts of the pinelands rose almost s o fast, and in some parts even faster than what they did outside the pinelands. (A) so fast, and in some parts even faster tha...
- by [email protected]
Wed Nov 06, 2013 9:17 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Pineland.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2169
Neither I'm part of e-gmat marketing staff, but just for public knowledge purpose, e-gmat offers a good free trial for SC, and I guess some live workshops for CR-RC for free (as well as several articles in the forums). IMO I feel that they have good questions for SC (along with good theory), very gm...
- by [email protected]
Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:46 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!!
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5299
- by [email protected]
Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:09 am- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!!
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5299
First of all, congratulations for the score! Just a simple question, though! How many times did you use the e-gmat program. I mean, did you only attempted the concepts once and then took the post-assessment quizzes or did you work through the whole process more than once. I'm asking this, because IÂ...
- by [email protected]
Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:46 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!!
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5299
Thanks Stuart! Messed up BIG time, it is very clear,,, I assumed that the Paleoindians were a specie of semi-hominid and they're Homo sapiens sapiens! And yes! It is stated in the passage and I also google it, they are indeed the are the earliest known humans of the Americas (http://en.wikipedia.org...
- by [email protected]
Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:04 pm- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: Martin's theory
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13671
Hello everybody... I'm kind of new in writting into forums, but well,,, I'm kind of very confused in the last question on the begin of this discussion: In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to “recent archaeological discoveries� (lines 36-37) most probably in order to A. refute ...
- by [email protected]
Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:24 pm- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: Martin's theory
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13671
Thanks man, It was just applying the negation technique correctly.
I'am going to read very well that book, I feel it very helpfull
Now definitely D is the best option...
Regards,
Ricardo
- by [email protected]
Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:32 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Powerscore Question - Art Historian
- Replies: 19
- Views: 6019
Powerscore Question - Art Historian
Hello, I guess this treat has been inactive for a while,,, I have used the Assumption Negation Technique for all Assumption questions and I feel that it works well (please suggest if this method is appropiate) ,,, but I really do not understand how the argument does not fall apart when we negate ans...
- by [email protected]
Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:26 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Powerscore Question - Art Historian
- Replies: 19
- Views: 6019
excellent explanation! =) oops. yes it's 7^(12x+3) + 3 however, i'm not sure how it is decided that the units would be 3 rather than, 7,9, or 1. I think the explanation given is probably easier to understand than suresh's (which is correct, but a lot more complicated than we need), so let's reexamin...
- by [email protected]
Thu May 17, 2012 4:10 pm- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Remainders With Powers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2937