GMAT Strategy

Hi friends,

I had a doubt about the GMAT scoring logic/pattern. Many of the sites/tests i have tried give enormous importance to initial questions, after which the rate of percentile remains stagnant.
But i've seen Stacey mentioning about attending a conference and saying that the old GMAT strategy of pacing at the end wont work anymore, as wrong answers at the end will lower the score than what we expect.

So is it true to say questions are having equal importance, and so can devote equal time at the end till end?

regards

I think the general consensus - and what I tell my students - is that, yes, the earlier questions are still more important because you need to start getting the harder questions earlier on (and you do this by getting easier and medium level questions right).

Now, that comes with a couple caveats:

1. You still need to leave time to do a decent job on the last few questions. A big string of guesses in a row will probably hurt you, so make sure you have a couple minutes per question towards the end. Now, that doesn't mean you can't guess on one or two questions towards the end if you're running out of time - just don't do them all in a row.

2. I think Stacey mentioned this one before: to a certain extent, you have to be a pretty good GMAT test taker to pace yourself the way that most recommend (e.g., 3 minutes for first 10, 2.5 minutes for next 10, etc.), and if you're good enough to pace yourself properly, you're probably going to score well, anyway.

I tend not to think of pacing as strictly "time per question". Rather, I think of it as how to approach questions. Earlier on, I'm more willing to spend an extra 30 seconds or a minute double checking my work. In the last few questions, if I solve a problem and get an answer I think is right, I'll usually just pick it and keep going. Finally, I'm less likely to take shortcuts on earlier questions, whereas I will usually try to save time by using tricks on later questions.

Pacing is a very individualized thing. You also need to consider how much time you usually have left. I, for example, usually cut it close on math so I'm more concerned with pacing on that section vs. verbal, where I always have 20 minutes left (so I spend as long as I want on every question).

That probably made things even more confusing - that's the GMAT for you!

thanks Jim for prompt reply. As you said, its confusing
it may be secret logic with GMAC.

I also feel ,that string of wrong answers are what GMAT looks into to judge whether u made random guesses or not.

I'm trying it hard for my Verbal part to pace through (rather different from many others), which always ends me up in random guessing at the end

there is a very simple logic to this...

try taking a random book and decide to flip to a random page.

you will realise that you first few flips will be really large as you try to estimate the total pages and the approximate section where the page you want is.

And your last few flips will be smaller and more accurate taking you to the exact page that you want.

there isn't a faster way to find something in an sorted list. (tech speak)

so this is the exact same way in which your gmat scores HAVE to be calculated.

elementary my dear watson...