Can anyone solve this?
In an interview last month, the rebels estimated that a few hundred of their fighter had been trained over the pas two years, and they received close to two million dollars.
A) had been trained over the pas two years, and they
B) were trained over the pas two years, and they had
C)were trained over the pas two years, and they have
D) had been trained over the pas two years and that they had
E) had been trained over the past two years and that they have
SC
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi nadia1989,
The prompt has some typos in it, but I think that I've spotted the intended grammar rules in this question:
1) Verbs - the phrase "the rebels ESTIMATED" uses a past tense verb and refers to events that came BEFORE the estimation. In this situation, we'll need the verb "had" to refer to those past events. Eliminate A, C and E.
2) Parallelism - we're told 2 facts about the rebels, so the facts have to be presented in parallel "format"
The first fact: "....that a few hundred of their fighters had been trained...."
The second fact: "....that they had received...."
Eliminate B.
Final Answer: D
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
The prompt has some typos in it, but I think that I've spotted the intended grammar rules in this question:
1) Verbs - the phrase "the rebels ESTIMATED" uses a past tense verb and refers to events that came BEFORE the estimation. In this situation, we'll need the verb "had" to refer to those past events. Eliminate A, C and E.
2) Parallelism - we're told 2 facts about the rebels, so the facts have to be presented in parallel "format"
The first fact: "....that a few hundred of their fighters had been trained...."
The second fact: "....that they had received...."
Eliminate B.
Final Answer: D
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- VivianKerr
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 474 times
- Followed by:365 members
Just to nitpick, there were a few typos in the question you posted, so here it is in the original form:
In an interview last month, the rebels estimated that a few hundred of their fighters had been trained over the past two years, and they received close to two million dollars worth of ammunition, guns, and heavy artillery during the same time period.
A) had been trained over the past two years, and they
B) were trained over the past two years, and they had
C) were trained over the past two years and they have
D) had been trained over the past two years and that they had
E) had been trained over the past two years and that they have
I only post it because "fighters" should be plural as it affects the question!
First step is to "cut the fat" -- here's the basic meaning of the sentence:
Rebels estimated that fighters had been trained, and they received.
There's two important things going on here: Parallelism and Meaning.
#1 - Parallelism. The GMAT LOVES Parallelism (LOVES it!) so whenever we see 1 noun doing the action of 2 verbs separated by "and," I'm always looking for ways to make those two verbs "parallel" (same tense). Here the verbs are "had been trained" and "received." One is in past perfect form, and the other is in simple past tense. Hmmm...the GMAT's not super into that. Red flag! It would be great if they were BOTH the same.
#2 - Meaning. The last phrase in the sentence states "during the same time period" so BOTH events described in the sentence (the training and the receiving of $$) happened at the same time. We usually only use past perfect tense to describe something that occurred even further back in the past than another past tense event.
For example: I went to store. I went to the movies.
Which one did I do first? We can't tell, because both are in past tense! That's annoying. But, throw a little past perfect in there:
I went to the store. I had gone to the movies.
And voila! Suddenly it's super clear that I went to the movies BEFORE I went to the store.
Anyway, long story short, because the sentence literally states these two events happened at the SAME time, they should both have the SAME tense. Only (D) does this by making them BOTH past perfect.
In an interview last month, the rebels estimated that a few hundred of their fighters had been trained over the past two years, and they received close to two million dollars worth of ammunition, guns, and heavy artillery during the same time period.
A) had been trained over the past two years, and they
B) were trained over the past two years, and they had
C) were trained over the past two years and they have
D) had been trained over the past two years and that they had
E) had been trained over the past two years and that they have
I only post it because "fighters" should be plural as it affects the question!
First step is to "cut the fat" -- here's the basic meaning of the sentence:
Rebels estimated that fighters had been trained, and they received.
There's two important things going on here: Parallelism and Meaning.
#1 - Parallelism. The GMAT LOVES Parallelism (LOVES it!) so whenever we see 1 noun doing the action of 2 verbs separated by "and," I'm always looking for ways to make those two verbs "parallel" (same tense). Here the verbs are "had been trained" and "received." One is in past perfect form, and the other is in simple past tense. Hmmm...the GMAT's not super into that. Red flag! It would be great if they were BOTH the same.
#2 - Meaning. The last phrase in the sentence states "during the same time period" so BOTH events described in the sentence (the training and the receiving of $$) happened at the same time. We usually only use past perfect tense to describe something that occurred even further back in the past than another past tense event.
For example: I went to store. I went to the movies.
Which one did I do first? We can't tell, because both are in past tense! That's annoying. But, throw a little past perfect in there:
I went to the store. I had gone to the movies.
And voila! Suddenly it's super clear that I went to the movies BEFORE I went to the store.
Anyway, long story short, because the sentence literally states these two events happened at the SAME time, they should both have the SAME tense. Only (D) does this by making them BOTH past perfect.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!