Betting heavily on a high percentage hitter, especially one who has a good average and has performed consistently in the past, a seasoned rookie is likely to miss the decline in the hitter's performance, especially if it is interpresed with brilliant innings.
Here the verb-ing modifier (betting heavily ....... hitter) should ideally modify the noun 'a seasoned rookie'. But there is a non-essential modifier (highlighted in red) in between.
My question is can the verb-ing modifier hop over the non-essential modifier and modify the noun rookie ?
I read a concept on a forum that states if you remove the non-essential modifier you remove both the commas as well. So the above sentence essentially becomes:
Betting heavily on a high percentage hitter a seasoned rookie is likely to miss the decline in the hitter's performance, especially if it is interpresed with brilliant innings.
And this construction won't make sense as we need comma before the noun 'a seasoned rookie' for the verb-ing modifier to modify the noun.
Please correct my understanding on this one please.
Need expert's opinion on this modifier concept
This topic has expert replies
- sui generis
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:2 members
- bubbliiiiiiii
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
- Location: Hyderabad, India
- Thanked: 49 times
- Followed by:12 members
- GMAT Score:700
I interpret this statement as under,
Mod 1, Mod 2, Clause.
Mod 1 and Mod 2 modifying the subject of main clause.
I think the sentence written in Mod1, Subject of clause, Mod 2, rest of the clause would be more clear.
Here it is:
Betting heavily on a high percentage hitter, a seasoned rookie, especially one who has a good average and has performed consistently in the past, is likely to miss the decline in the hitter's performance, especially if it is interpresed with brilliant innings.
Between could you please post the complete question along with the source?
Mod 1, Mod 2, Clause.
Mod 1 and Mod 2 modifying the subject of main clause.
I think the sentence written in Mod1, Subject of clause, Mod 2, rest of the clause would be more clear.
Here it is:
Betting heavily on a high percentage hitter, a seasoned rookie, especially one who has a good average and has performed consistently in the past, is likely to miss the decline in the hitter's performance, especially if it is interpresed with brilliant innings.
Between could you please post the complete question along with the source?
Regards,
Pranay
Pranay