Need help with this weird question
Since savings banks have to use short-term deposits to finance long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans, they sometimes lose money when there is a rise in short-term rates and, on the other hand, they are unable to raise the rates on their mortgages.
(A) when there is a rise in short-term rates and, on the other hand, they are unable to raise
(B) when short-term rates rise and they are unable to raise
(C) when a rise in short-term rates occurs and, correspondingly, there is no rise possible in
(D) with a rise in short-term rates, and they are unable to raise
(E) with short-term rates on the rise and no rise possible in
OA B
Thanks
Sumit
Savings banks
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:25 pm
- Thanked: 9 times
- GMAT Score:730
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 6:03 am
- Thanked: 5 times
Sumit, this is how I came to B
As the sentence explains a situation, the situation will occur WHEN ....
So with is incorrect Eliminate Dand E
C/A explains is verbose has correspondingly so eliminate
Also A on othe hand is not required.
B explains meaning and verbs are correct.
As the sentence explains a situation, the situation will occur WHEN ....
So with is incorrect Eliminate Dand E
C/A explains is verbose has correspondingly so eliminate
Also A on othe hand is not required.
B explains meaning and verbs are correct.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
sumithshah,
The subject of the sentence is savings banks.
There are two clauses here that are joined by "AND".
So C
The subject of the sentence is savings banks.
There are two clauses here that are joined by "AND".
So C
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:37 am
- Thanked: 2 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
I meant B . I was just careless and i typed C.saurabh_dce08 wrote:IMO B
Vignesh4384,
pls let me know your reasoning behind C
Thanks for pointing it out
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 12:04 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:620
But i thought A is correct because it express the contrast required though wordy.
isnt contrast required here ???
isnt contrast required here ???
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:48 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
Yes, contrast is required, but i personally ruled out A because the expression is on one hand...and on the other hand and the first part was missing. I would agree the use of they in B is not clear, so i went with C too.Rashmi1804 wrote:But i thought A is correct because it express the contrast required though wordy.
isnt contrast required here ???
- karmayogi
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pm
- Thanked: 27 times
- Followed by:1 members
Not sure. To me, "they" is ambiguous in B. I selected C.gmat740 wrote:They clearly is for Saving Banks.I would agree the use of they in B is not clear, so i went with C too.
B is correct
Experts???
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
--By Swami Vivekananda
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Stacey Koprince
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- Thanked: 639 times
- Followed by:694 members
- GMAT Score:780
I received a PM asking me to reply on the specific issue of pronouns in the above sentence and the broader issue of why pronouns sometimes seem to be ambiguous but the official answer says they're okay or vice versa.
Before I respond, I have a question: who wrote this problem? If it is a released question from the official test writers or if it is from a reputable company that has studied the test extensively, then it is worth discussing any apparent ambiguities. If the problem is not from a good source, however, then don't spend time agonizing over any ambiguities, because you don't know whether the real test would do something similar or whether this just isn't a well-constructed problem.
I'm a little skeptical of this one based on the first word: "since." Official test questions typically prefer "because" in this setup, reserving "since" for expressions related to time. (Yes, in the real world, we often use "because" and "since" interchangeably, and OG explanations will even do this too. But the questions themselves show a decided preference for not using the word "since" when the meaning is "because"!)
Also, as a short explanation, we have to check both logical meaning and structural composition of the sentence. In a quick glance at the problem above, I notice that the subject of the opening clause is "savings banks" and the two "they" pronouns that follow also function as the subjects of their respective clauses. Each "they" pronoun, then, both logically and structurally refers to "savings banks." That is often sufficient to indicate a proper antecedent on official questions, even when there are other plural nouns in the sentence.
Before I respond, I have a question: who wrote this problem? If it is a released question from the official test writers or if it is from a reputable company that has studied the test extensively, then it is worth discussing any apparent ambiguities. If the problem is not from a good source, however, then don't spend time agonizing over any ambiguities, because you don't know whether the real test would do something similar or whether this just isn't a well-constructed problem.
I'm a little skeptical of this one based on the first word: "since." Official test questions typically prefer "because" in this setup, reserving "since" for expressions related to time. (Yes, in the real world, we often use "because" and "since" interchangeably, and OG explanations will even do this too. But the questions themselves show a decided preference for not using the word "since" when the meaning is "because"!)
Also, as a short explanation, we have to check both logical meaning and structural composition of the sentence. In a quick glance at the problem above, I notice that the subject of the opening clause is "savings banks" and the two "they" pronouns that follow also function as the subjects of their respective clauses. Each "they" pronoun, then, both logically and structurally refers to "savings banks." That is often sufficient to indicate a proper antecedent on official questions, even when there are other plural nouns in the sentence.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
Hi stacey,
The source of this question is official gmac retired question paper 48.
Confused with meaning,My undestanding is below :
The Banks loose money when there is rise in Short term interest rates BUT they are unable to increase interest rates on mortgages.
These events are both interconnected actions that leads to loss .But the correct answer (choice B) used AND clause to express them as 2 independent (saperate equal priority) events .
Where am i misreading or understanding it. Please assist
sandhya
The source of this question is official gmac retired question paper 48.
Confused with meaning,My undestanding is below :
The Banks loose money when there is rise in Short term interest rates BUT they are unable to increase interest rates on mortgages.
These events are both interconnected actions that leads to loss .But the correct answer (choice B) used AND clause to express them as 2 independent (saperate equal priority) events .
Where am i misreading or understanding it. Please assist
sandhya