On a recent trip, Cindy drove her car 290 miles, rounded to the nearest 10 miles, and used 12 gallons of gasoline, rounded to the nearest gallon. The actual number of miles per gallon that Cindy's car got on this trip must have been between
Here is explanation from OG: Since the miles are rounded to the nearest 10 miles, the number of miles is between 285 and 295. Since the gallons are rounded to the nearest gallon, the number of gallons is between 11.5 and 12.5
Should not 290 miles rounded to the nearest 10 miles be between 285 and 294?
Should not 12 gallons rounded to the nearest gallon be between 11.5 and 12.4?
The rule of rounding states: Five or more - Raise the score.
Rounding numbers - OG has mistake?
This topic has expert replies
- AndreiGMAT
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:31 am
- Followed by:1 members
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
We round UP when we reach the HALFWAY point between two values.On a recent trip, Cindy drove her car 290 miles, rounded to the nearest 10 miles, and used 12 gallons of gasoline, rounded to the nearest gallon. The actual number of miles per gallon that Cindy's car got on this trip must have been between
A) 290/12.5 to 290/11.5
B) 295/12 to 285/11.5
C) 285/12 to 295/12
D) 285/12.5 to 295/11.5
E) 205/12.5 to 285/11.5
Any value BELOW the halfway point is rounded DOWN.
290 miles, rounded to the nearest 10 miles:
285 ≤ m < 295.
Please note that 295 is the UPPER LIMIT.
Any value below 295 -- even 294.999 -- is rounded DOWN to 290.
12 gallons of gasoline, rounded to the nearest gallon:
11.5 ≤ g < 12.5.
Please note that 12.5 is the UPPER LIMIT.
Any value below 12.5 -- even 12.499 -- is rounded DOWN to 12.
Worst miles per gallon = (lower limit for miles)/(upper limit for gas) = 285/12.5.
Best miles per gallon = (upper limit for miles)/(lower limit for gas) = 295/11.5.
Thus, miles per gallon is between 285/12.5 and 295/11.5.
The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- AndreiGMAT
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:31 am
- Followed by:1 members
GMATGuruNY, this is a very good explanation that made it clear for me. Thanks.
Please note that 295 is the UPPER LIMIT.
Any value below 295 -- even 294.999 -- is rounded DOWN to 290.
- ygcrowanhand
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:47 pm
- Location: London
Hi GMATters,
Here's my video explanation of the question.
Basically don't get hung up on the rounding thing. If the GMAT wants to round in a stupid way, let them--just figure out how they're thinking about it. It wouldn't be the first pointless thing that's appeared in an OG question.
Enjoy!
https://youtu.be/FHSyTcjZaUw
Rowan
Here's my video explanation of the question.
Basically don't get hung up on the rounding thing. If the GMAT wants to round in a stupid way, let them--just figure out how they're thinking about it. It wouldn't be the first pointless thing that's appeared in an OG question.
Enjoy!
https://youtu.be/FHSyTcjZaUw
Rowan
Is Your GMAT Score Stuck in the 600s? This FREE 8-Video, 20-Page Guide Can Help.
https://privategmattutor.london/move-yo ... -the-700s/
PS have you seen the new GMAT Work and Rates guide? Comes with a free 8-video course.
https://yourgmatcoach.podia.com/courses ... s-problems
Learn more about Private GMAT Tutoring at: https://privategmattutor.london
https://privategmattutor.london/move-yo ... -the-700s/
PS have you seen the new GMAT Work and Rates guide? Comes with a free 8-video course.
https://yourgmatcoach.podia.com/courses ... s-problems
Learn more about Private GMAT Tutoring at: https://privategmattutor.london
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
I think we're missing the essential point here. If I say that x is *between* 285 and 295, that means that
285 < x < 295
If we want to include the endpoints (285 ≤ x ≤ 295), then we MUST say *between, inclusive*. The GMAT will be consistent about this.
285 < x < 295
If we want to include the endpoints (285 ≤ x ≤ 295), then we MUST say *between, inclusive*. The GMAT will be consistent about this.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
That would be extremely controversial on their part, enough to call the validity of the test into question. (I mean, they have carte blanche to pull whatever nonsense they want in SC, but in math they have to stick to math, they can't perpetrate any bizarre and arbitrary notions of rounding!)ygcrowanhand wrote:If the GMAT wants to round in a stupid way, let them--just figure out how they're thinking about it.
In any event, it's a non issue, since they're rounding in the proper way. No integer between 285 and 295 can end in 5, since "between" excludes 285 and 295 from consideration.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Of course, the GMAT isn't doing the best job of using "between" in their own explanation! If the number of gallons used is x, and x rounds to 290, then 285 ≤ x < 295.
That said, what I've posted above still holds, "between x and y" means x < ... < y, while "between x and y, inclusive" means x ≤ ... ≤ y. Any official GMAT question (though perhaps not official GMAT explanation) will be consistent about this.
That said, what I've posted above still holds, "between x and y" means x < ... < y, while "between x and y, inclusive" means x ≤ ... ≤ y. Any official GMAT question (though perhaps not official GMAT explanation) will be consistent about this.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Let me also add a way to solve.
Say the number of miles driven is x. Since x, rounded to the nearest 10, is 290, we have 285 ≤ x < 295.
Say the number of gallons used is y. Since y, rounded to the nearest gallon, is 12, we have 11.5 ≤ y < 12.5.
If Cindy drove 295 miles with 11.5 gallons of gas, she'd have maximum efficiency.
If Cindy drove 285 miles with 12.5 gallons of gas, she'd have minimum efficiency.
Normally, we'd say minimum efficiency ≤ Cindy's mpg ≤ maximum efficiency. But since we must be below 295 miles and below 12.5 gallons of gas, we have to change those ≤s to <s. This gives us the inequality
285/12.5 < Cindy's mpg < 295/11.5
and her mpg is between 285/12.5 and 295/11.5.
Say the number of miles driven is x. Since x, rounded to the nearest 10, is 290, we have 285 ≤ x < 295.
Say the number of gallons used is y. Since y, rounded to the nearest gallon, is 12, we have 11.5 ≤ y < 12.5.
If Cindy drove 295 miles with 11.5 gallons of gas, she'd have maximum efficiency.
If Cindy drove 285 miles with 12.5 gallons of gas, she'd have minimum efficiency.
Normally, we'd say minimum efficiency ≤ Cindy's mpg ≤ maximum efficiency. But since we must be below 295 miles and below 12.5 gallons of gas, we have to change those ≤s to <s. This gives us the inequality
285/12.5 < Cindy's mpg < 295/11.5
and her mpg is between 285/12.5 and 295/11.5.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Scott@TargetTestPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 7249
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:56 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 43 times
- Followed by:29 members
If the distance of 290 miles is obtained by rounding to the nearest 10 miles, the actual distance must be between 285 miles and 295 miles. Similarly, if the number of gallons of gasoline used, 12 gallons, is obtained by rounding to the nearest gallon, the actual number of gallons must be between 11.5 gallons and 12.5 gallons. Therefore, the maximum number of miles per gallon is 295/11.5 and the minimum number of miles per gallon is 285/12.5, and the actual number of miles per gallon is some number in between these two numbers.AndreiGMAT wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2016 11:20 pmOn a recent trip, Cindy drove her car 290 miles, rounded to the nearest 10 miles, and used 12 gallons of gasoline, rounded to the nearest gallon. The actual number of miles per gallon that Cindy's car got on this trip must have been between
Note that we maximized the number of miles per gallon by making the numerator as large as possible (295) and the denominator as small as possible (11.5). Similarly, to minimize the mpg, we made the numerator as small as possible (285) and the denominator as large as possible (12.5).
Answer: D
Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]
See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews