Does someone can help?
I don't understand why we have to multiple x by 3 for the first quarter. I thought it would have been an addition instead. So that we would have 3+x for the first quarter. At the 9th quarter we would have had 9x instead of 3x to the 9th power.
Thanks.
Root problem
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:44 am
- Thanked: 2 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi didieravoaka,
We're told that every quarter-century (meaning every 25 years), the price of a bushel is X TIMES (meaning multiplication) more expensive. From 1775 to 2000, we have nine 25-year 'periods' in which the bushel becomes X TIMES more expensive with each period, so we're clearly talking about a LOT of multiplication. However, the price in 1775 is $3 and the price in 2000 is only $9, so all of that multiplication leads to a total product that is only 3 times more expensive over the course of 9 periods. There's only one answer that has a 3 AND accounts for 9 'periods'...
Final Answer: E
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
We're told that every quarter-century (meaning every 25 years), the price of a bushel is X TIMES (meaning multiplication) more expensive. From 1775 to 2000, we have nine 25-year 'periods' in which the bushel becomes X TIMES more expensive with each period, so we're clearly talking about a LOT of multiplication. However, the price in 1775 is $3 and the price in 2000 is only $9, so all of that multiplication leads to a total product that is only 3 times more expensive over the course of 9 periods. There's only one answer that has a 3 AND accounts for 9 'periods'...
Final Answer: E
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:44 am
- Thanked: 2 times