Recent breakthroughs in technology have made it possible that high-definition digital video cameras are able to capture material with a degree of fidelity that nearly compares to 35-millimeter film and to project it digitally in theaters with no resulting loss of image quality.
(A) it possible that high-definition digital video cameras are able to capture material with a degree of fidelity that nearly compares to
(B) it possible to have high-definition digital video cameras that can capture material at a degree of fidelity almost like that with
(C) it possible for high-definition digital video cameras to capture material with a degree of fidelity nearly comparable to that of
(D) possible high-definition digital video cameras that can capture material at a degree of fidelity almost like
(E) possible high-definition digital video cameras able to capture material with a degree of fidelity that nearly compares to that with
[spoiler]OA: B vs C, which one is better and why??? and also which one is wrong and why????[/spoiler]
Recent breakthroughs in technology have made it
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:22 am
- Followed by:1 members
IMO C
Parallelism is there.... high definition cameras to capture.. and to project... Comparison is also better... Comparable to that of instead of almost like that with is better.
Here we are comparing the material taken through hd camera to the material of 35 mm film.
In B.. parallelism is broken... cameras that capture... and to project... it should be.. and that project..
Thanks
Gautam
Parallelism is there.... high definition cameras to capture.. and to project... Comparison is also better... Comparable to that of instead of almost like that with is better.
Here we are comparing the material taken through hd camera to the material of 35 mm film.
In B.. parallelism is broken... cameras that capture... and to project... it should be.. and that project..
Thanks
Gautam
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
Hi Gautam,gsinghal wrote:IMO C
Parallelism is there.... high definition cameras to capture.. and to project... Comparison is also better... Comparable to that of instead of almost like that with is better.
Here we are comparing the material taken through hd camera to the material of 35 mm film.
In B.. parallelism is broken... cameras that capture... and to project... it should be.. and that project..
Thanks
Gautam
Is there a idiom also possible to or possible for???? Like we have idiom for responsible I.e responsibility to and responsible for
- Jim@Grockit
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:07 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 162 times
- Followed by:45 members
- GMAT Score:760
Another key difference is what is actually possible; in one, it is possible for cameras to capture, while in the other it is possible to have those cameras.