quant review problem 124

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:02 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

quant review problem 124

by HPengineer » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:53 am
If rs does not = 0, is 1/r + 1/s = 4

S1. r + s = 4rs

S2. r = s


My issue here is with statement two...

if r = s then why can i not insert this into the equation in the stem and re write as 1/r + 1/r = 4 solve for r and be done with it?

on other problems i have seen where they say x = y and you can take that info back to the stem and turn X*Y into X^2.. but here that doesnt apply...damn you gmat...

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:07 am
HPengineer wrote:If rs does not = 0, is 1/r + 1/s = 4

S1. r + s = 4rs

S2. r = s


My issue here is with statement two...

if r = s then why can i not insert this into the equation in the stem and re write as 1/r + 1/r = 4 solve for r and be done with it?
The question is asking whether (1/r + 1/s) = 4 or not.
If you replace r = s from the statement 2 into the equation, obviously you'll get a value of r which satisfies the equation. The solutions are in fact r = s = 1/2. But the question is not really asking you to do this! For this particular set of values of r and s the relation satisfies. But not for all r and s that satisfies the relation r = s. For instance, r = s = 1 does not satisfies the equation. Thus statement 2 is not sufficient to answer the question.

But for statement 1, (r + s) = 4rs => (r + s)/rs = 4 => (1/r + 1/s) = 4.
Therefore for any set of values of r and s that satisfies the condition given in statement 1, satisfies the equation given in question stem. Hence statement 1 is sufficient.

Hope that clears your confusion.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

by bblast » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:59 am
in short, as anurag said statement 2 is only true at one value r=s=1/2.
it is false for every other value, hence insufficient,
u need to have an equation satisfy any given set of values for a statement to be sufficient
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_