Principle CR

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

Principle CR

by kanha81 » Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:23 am
This is quite an interesting CR that I came across PowerScore CR Bible and thought to share with the community.

Jeff: Proposed regulations concerning the use of
animals in scientific experimentation would
prohibit experimentation on those species that
humans empathize with: dogs and horses, for
example. But extensive neurological research
on mammals shows that they are all capable of
feeling pain, just as dogs and horses are. Hence,
this proposal should be extended to all
experimentation on all mammals.

Miranda: Yet the issue of pain is not the crux of the
matter. Experimentation on any nonhuman
animal undermines respect for life itself
because only humans are capable of consenting
to an experiment. Since any activity that
undermines respect for life diminishes the
quality of all of our lives, the new regulations
should ban all such experimentation.

Which one of the following is a principle that, if
established, would best support Jeff’s conclusion?

(A) Regulations on the use of animals in scientific
experimentation should be primarily
concerned with respecting the feelings of the
humans who will perform those experiments.

(B) Whatever means are used to determine whether
dogs and horses feel pain should also be used
to determine whether other animals feel pain.

(C) Only those experiments on animals that are
known to cause those animals pain should be
prohibited.

(D) Scientists who perform experiments on animals
should empathize with any mammal as much
as they empathize with dogs or horses.

(E) Scientific experimentation should be
prohibited on any creature that is capable of
feeling pain.

As you can see, it is indeed a lengthy CR, but nonetheless very interesting.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:16 am
Location: San Francisco
Thanked: 14 times

by mbadrew » Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:59 am
IMO it's E.

A--ruled out because it's senseless.

B--ruled out because the argument doesn't talk about methods used to find out how dogs and horses feel pain.

C--ruled out because the experiments will have to be conducted to discover if it causes pain or not.

D--doesn't make sense.

E. Makes sense.

Let us know what the OA is.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pm
Thanked: 27 times
Followed by:1 members

by karmayogi » Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:13 pm
A, B and D were easy to eliminate. Between C and E, I selected E because it directly addresses Jeff's point: Prohibit experiment on mammals because they are capable of feeling pain. If E is true then it automatically covers Jeff's point.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:03 am
E for me too

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 119
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:730

by mikeCoolBoy » Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:12 am
IMO E

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:18 pm
GMAT Score:720

Re: Principle CR

by sg1928 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:23 am
kanha81 wrote:This is quite an interesting CR that I came across PowerScore CR Bible and thought to share with the community.

Jeff: Proposed regulations concerning the use of
animals in scientific experimentation would
prohibit experimentation on those species that
humans empathize with: dogs and horses, for
example. But extensive neurological research
on mammals shows that they are all capable of
feeling pain, just as dogs and horses are. Hence,
this proposal should be extended to all
experimentation on all mammals.

Miranda: Yet the issue of pain is not the crux of the
matter. Experimentation on any nonhuman
animal undermines respect for life itself
because only humans are capable of consenting
to an experiment. Since any activity that
undermines respect for life diminishes the
quality of all of our lives, the new regulations
should ban all such experimentation.

Which one of the following is a principle that, if
established, would best support Jeff’s conclusion?

(A) Regulations on the use of animals in scientific
experimentation should be primarily
concerned with respecting the feelings of the
humans who will perform those experiments.

(B) Whatever means are used to determine whether
dogs and horses feel pain should also be used
to determine whether other animals feel pain.

(C) Only those experiments on animals that are
known to cause those animals pain should be
prohibited.

(D) Scientists who perform experiments on animals
should empathize with any mammal as much
as they empathize with dogs or horses.

(E) Scientific experimentation should be
prohibited on any creature that is capable of
feeling pain.

As you can see, it is indeed a lengthy CR, but nonetheless very interesting.
Jeff talks about prohibition of experimentation on all "mammals". While E talks about "any creature". I feel we are extending Jeff's argument to all creatures rather than just mammals. So between B and E, I will go with B.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

by kanha81 » Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:06 am
karmayogi wrote:A, B and D were easy to eliminate. Between C and E, I selected E because it directly addresses Jeff's point: Prohibit experiment on mammals because they are capable of feeling pain. If E is true then it automatically covers Jeff's point.
Excellent point, Karmayogi! OA is [spoiler][E][/spoiler]
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:33 am

by kris77 » Fri May 13, 2016 11:28 pm
Looking at it now, E makes sense