GMAT Prep

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:17 pm
Thanked: 5 times

GMAT Prep

by moneyman » Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:34 am
Need some logic on this
Attachments
TRI.JPG
Maxx

Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Sat Nov 01, 2008 4:33 am
IMO D

say angles RPS: a, PRS: b, PQS: c

Stment: 1
in triangle PRS: a+b=90 (sum of all is 180 and rt angled at S)...1
in triangle QPS: a+30+c=90 (sum of all is 180 and rt angled at S)
or a+c=60.....2

subtracting 2 from 1 we get b-c=30 , hence statement 1 sufficient

Statement: 2: PQR+PRQ=150, it follows that QPR=30, which is what we started statement 1 with, hence sufficent

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:02 am

by ReenaMo » Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:21 am
scoobydooby wrote:
Statement: 2: PQR+PRQ=150, it follows that QPR=30, which is what we started statement 1 with, hence sufficent

Can you explain the concept behind how you found Statement 2 sufficient?

Thanks

Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:10 am
ReenaMo wrote:
scoobydooby wrote:
Statement: 2: PQR+PRQ=150, it follows that QPR=30, which is what we started statement 1 with, hence sufficent

Can you explain the concept behind how you found Statement 2 sufficient?

Thanks
In triangle QPR, PQR+PRQ=150, or QPR=30 (sum of all angles is 180, two are 150, and the third is therefore 30). we started with this info, ie QPR=30 in statement 1 and found it to be sufficent, here also we are down to the same information. it is therefore sufficient.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:02 am

by ReenaMo » Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:16 pm
Got it - that was my mistake. I read one of the angles incorrectly. Thanks!