Critical Reasoning

Answers only with explanations....Please dont post answers without expanation...

IOB B.

If the routes are same then it is going to take the same time for a passenger to get from the airport or from the station to his destination.

We need to strengthen the argument
the conclusion says
"to save money and time ppl should take train"

the time saving is mentioned in the argument

A says
time taken to and from station is same
so this we need inorder to evaluate actual time saving
bcoz
if train takes 4.5 hrs but drops me 2 hrs from city and airport is in city
than no use of train

so IMO A is best



B IMO is wrong
becuase if we know the time than routes hardly matters
time taken by train is less, thats sufficient.
Had it been something related to cost, if would have given a look at....


C
no need of this


D
we are no concerned about confort


E
we are no concerned about bonus points
we do not know how much benefit each point will give
even here, it says no bonus points
so again no cost saving
hence out

OA is not A

My choice would be D. It offers one more advantage! What's better than 2 advantages? 3!

B should be the answer

A : going to station or airport doesn't effect the conclusion, which is about travel time from destination T to D.

B says that if routes are same from T to D... this means a person has choice between train and flight... and he should choose train as it takes less time and money...and route is the same...

i guess...its a tough question

stop@800 wrote:We need to strengthen the argument
the conclusion says
"to save money and time ppl should take train"

the time saving is mentioned in the argument

A says
time taken to and from station is same
so this we need inorder to evaluate actual time saving
bcoz
if train takes 4.5 hrs but drops me 2 hrs from city and airport is in city
than no use of train

There is no way to find whether a plane ticket is more expensive than a train ticket or vice-versa.

Also, the cost for most people in country D to travel to and from the station is about the same to that of travelling to and from an airport. This cost could be more for people travelling to and from a TS than for people travelling to and from an AP. (can't be certain)

choice B can't be correct because

the conclusion is talking about visitors travelling from country D to country T and not the other way round. (at least that's what I could decipher because the sentence got chopped after tr... so I assumed it were ''trains to'')

Hence, it does not matter what the route is on the way back as we are concerned with only a one-way journey.

Undoubtedly (at least for me) the answer choices should be between A and E as these are the only two answer choices which talk about cost.

Time saving argument is already established in the passage so we need not be concerned with it, but it is the cost saving argument which we need to establish.

I will not go for E - (not confidently though and here is why)

This is why I would go for E -

E states that the bonus points scheme will be discontinued. This undoubtedly will raise the cost of tickets per person. Earlier, passengers could claim bonus points and get a reduced fare for their trip which they won't be able to do now and hence the tickets will be more expensive for them.

This is why I am sceptical of E -

Reasoning is the same as in A - nowhere is it mentioned whether the train tickets are cheaper than plane tickets.

Agreed that there were benefits of bonus points but the extent of bonus points related price reduction is not established at all.

In fact I think D is the correct choice, so I would pick D

1) Time saving is established in the argument
2) In D cost savings are offered in the shape of added perks (more comfortable ride) which would probably cost more in a plane. Of course we are assuming that the prices of train tickets and plane tickets are comparable.

I think E is best.
What's OA. If this is correct I can explain....

it's B.

OA?

aj5105 wrote:it's B.

OA?

can u explain?

The argument talks about train taking lesser time than plane.
Conclusion talks about 'time and money'

Strengthen-- some point for train rather than some point against plane

Choice B does this best with info very close to the argument.
Choice B says the travelling back takes the same time for both modes of transport.In short,the author is favouring train journey.

What's the OA,anyway?

aj5105 wrote: Conclusion talks about 'time and money'

Choice B says the travelling back takes the same time for both modes of transport.In short,the author is favouring train journey.

What's the OA,anyway?

The conclusion does not talk about the return journey.

All its saying is that to save time and money, travellers from country D should take the train to country T. (Does not mention the return journey).

So, I don't see how the time taken by the return journey strengthens the conclusion stated in the passage.

OA B