Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4

by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:30 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x+3| < 4
(2) |x-3| < 4

OA E

Source: Veritas Prep

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1449
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:16 pm
Thanked: 59 times
Followed by:33 members

by fskilnik@GMATH » Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:45 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x+3| < 4
(2) |x-3| < 4
Source: Veritas Prep
$$x\,\mathop > \limits^? \,\,0$$
$$\,\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,x = 0\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,x = 0.5\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {\rm{E}} \right)$$

This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:40 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Is x > 0 ?
(1) |x+3| < 4
(2) |x-3| < 4
When solving inequalities involving ABSOLUTE VALUE, there are 2 things you need to know:
Rule #1: If |something| < k, then -k < something < k
Rule #2: If |something| > k, then EITHER something > k OR something < -k


Target question: Is x > 0 ?

Statement 1: |x+3| < 4
From Rule #1, we can write: -4 < x + 3 < 4
Subtract 3 from all 3 sides to get: -7 < x < 1
If -7 < x < 1, then:
x could equal 0.5, in which case the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
x could equal -0.5, in which case the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: |x-3| < 4
From Rule #1, we can write: -4 < x - 3 < 4
Add 3 to all 3 sides to get: -1 < x < 7
If -1 < x < 7, then:
x could equal 0.5, in which case the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
x could equal -0.5, in which case the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
IMPORTANT: Notice that I was able to use the same counter-examples to show that each statement ALONE is not sufficient. So, the same counter-examples will satisfy the two statements COMBINED.
In other words,
x could equal 0.5, in which case the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
x could equal -0.5, in which case the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image