Because a manufacturer secures a patent for a pharmaceutical compound, the patent does not bar competitors from producing a chemical like it, as long as those chemicals have at least one structural difference with the patented compound.
(A) same as original
(B) That a manufacturer has secured a patent for one of its pharmaceutical compounds do not bar competitors from producing similar chemicals and having at least one important difference from the patented compound
(C) A patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds does not bar competitors from producing a chemical like the patented compound, as long as the two differ structurally in at least one way
(D) When securing a patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds, competitors are not barred from the production of chemicals such as the patented compound, provided that there is at least one structural difference
(E) Even if a manufacturer secures a patent for one of its pharmaceutical compounds, this does not bar competitors from the production of a chemical such as the patented compound, but having at least one structural difference from it
OA C
Source: Manhattan Prep
Because a manufacturer secures a patent for a pharmaceutical
This topic has expert replies
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Option A: Incorrect
The innate conjunction used here is faulty, and does not follow parallelism.
Option B: Incorrect
In this option, there is a problem with the subject-verb connection. That is, between the Manufacturer and producing similar chemicals.
Option C: correct
This option follows parallelism in the right syntax and everything is in proper order. Pronoun and conjunctions were well placed.
Option D: Incorrect
such is not the right idiom to introduce a patent substance, it is faulty.
Option E: Incorrect
This suffers same fate as option D above and also, this option a faulty pronoun usage.
The innate conjunction used here is faulty, and does not follow parallelism.
Option B: Incorrect
In this option, there is a problem with the subject-verb connection. That is, between the Manufacturer and producing similar chemicals.
Option C: correct
This option follows parallelism in the right syntax and everything is in proper order. Pronoun and conjunctions were well placed.
Option D: Incorrect
such is not the right idiom to introduce a patent substance, it is faulty.
Option E: Incorrect
This suffers same fate as option D above and also, this option a faulty pronoun usage.