Electrons, elementary particles that exist in orbitals around the positively charged nucleus of an atom, seem similar in many ways to ordinary particles however exhibiting surprising wave-like characteristics.
(A) seem similar in many ways to ordinary particles however exhibiting
(B) are to ordinary particles very similar however exhibit
(C) are in many ways similar to ordinary particles that have been known to exhibit
(D) seem similar in many ways to ordinary particles which exhibit
(E) are in many ways similar to ordinary particles but also exhibit
OA E
Source: Princeton Review
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Electrons, elementary particles that exist in orbitals
This topic has expert replies
-
BTGmoderatorDC
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
-
deloitte247
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
There are several ways to analyse the statement but it must be within the confine of the contextual features.
Option A - INCORRECT
There seems to be no observable difference between the underlined sentences in this sentence when compared with the original underlined sentence in the question. It is thus in applicable.
Option B - INCORRECT
There is a confusing and contradictory statement in relation to the author's perspectives here. Grammatically faulty analogy of the subject statement.
Option C - INCORRECT
There is a contradictory opinion and perspective to the particles and their mode of exhibition which isn't clearly differentiated in this option statement.
Option D - INCORRECT
There are two perspectives here, one is the similarities and the second is the mode of exhibiting the wave-like characteristics. However, the option only analysed it such that it shows just the similarities neglecting the other.
Option E - CORRECT
The option captures correctly the intention of the writer which seeks to explain that, "however similar the charged particles could be when compared with ordinary particles, they still exhibit other features of wave.
Option A - INCORRECT
There seems to be no observable difference between the underlined sentences in this sentence when compared with the original underlined sentence in the question. It is thus in applicable.
Option B - INCORRECT
There is a confusing and contradictory statement in relation to the author's perspectives here. Grammatically faulty analogy of the subject statement.
Option C - INCORRECT
There is a contradictory opinion and perspective to the particles and their mode of exhibition which isn't clearly differentiated in this option statement.
Option D - INCORRECT
There are two perspectives here, one is the similarities and the second is the mode of exhibiting the wave-like characteristics. However, the option only analysed it such that it shows just the similarities neglecting the other.
Option E - CORRECT
The option captures correctly the intention of the writer which seeks to explain that, "however similar the charged particles could be when compared with ordinary particles, they still exhibit other features of wave.
